BACKGROUND: In this study, we described Millennial anesthesiology residents' learning preferences and study habits and how they correlate with performance on the In-Training Exam (ITE). METHODS: A confidential questionnaire including personal characteristics, previous examination performance, study habits, study material preferences, and perceived residency program support was emailed to 1047 anesthesiology residents from 30 ACGME-accredited residency programs across the United States. RESULTS: Four hundred and twelve residents (39.4%) responded to the survey, and 240 of those respondents (58.3%) self-reported their 2017 ITE scores. The majority (95.9%) were Millennials. Respondents preferentially used online multiple-choice questions (92.3%) to prepare for the ITE, but many also used traditional anesthesiology textbooks (35.5%) and review books (46.7%). Respondents preferred independent study (94.6%) to group study (5.4%), and handwritten notes (69.4%) to taking notes on a laptop (26.8%) or tablet (3.8%). Less than half (47.5%) of respondents felt supported by their residency program in exam preparation, and 30.7% felt lack of support. Factors correlated with ITE scores on univariate analysis included prior USMLE 1 scores (p < .0000) and USMLE 2 scores (p < .0000), clinical anesthesia year (p < .0000), test anxiety score (p = .0004), prior failure of the basic exam (p = .0026), and prior failure of any board exam (p = .0124). CONCLUSIONS: Millennial learners have consistent performance on ITE exams regardless of personal characteristics, preferred study methods, or materials used. Prior exam performance is the most important predictor of future performance. Currently available study materials are meeting residents' needs and preferences, and while residency program offerings do not affect ITE performance, residents would like to feel more supported.
BACKGROUND: In this study, we described Millennial anesthesiology residents' learning preferences and study habits and how they correlate with performance on the In-Training Exam (ITE). METHODS: A confidential questionnaire including personal characteristics, previous examination performance, study habits, study material preferences, and perceived residency program support was emailed to 1047 anesthesiology residents from 30 ACGME-accredited residency programs across the United States. RESULTS: Four hundred and twelve residents (39.4%) responded to the survey, and 240 of those respondents (58.3%) self-reported their 2017 ITE scores. The majority (95.9%) were Millennials. Respondents preferentially used online multiple-choice questions (92.3%) to prepare for the ITE, but many also used traditional anesthesiology textbooks (35.5%) and review books (46.7%). Respondents preferred independent study (94.6%) to group study (5.4%), and handwritten notes (69.4%) to taking notes on a laptop (26.8%) or tablet (3.8%). Less than half (47.5%) of respondents felt supported by their residency program in exam preparation, and 30.7% felt lack of support. Factors correlated with ITE scores on univariate analysis included prior USMLE 1 scores (p < .0000) and USMLE 2 scores (p < .0000), clinical anesthesia year (p < .0000), test anxiety score (p = .0004), prior failure of the basic exam (p = .0026), and prior failure of any board exam (p = .0124). CONCLUSIONS: Millennial learners have consistent performance on ITE exams regardless of personal characteristics, preferred study methods, or materials used. Prior exam performance is the most important predictor of future performance. Currently available study materials are meeting residents' needs and preferences, and while residency program offerings do not affect ITE performance, residents would like to feel more supported.
Entities:
Keywords:
Millennial generation; graduate medical education; medical education; test preparation
Authors: Larry F Chu; Matthew J Erlendson; John S Sun; Anna M Clemenson; Paul Martin; Reuben L Eng Journal: Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol Date: 2012-03
Authors: Laura Hopkins; Brittany S Hampton; Jodi F Abbott; Samantha D Buery-Joyner; LaTasha B Craig; John L Dalrymple; David A Forstein; Scott C Graziano; Margaret L McKenzie; Archana Pradham; Abigail Wolf; Sarah M Page-Ramsey Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-06-28 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Travis H Markham; Johanna B de Haan; Sara Guzman-Reyes; John F Zaki; Semhar J Ghebremichael; Carlos Artime; Evan G Pivalizza Journal: J Educ Perioper Med Date: 2020-07-01
Authors: Matthew D McEvoy; Leslie C Fowler; Amy Robertson; Brian J Gelfand; Geoffrey M Fleming; Bonnie Miller; Donald Moore Journal: J Educ Perioper Med Date: 2021-07-01