Literature DB >> 30059109

Large-scale QM/MM free energy simulations of enzyme catalysis reveal the influence of charge transfer.

Heather J Kulik1.   

Abstract

Hybrid quantum mechanical-molecular mechanical (QM/MM) simulations provide key insights into enzyme structure-function relationships. Numerous studies have demonstrated that large QM regions are needed to systematically converge ground state, zero temperature properties with electrostatic embedding QM/MM. However, it is not well known if ab initio QM/MM free energy simulations have this same dependence, in part due to the hundreds of thousands of energy evaluations required for free energy estimations that in turn limit QM region size. Here, we leverage recent advances in electronic structure efficiency and accuracy to carry out range-separated hybrid density functional theory free energy simulations in a representative methyltransferase. By studying 200 ps of ab initio QM/MM dynamics for each of five QM regions from minimal (64 atoms) to one-sixth of the protein (544 atoms), we identify critical differences between large and small QM region QM/MM in charge transfer between substrates and active site residues as well as in geometric structure and dynamics that coincide with differences in predicted free energy barriers. Distinct geometric and electronic structure features in the largest QM region indicate that important aspects of enzymatic rate enhancement in methyltransferases are identified with large-scale electronic structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30059109      PMCID: PMC6085747          DOI: 10.1039/c8cp03871f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  89 in total

1.  Enzymatic methyl transfer: role of an active site residue in generating active site compaction that correlates with catalytic efficiency.

Authors:  Jianyu Zhang; Judith P Klinman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Robust Periodic Hartree-Fock Exchange for Large-Scale Simulations Using Gaussian Basis Sets.

Authors:  Manuel Guidon; Jürg Hutter; Joost VandeVondele
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  On the Convergence of QM/MM Energies.

Authors:  LiHong Hu; Pär Söderhjelm; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Comparison of QM-Only and QM/MM Models for the Mechanism of Tungsten-Dependent Acetylene Hydratase.

Authors:  Rong-Zhen Liao; Walter Thiel
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 5.  QM/MM studies of enzymes.

Authors:  Hans Martin Senn; Walter Thiel
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  QM/MM simulations for methyl transfer in solution and catalysed by COMT: ensemble-averaging of kinetic isotope effects.

Authors:  Natalia Kanaan; J Javier Ruiz Pernía; Ian H Williams
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Hybrid QM/MM Molecular Dynamics with AMOEBA Polarizable Embedding.

Authors:  Daniele Loco; Louis Lagardère; Stefano Caprasecca; Filippo Lipparini; Benedetta Mennucci; Jean-Philip Piquemal
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Kinetic studies on catechol O-methyltransferase. Product inhibition and the nature of the catechol binding site.

Authors:  J K Coward; E P Slixz; F Y Wu
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1973-06-05       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Inhibition of rat liver and duodenum soluble catechol-O-methyltransferase by a tight-binding inhibitor OR-462.

Authors:  E Schultz; E Nissinen
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1989-11-15       Impact factor: 5.858

10.  Quantified electrostatic preorganization in enzymes using the geometry of the electron charge density.

Authors:  Amanda Morgenstern; Matthew Jaszai; Mark E Eberhart; Anastassia N Alexandrova
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 9.825

View more
  8 in total

1.  Revealing quantum mechanical effects in enzyme catalysis with large-scale electronic structure simulation.

Authors:  Zhongyue Yang; Rimsha Mehmood; Mengyi Wang; Helena W Qi; Adam H Steeves; Heather J Kulik
Journal:  React Chem Eng       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 2.  Enhanced-Sampling Simulations for the Estimation of Ligand Binding Kinetics: Current Status and Perspective.

Authors:  Katya Ahmad; Andrea Rizzi; Riccardo Capelli; Davide Mandelli; Wenping Lyu; Paolo Carloni
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-06-08

3.  Biomolecular QM/MM Simulations: What Are Some of the "Burning Issues"?

Authors:  Qiang Cui; Tanmoy Pal; Luke Xie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  When are two hydrogen bonds better than one? Accurate first-principles models explain the balance of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors found in proteins.

Authors:  Vyshnavi Vennelakanti; Helena W Qi; Rimsha Mehmood; Heather J Kulik
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.825

5.  Efficiently Computing Excitations of Complex Systems: Linear-Scaling Time-Dependent Embedded Mean-Field Theory in Implicit Solvent.

Authors:  Joseph C A Prentice
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 6.578

6.  Optimizing the Calculation of Free Energy Differences in Nonequilibrium Work SQM/MM Switching Simulations.

Authors:  Andreas Schöller; Fiona Kearns; H Lee Woodcock; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 7.  Enzyme Models-From Catalysis to Prodrugs.

Authors:  Zeinab Breijyeh; Rafik Karaman
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Cheminformatic quantum mechanical enzyme model design: A catechol-O-methyltransferase case study.

Authors:  Thomas J Summers; Qianyi Cheng; Manuel A Palma; Diem-Trang Pham; Dudley K Kelso; Charles Edwin Webster; Nathan J DeYonker
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.699

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.