Literature DB >> 30057503

The New Statistics for Neuroscience Majors: Thinking in Effect Sizes.

Robert J Calin-Jageman1.   

Abstract

An ongoing reform in statistical practice is to report and interpret effect sizes. This paper provides a short tutorial on effect sizes and some tips on how to help your students think in terms of effect sizes when analyzing data. An effect size is just a quantitative answer to a research question. Effect sizes should always be accompanied by a confidence interval or some other means of expressing uncertainty in generalizing from the sample to the population. Effect sizes are best interpreted in raw scores, but can also be expressed in standardized terms; several popular standardized effect score measures are explained and compared. Reporting and interpreting effect sizes has several benefits: it focuses on the practical significance of your findings, helps make clear the remaining uncertainty in your findings, fosters better planning for subsequent experiments, fosters meta-analytic thinking, and can help focus efforts on protocol optimization. You can help your students start to think in effect sizes by giving them tools to visualize and translate between different effect size measures, and by tasking them to build a 'library' of effect sizes in a research field of interest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  confidence intervals; effect sizes; inferential statistics; neuroscience education

Year:  2018        PMID: 30057503      PMCID: PMC6057753     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ        ISSN: 1544-2896


  15 in total

1.  Color and psychological functioning: the effect of red on performance attainment.

Authors:  Andrew J Elliot; Markus A Maier; Arlen C Moller; Ron Friedman; Jörg Meinhardt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-02

2.  Correlational effect size benchmarks.

Authors:  Frank A Bosco; Herman Aguinis; Kulraj Singh; James G Field; Charles A Pierce
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2014-10-13

3.  Reporting effect sizes in original psychological research: A discussion and tutorial.

Authors:  Jolynn Pek; David B Flora
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2017-03-09

Review 4.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Authors:  Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Transcriptional changes following long-term sensitization training and in vivo serotonin exposure in Aplysia californica.

Authors:  Kristine Bonnick; Karla Bayas; Dmitry Belchenko; Ashly Cyriac; Michael Dove; Jamie Lass; Benora McBride; Irina E Calin-Jageman; Robert J Calin-Jageman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Savings memory is accompanied by transcriptional changes that persist beyond the decay of recall.

Authors:  Leticia Perez; Ushma Patel; Marissa Rivota; Irina E Calin-Jageman; Robert J Calin-Jageman
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature.

Authors:  Denes Szucs; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Performing Contrast Analysis in Factorial Designs: From NHST to Confidence Intervals and Beyond.

Authors:  Stefan Wiens; Mats E Nilsson
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.821

9.  Transcriptional correlates of memory maintenance following long-term sensitization of Aplysia californica.

Authors:  Catherine Conte; Samantha Herdegen; Saman Kamal; Jency Patel; Ushma Patel; Leticia Perez; Marissa Rivota; Robert J Calin-Jageman; Irina E Calin-Jageman
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 10.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs.

Authors:  Daniël Lakens
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-26
View more
  3 in total

1.  Exposure to multisensory and visual static or moving stimuli enhances processing of nonoptimal visual rhythms.

Authors:  Ourania Tachmatzidou; Nadia Paraskevoudi; Argiro Vatakis
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 2.157

2.  Effect size, sample size and power of forced swim test assays in mice: Guidelines for investigators to optimize reproducibility.

Authors:  Neil R Smalheiser; Elena E Graetz; Zhou Yu; Jing Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Vicarious Trial and Error Behaviors.

Authors:  Jesse T Miles; Kevan S Kidder; Ziheng Wang; Yiru Zhu; David H Gire; Sheri J Y Mizumori
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.