Literature DB >> 30058207

Performance evaluation of the mindray anti-HCV assay for the detection of hepatitis C virus infection.

Zhi-Hong Yue1, Chang-Sheng Xia1, Hui Wang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) antibody assays are recommended for HCV infection screening. The Mindray anti-HCV assay, based on a third-generation immunoassay, was recently launched in China. We aimed to evaluate its diagnostic performance compared with that of two other widely used assays.
METHODS: Six HCV infection seroconversion panels were used to evaluate the sensitivity of the assay for early detection. A total of 1952 clinical samples were tested by the Mindray anti-HCV, Elecsys anti-HCV II, and Architect anti-HCV assays. Samples with reactive results using at least one anti-HCV assay were further tested with the recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA). Inconsistent results were investigated by the HCV RNA assay and HCV core antigen assay. HCV infection diagnosis was made according to the results of laboratory tests and medical records.
RESULTS: The Mindray anti-HCV assay and Elecsys anti-HCV II assay detected seroconversion in an average of 12.5 days and 10.5 days, respectively, and this difference was not significant (P = .818). Of the 1952 cases, 90 were categorized as "HCV infection" and 1862 were categorized as "no HCV infection." The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of each assay were as follows: the Mindray anti-HCV assay, 95.6%, 99.2%, 85.1%, 99.8%, 118.6 and 0.045, respectively; the Architect anti-HCV assay, 98.9%, 95.2%, 50.0%, 99.9%, 20.69 and 0.012, respectively; and the Elecsys anti-HCV II assay, 96.7%, 99.9%, 98.9%, 99.8%, 1799.9 and 0.033, respectively. There were significant differences in the specificity, PPV and LR+ among the three assays (P < .001). There were no significant differences in the sensitivity, NPV or LR- among the three assays (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The Mindray anti-HCV assay displays a similar sensitivity to the Elecsys anti-HCV II assay with respect to the early detection of HCV infection. The Mindray anti-HCV assay shows excellent diagnostic performance and is suitable for the screening of HCV infection.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Architect anti-HCV assay; Elecsys anti-HCV II assay; Mindray anti-HCV assay; anti-HCV; diagnostic performance; hepatitis C virus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30058207      PMCID: PMC6817259          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  17 in total

1.  Retrospective analysis on the diagnostic performances and signal-to-cut-off ratios of the Elecsys Anti-HCV II assay.

Authors:  Banseok Kim; Hyo Jun Ahn; Min Hyuk Choi; Yongjung Park
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Different signal-to-cut-off ratios from three automated anti-hepatitis C virus chemiluminescence immunoassays in relation to results of recombinant immunoblot assays and nucleic acid testing.

Authors:  Eun-Jee Oh; Jiyoung Chang; Jin-Young Yang; Yonggoo Kim; Yeon-Joon Park; Kyungja Han
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Anti-HCV immunoblot indeterminate results in blood donors: non-specific reactivity or past exposure to HCV?

Authors:  P Kiely; C Styles
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.144

4.  Performance evaluation and comparison of the newly developed Elecsys anti-HCV II assay with other widely used assays.

Authors:  Ruifeng Yang; Wenli Guan; Qian Wang; Yan Liu; Lai Wei
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.786

5.  Performance evaluation of the mindray anti-HCV assay for the detection of hepatitis C virus infection.

Authors:  Zhi-Hong Yue; Chang-Sheng Xia; Hui Wang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 6.  Laboratory diagnostics for hepatitis C virus infection.

Authors:  Saleem Kamili; Jan Drobeniuc; Aufra C Araujo; Tonya M Hayden
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Guidelines for laboratory testing and result reporting of antibody to hepatitis C virus. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors:  Miriam J Alter; Wendi L Kuhnert; Lyn Finelli
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2003-02-07

8.  Reflex threshold of signal-to-cut-off ratios of the Elecsys anti-HCV II assay for hepatitis C virus infection.

Authors:  Jie Pan; Xin Li; Guowei He; Shuai Yuan; Pingfeng Feng; Xiuming Zhang; Yurong Qiu
Journal:  J Infect Dev Ctries       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 0.968

9.  Clinical performance evaluation of four automated chemiluminescence immunoassays for hepatitis C virus antibody detection.

Authors:  Sinyoung Kim; Jeong-Ho Kim; Seoyoung Yoon; Youn-Hee Park; Hyon-Suk Kim
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Diagnostic accuracy of tests to detect Hepatitis C antibody: a meta-analysis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Weiming Tang; Wen Chen; Ali Amini; Debi Boeras; Jane Falconer; Helen Kelly; Rosanna Peeling; Olivia Varsaneux; Joseph D Tucker; Philippa Easterbrook
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.090

View more
  3 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of the mindray anti-HCV assay for the detection of hepatitis C virus infection.

Authors:  Zhi-Hong Yue; Chang-Sheng Xia; Hui Wang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Clinical diagnostic performance of light-initiated chemiluminescent assay compared with the Architect chemiluminescence immunoassay for detection of HCV antibody.

Authors:  Shuo Yang; Ruifeng Yang; Siyu Zhang; Di Liu; Jiansuo Zhou; Tiancheng Wang; Liyan Cui
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  The role of a two-assay serological testing strategy for anti-HCV screening in low-prevalence populations.

Authors:  Yanfang Huang; Huifen Pan; Qin Gao; Panpan Lv; Xiaoqin Xu; Zhen Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.