| Literature DB >> 30059550 |
Chia H Chang1, Yi-Ting Chiang2, Likwang Chen3, Ken N Kuo2,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hip screening is the standard approach for the early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the effects of national policy on early diagnosis and later surgical incidence. The purpose of this national study is to estimate DDH incidence in the Taiwanese population through a new diagnosis definition and to examine whether a health promotion policy could reduce surgeries for DDH. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30059550 PMCID: PMC6066215 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200995
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flowchart of identification of study subjects.
Number of DDH by year of birth and year of diagnosis.
The accumulated cases in one birth-year cohort were divided by the total live births to calculate DDH incidence.
| Birth year | Diagnosis year | Total | Total live births | Incidence | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | ||||
| 2000 | 184 | 149 | 97 | 21 | 8 | 5 | 464 | 305,312 | 1.52 | |||||
| 2001 | 170 | 156 | 62 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 409 | 260,354 | 1.57 | |||||
| 2002 | 211 | 121 | 72 | 17 | 10 | 5 | 436 | 247,530 | 1.76 | |||||
| 2003 | 148 | 125 | 41 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 326 | 227,070 | 1.44 | |||||
| 2004 | 164 | 96 | 55 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 331 | 216,419 | 1.53 | |||||
| 2005 | 136 | 95 | 43 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 289 | 205,854 | 1.40 | |||||
*Data from Department of Statistics, Ministry of the Interior, Taiwan
# Incidence rate: 1/1,000 live births
Incidence of DDH per thousand was stratified by the diagnosis age and the ratio of early diagnosis over late diagnosis from 2000 to 2005.
| Birth year | Diagnosis age | Early / late ratio | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–3m | 4–6m | 7–12m | 1–2yr | 2–3yr | 3–4yr | 4–5yr | < 6m | > 1yr | ||
| 2000 | 0.48 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.47 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 1.06 |
| 2001 | 0.53 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.46 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.76 | 0.61 | 1.25 |
| 2002 | 0.65 | 0.27 | 0.17 | 0.50 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.92 | 0.67 | 1.38 |
| 2003 | 0.45 | 0.28 | 0.23 | 0.40 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.73 | 0.48 | 1.50 |
| 2004 | 0.55 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.40 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.79 | 0.53 | 1.50 |
| 2005 | 0.61 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.33 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.81 | 0.46 | 1.75 |
Numbers of surgical cases stratified by operation age and the surgical incidence in the six cohorts.
| Birth year | Operation age | Surgical DDH | Total live births | Surgical incidence | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–6 m | 7–12 m | 1–2 yr | 2–3 yr | 3–4 yr | 4–5 yr | ||||
| 2000 | 28 | 33 | 110 | 25 | 8 | 5 | 209 | 305,312 | 0.68‰ |
| 2001 | 24 | 31 | 98 | 26 | 4 | 2 | 185 | 260,354 | 0.71‰ |
| 2002 | 22 | 22 | 97 | 20 | 9 | 6 | 176 | 247,530 | 0.71‰ |
| 2003 | 18 | 21 | 73 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 132 | 227,070 | 0.58‰ |
| 2004 | 22 | 19 | 72 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 132 | 216,419 | 0.61‰ |
| 2005 | 13 | 14 | 53 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 100 | 205,854 | 0.49‰ |
| Total | 127 | 140 | 503 | 113 | 28 | 23 | 934 | ||
Distribution of major and minor surgeries by operation age revealed a strong association between surgical type and age.
Incidence of major surgeries decreased gradually from 2002.
| Birth year | Major surgeries / minor surgeries | Incidence of major surgeries in total live births | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–6 m | 7–12 m | 1–2 yr | 2–5 yr | Total | ||
| 2000 | 1/27 | 7/26 | 80/30 | 37/1 | 125/84 | 0.41‰ |
| 2001 | 2/22 | 4/27 | 78/20 | 32/0 | 116/69 | 0.45‰ |
| 2002 | 1/21 | 5/17 | 77/20 | 33/2 | 116/60 | 0.47‰ |
| 2003 | 1/17 | 6/15 | 58/15 | 20/0 | 85/47 | 0.37‰ |
| 2004 | 0/22 | 3/16 | 56/16 | 19/0 | 78/54 | 0.36‰ |
| 2005 | 2/11 | 3/11 | 43/10 | 19/1 | 67/33 | 0.33‰ |
| Total | 7/120 | 28/112 | 392/111 | 160/4 | 587/347 | |
Fig 2Decreasing incidence of surgery in the six birth-year cohorts.