Luke V Selby1, Wazim R Narain2, Ashley Russo1, Vivian E Strong3, Peter Stetson2. 1. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. 2. Department of Surgery Health Informatics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. 3. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Electronic address: strongv@mskcc.org.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Natural language processing, a computer science technique that allows interpretation of narrative text, is infrequently used to identify surgical complications. We designed a natural language processing algorithm to identify and grade the severity of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (together: venous thromboembolism). METHODS: Patients from our 2011-2014 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project cohorts with a duplex ultrasound or a computerized tomography angiography of the chest performed within 30 days of surgery were divided into training and validation datasets. A "bag of words" approach classified the reports; other electronic health record data classified the venous thromboembolism's severity. RESULTS: Of the 10,295 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project patients, 251 were used in our deep venous thromboses validation cohort (273 total ultrasounds) and 506 in our pulmonary embolisms cohort (552 total computerized tomography angiographies). For deep venous thromboses the sensitivity and specificity were 85.1% and 94.6%, while for pulmonary embolisms they were 90% and 98.7%. Most discordances were due to lack of imaging documentation of a deep venous thrombosis (28/41, 68.3%) or pulmonary embolism (6/6, 100%). Most deep venous thromboses (28 patients, 54.6%) and pulmonary embolisms (25 patients, 75.8%) required administration of therapeutic intravenous or subcutaneous anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: Natural language processing can reliably detect the presence of postoperative venous thromboembolisms, and its use should be expanded for the detection of other conditions from narrative documentation.
INTRODUCTION: Natural language processing, a computer science technique that allows interpretation of narrative text, is infrequently used to identify surgical complications. We designed a natural language processing algorithm to identify and grade the severity of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (together: venous thromboembolism). METHODS:Patients from our 2011-2014 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project cohorts with a duplex ultrasound or a computerized tomography angiography of the chest performed within 30 days of surgery were divided into training and validation datasets. A "bag of words" approach classified the reports; other electronic health record data classified the venous thromboembolism's severity. RESULTS: Of the 10,295 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project patients, 251 were used in our deep venous thromboses validation cohort (273 total ultrasounds) and 506 in our pulmonary embolisms cohort (552 total computerized tomography angiographies). For deep venous thromboses the sensitivity and specificity were 85.1% and 94.6%, while for pulmonary embolisms they were 90% and 98.7%. Most discordances were due to lack of imaging documentation of a deep venous thrombosis (28/41, 68.3%) or pulmonary embolism (6/6, 100%). Most deep venous thromboses (28 patients, 54.6%) and pulmonary embolisms (25 patients, 75.8%) required administration of therapeutic intravenous or subcutaneous anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: Natural language processing can reliably detect the presence of postoperative venous thromboembolisms, and its use should be expanded for the detection of other conditions from narrative documentation.
Authors: S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; J Demakis; J B Aust; V Chong; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G Irvin; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Luke V Selby; Emily A Vertosick; Daniel D Sjoberg; Mark A Schattner; Yelena Y Janjigian; Murray F Brennan; Daniel G Coit; Vivian E Strong Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-02-16 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Bradley A Fritz; Krisztina E Escallier; Arbi Ben Abdallah; Jordan Oberhaus; Jennifer Becker; Kristin Geczi; Sherry McKinnon; Dan L Helsten; Anshuman Sharma; Troy S Wildes; Michael S Avidan Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Luke V Selby; Mindy Sovel; Daniel D Sjoberg; Margaret McSweeney; Damon Douglas; David R Jones; Peter T Scardino; Gerald A Soff; Nicola Fabbri; Kent Sepkowitz; Vivian E Strong; Inderpal S Sarkaria Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: David S Carrell; Scott Halgrim; Diem-Thy Tran; Diana S M Buist; Jessica Chubak; Wendy W Chapman; Guergana Savova Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Sunghwan Sohn; David W Larson; Elizabeth B Habermann; James M Naessens; Jasim Y Alabbad; Hongfang Liu Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: M Tien; R Kashyap; G A Wilson; V Hernandez-Torres; A K Jacob; D R Schroeder; C B Mantilla Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Katherine P Liao; Tianxi Cai; Guergana K Savova; Shawn N Murphy; Elizabeth W Karlson; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Vivian S Gainer; Stanley Y Shaw; Zongqi Xia; Peter Szolovits; Susanne Churchill; Isaac Kohane Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-04-24
Authors: Zhengyi Deng; Kanhua Yin; Yujia Bao; Victor Diego Armengol; Cathy Wang; Ankur Tiwari; Regina Barzilay; Giovanni Parmigiani; Danielle Braun; Kevin S Hughes Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2019-08
Authors: Ibrahim Saber; Alys Adamski; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Karon Abe; Michele Beckman; Nimia Reyes; Ryan Schulteis; Bhavana Pendurthi Singh; Andrea Sitlinger; Elizabeth H Thames; Thomas L Ortel Journal: Res Pract Thromb Haemost Date: 2022-07-21
Authors: Jianlin Shi; John F Hurdle; Stacy A Johnson; Jeffrey P Ferraro; David E Skarda; Samuel R G Finlayson; Matthew H Samore; Brian T Bucher Journal: Surgery Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 4.348