Literature DB >> 9643684

Surgery for congenital dislocation of the hip in the UK as a measure of outcome of screening. MRC Working Party on Congenital Dislocation of the Hip. Medical Research Council.

S Godward1, C Dezateux.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Universal clinical screening for congenital dislocation of the hip to detect hip instability in neonates was introduced in the UK as a national policy in 1969, but its effectiveness is not known. We aimed to assess the extent to which surgery for congenital dislocation of the hip is the result of a failure of detection through screening or follows non-surgical treatment after detection by screening.
METHODS: We established a national orthopaedic surveillance scheme and used routine hospital data for inpatients for 20% of births in the UK (Scotland and the Northern and Wessex regions) to ascertain the number of children aged under 5 years per 1000 livebirths who had received at least one operative procedure for congenital dislocation of the hip from April, 1993, to April, 1994. Estimates of the incidence of operative procedures were adjusted for under-ascertainment by capture-recapture techniques.
FINDINGS: The ascertainment-adjusted incidence of a first operative procedure for congenital dislocation of the hip in the UK was 0.78 per 1000 livebirths (95% CI 0.72-0-84). Congenital dislocation of the hip had not been detected by routine screening in 222 (70%) of 318 children reported to the national orthopaedic surveillance scheme. In 112 (35%) children the diagnosis was made primarily as a result of parental concern. 67 (21%) children had previously received non-surgical treatment. In Scotland and the Northern and Wessex regions, 81 cases were notified to the national orthopaedic surveillance scheme, 62 cases were identified only through routine hospital data on inpatients, and an estimated 20 cases were not identified by either source, making a total of 163 cases. Thus, 81 (50%) of these 163 cases were identified by surveillance, 125 (77%) by routine data, and 143 (88%) by both sources.
INTERPRETATION: The incidence of a first operative procedure for congenital dislocation of the hip in the UK was similar to that reported before screening was introduced. In most children who received surgery, congenital dislocation of the hip was not detected by screening. Formal evaluation of current and alternative screening policies, including universal primary ultrasound imaging, is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9643684     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)10466-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  30 in total

Review 1.  Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns.

Authors:  H Patel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Newborn and childhood screening programmes: criteria, evidence, and current policy.

Authors:  D A C Elliman; C Dezateux; H E Bedford
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Hip dysplasia and ultrasound imaging of whole populations: the precautionary principle revisited.

Authors:  D Elbourne; C Dezateux
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Etamsylate for prevention of periventricular haemorrhage.

Authors:  R W Hunt
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 5.  Quality of care by neonatal nurse practitioners: a review of the Ashington experiment.

Authors:  D Hall; A R Wilkinson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  Prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip in children with clubfoot.

Authors:  Daud Ts Chou; Manoj Ramachandran
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  Performance, treatment pathways, and effects of alternative policy options for screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  C Dezateux; J Brown; R Arthur; J Karnon; A Parnaby
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Efficiency of alternative policy options for screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  J Brown; C Dezateux; J Karnon; A Parnaby; R Arthur
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Exclusion of COL2A1 and VDR as developmental dysplasia of the hip genes.

Authors:  Michele Rubini; Alessandra Cavallaro; Elisa Calzolari; Giulia Bighetti; Vincenzo Sollazzo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Developmental dysplasia of the hip: impact of sonographic newborn hip screening on the outcome of early treated decentered hip joints-a single center retrospective comparative cohort study based on Graf's method of hip ultrasonography.

Authors:  Christian Tschauner; Frank Fürntrath; Yasaman Saba; Andrea Berghold; Roman Radl
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.