Literature DB >> 30059151

Assessment of the cerebral pressure-flow relationship using psychological stress to manipulate blood pressure.

Ryan C Brindle1, Annie T Ginty2, Anna C Whittaker3,4, Douglas Carroll3, Samuel J E Lucas3,4.   

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that cerebral autoregulation (CA) might be more pressure passive than previously thought. That is, cerebral blood flow, traditionally thought to be regulated independently of prevailing mean arterial pressure (MAP), might fluctuate, to some extent, as a function of MAP. However, due to limitations associated with experimental usage of pharmaceuticals to manipulate MAP and inconsistent control of arterial carbon dioxide, questions remain regarding the MAP-cerebral blood flow relationship, especially during typical daily activities that alter MAP. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess CA using a nonpharmacological acute psychological stress task to augment MAP, while at the same time controlling for end-tidal carbon dioxide (PET CO2 ). Twenty-five healthy young adults completed a stressful task while continuous measures of MAP, middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAv), and PET CO2 were recorded. Slope values obtained from hierarchical linear regression were used to assess the strength of the MAP-MCAv relationship and control for PET CO2 . The stress task significantly increased MAP (p < 0.001) and MCAv (p < 0.001), and decreased PET CO2 (p = 0.05). For every 10 mmHg task-induced increase in MAP, MCAv increased by ≈3.5%; task-induced changes in PET CO2 did not appreciably change the MAP-MCAv relationship. Greater task-induced MAP responses were significantly related to decreased MAP-MCAv slope values, consistent with CA. These data support the hypothesis that CA is more pressure passive than previously thought and provide initial evidence indicating that a pressure-passive MAP-MCAv relationship may play a role in the observed associations between MAP stress responses, stroke, and cerebrovascular disease.
© 2018 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; cerebral blood flow; stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30059151      PMCID: PMC6261679          DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  36 in total

1.  Cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption in man.

Authors:  N A LASSEN
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 2.  Cerebral autoregulation: from models to clinical applications.

Authors:  Ronney B Panerai
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng       Date:  2008-03

3.  Have a safe night: intimate protection against cerebral hyperperfusion during REM sleep.

Authors:  Philip N Ainslie
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-02-05

4.  Influence of changes in blood pressure on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation.

Authors:  Samuel J E Lucas; Yu Chieh Tzeng; Sean D Galvin; Kate N Thomas; Shigehiko Ogoh; Philip N Ainslie
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Evaluation of reproducibility of spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity at rest and during laboratory tests.

Authors:  F Iellamo; J M Legramante; G Raimondi; F Castrucci; M Massaro; G Peruzzi
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 6.  Cardiovascular reactivity in real life settings: measurement, mechanisms and meaning.

Authors:  Ydwine Jieldouw Zanstra; Derek William Johnston
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 7.  How to measure baroreflex sensitivity: from the cardiovascular laboratory to daily life.

Authors:  G Parati; M Di Rienzo; G Mancia
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  Noninvasive transcranial Doppler ultrasound recording of flow velocity in basal cerebral arteries.

Authors:  R Aaslid; T M Markwalder; H Nornes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Cerebrovascular mental stress reactivity is impaired in hypertension.

Authors:  Tasneem Z Naqvi; Hanh K Hyuhn
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 10.  Why is the neural control of cerebral autoregulation so controversial?

Authors:  Philip N Ainslie; Patrice Brassard
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.