| Literature DB >> 30057669 |
Miguel A Ortega1,2,3, Ángel Asúnsolo3,4, Javier Leal5, Beatriz Romero1,2,3, María J Alvarez-Rocha1, Felipe Sainz6, Melchor Álvarez-Mon1,2,3,7, Julia Buján1,2,3, Natalio García-Honduvilla1,2,3,8.
Abstract
Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is a multifactorial disease, commonly caused by valvular incompetence (clinically diagnosed by venous reflux) and venous hypertension. The incidence of these factors clearly increases with patient age, and aging is one of the risk factors involved. The activity of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is considered fundamental in vascular pathologies, and understanding its involvement would help in the development of possible therapeutic targets. This is an observational, analytical, and prospective cohort study that reviewed 110 patients with CVI scheduled to undergo stratified saphenectomy. They were distributed according to the presence (R = 81) or absence (NR = 29) of valvular incompetence (venous reflux) diagnosed clinically. Each of the groups was further divided according to age, with a cutoff point of 50 years (NR < 50 = 13, NR ≥ 50 = 16, R < 50 = 32, and R ≥ 50 = 49). The involvement of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, as well as that of HIF-1α and HIF-2α and of CD4+, CD8+, and CD19+ cells and mastocytes, was assessed. Saphenous vein tissue samples obtained during surgery were processed for RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry. Patients with venous reflux showed a significant increase in mRNA and protein expression levels for PI3K/mTOR and HIF-1α/HIF-2α. The number of mast cells was significantly elevated in the R group. In distribution by age, PI3K/Akt/mTOR and HIF-1α were significantly higher in R < 50 patients. Furthermore, these patients had a significant increase in the number of CD4+, CD8+, and CD19+ cells and mastocytes in the saphenous vein wall. These findings provide a basis for the possible existence of changes in PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway expression in young patients, with potential accelerated asynchronous aging that is enhanced by CVI.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30057669 PMCID: PMC6051059 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1495170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Primary antibodies that were used and their dilutions.
| Antigen | Species | Clone | Dilution | Provider | Protocol specifications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akt | Rabbit | Polyclonal | 1 : 1000 | Abcam (ab8805) | — |
| CD4 | Rabbit | Monoclonal | 1 : 50 | Abcam (ab133616) | EDTA pH = 9 before incubation with blocking solution |
| CD8 | Rabbit | Polyclonal | 1 : 25 | Abcam (ab4055) | EDTA pH = 9 before incubation with blocking solution |
| CD19 | Mouse | Monoclonal | 1 : 200 | Abcam (ab31947) | — |
| HIF-1 | Mouse | Monoclonal | 1 : 800 | Abcam (ab16066) | EDTA pH = 9 before incubation with blocking solution |
| HIF-2 | Mouse | Monoclonal | 1 : 2000 | Abcam (ab8365) | EDTA pH = 9 before incubation with blocking solution |
| PI3K | Mouse | Monoclonal | 1 : 500 | Abcam (ab86714) | — |
| mTOR | Rabbit | Polyclonal | 1 : 500 | Abcam (ab1093) | — |
Secondary antibodies that were used and their dilutions.
| Antigen | Species | Clone | Dilution | Provider |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgG (mouse) | Goat | Polyclonal | 1/300 | Sigma |
| IgG (rabbit) | Mouse | RG-96 | 1/1000 | Sigma |
Primers used for RT-qPCR: sequences and binding temperatures (Temp).
| Gene | Sequence fwd (5′ → 3′) | Sequence rev (5′ → 3′) | Temp (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | GGA AGG TGA AGG TCG GAG TCA | GTC ATT GAT GGC AAC AAT ATC CAC T | 60 |
| Akt | TGT CTC GTG AGC GCG TGT TTT | CCG TTA TCT TGA TGT GCC CGT C | 60 |
| HIF-1 | ACG TGT TAT CTG TCG CTT TGA G | ATC GTC TGG CTG CTG TAA TAA TG | 59 |
| HIF-2 | ACC CAG TAC CAG GAC TAC AGC | GGC ACG TTC ACC TCA CAG TC | 61 |
| PI3K | CTT GCC TCC ATT CAC CAC CTC T | GCC TCT AAT CTT CTC CCT CTC CTT C | 60 |
| mTOR | ATC CAG ACC CTG ACC CAA AC | TCC ACC CAC TTC CTC ATC TC | 60 |
Figure 1(a) Significant levels of mRNA for PI3K quantified by RT-qPCR in R and R < 50 patients. Results were normalized to that of the reference gene GAPDH and are provided in arbitrary units. NR = no reflux; R = reflux. ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.005. (b) Distribution of the percentage of patients with positive protein expression for PI3K in NR and R patients and by age. n = number of patients. (c) A-B: Histological images for PI3K protein expression in the different tunicae of venous wall in NR < 50 (160x) and NR ≥ 50 patients (320x). C-D: Images of PI3K expression of R > 50 throughout the vein wall (C, 320x) smooth muscle bundles (arrow) in the tunica media (D, 500x) and in the venula (arrow) of the tunica adventitia (E, 1000x). F-G: PI3K protein expression images in R ≥ 50 patients along the wall of the vein (F, 640x) and in the insertion areas of the venous valves (G, 1000x). The red coloration indicates the specific precipitate that correlates with the expression of the said protein. A = tunica adventitia; M = tunica media; I = tunica intima.
Figure 2(a) Significant levels of mRNA for Akt quantified by RT-qPCR. In R < 50 patients, results were normalized to that of the reference gene GAPDH and are provided in arbitrary units. NR = no reflux; R = reflux. ∗p < 0.05. (b) Distribution of the percentage of patients with positive protein expression for Akt in NR and R patients and by age; n = number of patients. (c) A–C: Histological images for Akt protein expression in the different tunicae of venous wall in NR < 50 (200x), NR ≥ 50 (200x), and R < 50 patients (200x). D-E: Detail of expression for Akt at greater magnification in R < 50 for tunica intima (640x) and tunica media (640x). F: R ≥ 50 patients show a heterogeneously Akt protein expression as small accumulations (arrow) in the tunica media (400x). A = tunica adventitia; M = tunica media; I = tunica intima. The brown coloration indicates the specific precipitate that correlates with the expression of the said protein.
Figure 3(a) Significant levels of mRNA for mTOR quantified by RT-qPCR in R and R < 50 patients. Results were normalized to that of the reference gene GAPDH and are provided in arbitrary units. NR = no reflux; R=reflux. ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.005. (b) Distribution of the percentage of patients with positive protein expression for mTOR in NR and R patients and by age; n = number of patients. (c) A: Histological images for protein expression mTOR in the different tunicae of venous wall in NR < 50 patients (350x). B, C: mTOR protein expression images in NR ≥ 50 patients (200x–400x). The brown coloration indicates the specific precipitate that correlates with the expression of the said protein. A = tunica adventitia; M = tunica media; I = tunica intima.
Figure 4(a) Histological images for protein expression of mTOR in the different tunicae of the venous wall in R < 50 patients (200x). (b-c) Detail of expression for mTOR at greater magnification in media tunica (640x) and venula (arrow) in adventitia tunica (1000x). (d-e) Protein expression images of mTOR in R ≥ 50 patients, with detail in smooth muscle bundles (arrow) and blood capillary (arrowhead) in the tunica media (640x). The brown coloration indicates the specific precipitate that correlates with the expression of the said protein. A = tunica adventitia; M = tunica media; I = tunica intima.
Figure 5(a) Significant levels of mRNA for HIF-1α quantified by RT-qPCR in R and R < 50 patients. Results were normalized to that of the reference gene GAPDH and are provided in arbitrary units. NR = no reflux; R = reflux. ∗p < 0.05. (b) Distribution of the percentage of patients with positive protein expression in HIF-1α NR and R patients and by age; n = number of patients. (c) A–D: Histological images for HIF-1α protein expression in the different tunicae of the venous wall in NR < 50, NR ≥ 50, R > 50, and R ≥ 50 patients (120x). Red coloration indicates the specific precipitate that correlates with the expression of said protein. A = tunica adventitia; M = tunica media; I = tunica intima.
Figure 6(a) Significant levels of mRNA for HIF-2α quantified by RT-qPCR in R. Results were normalized to that of the reference gene GAPDH and are provided in arbitrary units. NR = no reflux; R = reflux. ∗p < 0.05. (b) Distribution of the percentage of patients with positive protein expression in HIF-2α NR and R patients and by age; n = number of patients. (c) A: Protein expression images of HIF-2α in cell nucleus (arrow) of R > 50 patients (640x). B: Protein expression images of HIF-2α in capillary (arrow) of adventitia tunica in R > 50 patients (640x). Red coloration indicates the specific precipitate that correlates with the expression of the said protein.
Figure 7(a) Positive cell quantification of CD4+, CD8+, CD19+, and mast cells in the three tunicae of the vein wall for patients without reflux (NR) and with reflux (R), as well as by the ages of the same. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.005; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (b) Histological images showing the specific detection of immune cells CD4+, CD8+, and CD19+ and mast cells in R < 50 patients.