| Literature DB >> 30055591 |
Gibson B Kagaruki1, Mary T Mayige2, Esther S Ngadaya3, Andrew M Kilale3, Amos Kahwa3, Amani F Shao4, Godfather D Kimaro3, Chacha M Manga3, Doris Mbata2, Godlisten S Materu4, Ray M Masumo4, Sayoki G Mfinanga2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Type2 Diabetes and Hypertension (T2DM/HTN) have become serious threats to the health and socio-economic development in the developing countries. People living with HIV (PLHIV) infection are more vulnerable of developing T2DM/HTN due to HIV infection itself and antiretroviral treatments. The situation is worse when behavioral and biological risk factors are pervasive to PLHIV. Despite this vicious circle; information on the level of knowledge and perception regarding prevention of T2DM/HTN, risks factors and associated complications among PLHIV is not well documented in Tanzania. The aim of this paper was assess the level of T2DM/HTN knowledge and perception among PLHIV and utilizing care and treatment clinic (CTC) services.Entities:
Keywords: ART and ART Naïve clients; Knowledge; Perception; Tanzania; Type2 diabetes/hypertension
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30055591 PMCID: PMC6064130 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5639-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Distribution of demographic characteristic of the respondents
| Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Response rate | 671 | 89.0 |
| Type of respondents | ||
| Clients on ART | 354 | 52.8 |
| ART Naïve clients | 317 | 47.2 |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 198 | 29.5 |
| Female | 473 | 70.5 |
| Locality | ||
| Urban | 336 | 50.1 |
| Rural | 335 | 49.9 |
| Age Group | ||
| 18–34 | 251 | 37.4 |
| 35–44 | 251 | 37.4 |
| 45–54 | 117 | 17.4 |
| 55+ | 52 | 7.8 |
| Education Level | ||
| No formal education | 87 | 13.0 |
| Primary education | 503 | 75.0 |
| Secondary and above | 81 | 12.0 |
| Marital status | ||
| Couple | 319 | 47.5 |
| Non-Couple | 352 | 52.5 |
| Occupation | ||
| Farmer | 234 | 34.9 |
| Self-employed | 224 | 33.4 |
| Employed | 76 | 11.3 |
| Others | 91 | 13.5 |
| Missing | 46 | 6.9 |
Percentage of respondents with low knowledge on diabetes type2/hypertension risk factors and negative perception towards changing against risk behaviors of the diseases among HIV clients utilizing care and treatment services in Tanzania (n = 671)
| Statement for testing knowledge level | Total, n (%) | Clients on ART, n (%) | ART Naïve clients, n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Having family member with history of diabetes, hypertension is a risk to a person to get these diseases | 581(86.6) | 302(85.3) | 279(88.0) | 0.181 |
| Eating fruits less than 5 times a week can lead a person to get hypertension or diabetes | 613(91.3) | 322(91.0) | 291(91.8) | 0.403 |
| Eating food with too much cholesterol/fats is healthy for person’s life | 155(23.1) | 72(20.3) | 83(26.2) | 0.044 |
| If a person is overweight or obese is at risk to get disease like hypertension or diabetes | 277(41.3) | 146(41.2) | 131(41.3) | 0.523 |
| Impotence, amputation, blindness, stroke and renal failure are the outcomes of diabetes | 473(70.3) | 246(69.5) | 227(71.6) | 0.303 |
| Lifestyle changes (healthy diet, increase physical activity, cessation of smoking/tobacco use) can help to manage diabetes and hypertension | 329(49.0) | 171(48.3) | 158(49.8) | 0.374 |
| Alcoholism is the risk factors for diabetes and hypertension | 324(48.3) | 167(47.2) | 157(49.5) | 0.298 |
| Doing physical activities that results in sweating can prevent or delay onsets of diseases like diabetes and hypertension | 357(53.0) | 184(52.0) | 173(54.6) | 0.276 |
| Adding salt to cooked food is not good for health because it increases possibility of getting hypertension | 287(42.8) | 142(40.1) | 145(45.7) | 0.298 |
| Overall proportion of respondents with low knowledge | 276(41.1) | 141(39.8) | 135(42.6) | 0.259 |
| Statement for assessing perception level | ||||
| If a person suddenly becomes thin and slender is a sign of running bankrupt | 214(31.9) | 114(36.0) | 100(28.2) | 0.020 |
| To become thin and slender is not good because people will consider one to be HIV positive | 274(40.8) | 134(42.3) | 140(39.5) | 0.262 |
| If somebody is fat has to maintain his/her body structure otherwise can be considered to be HIV positive | 336(50.1) | 165(52.1) | 171(48.3) | 0.186 |
| HIV positive person has to be fat if became thin and slander he/she will be stigmatized | 423(63.0) | 201(63.4) | 222(62.7) | 0.458 |
| HIV person should eat food with high in fats & carbohydrate content always so as to increase & maintain heavy weight | 372(55.4) | 183(57.7) | 189(53.4) | 0.147 |
| An HIV positive person has to drink alcohol daily in order to reduce stress related to his/her status | 87(13.0) | 44(13.9) | 43(12.1) | 0.290 |
| An HIV positive person is not supposed to do any casual work which can lead to sweating | 286(42.6) | 144(45.4) | 142(40.1) | 0.095 |
| Smoking is not a problem to HIV positive person as it causes relaxation to an individual | 87(13.0) | 45(14.2) | 42(11.9) | 0.217 |
| Overall proportion of respondents with negative perception | 293(43.7) | 144(45.4) | 149(42.1) | 0.214 |
Unadjusted and Adjusted Odd Ratio (OR) analysis to explore determinants of low knowledge level regarding type2 diabetes/hypertension risk factors and complications
| Factor | Total with low knowledge, | Clients on ART | ART Naïve clients | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted OR, 95%CI | Adjusted OR, 95%CI | Unadjusted OR, 95%CI | Adjusted OR, 95%CI | ||
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 80(40.4) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Female | 196(41.1) | 1.1(0.7–1.7) | 1.0(0.6–1.6) | ||
| Locality | |||||
| Urban | 112(33.3) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Rural | 164(49.0)* | 2.4(1.6–3.7) | 2.2(1.4–3.4) | 1.5(1.1–2.3) | 1.2(0.8–2.0) |
| Age Group | |||||
| ≥ 40 years | 181(42.4) | 1 | 1 | ||
| < 40 years | 95(38.9) | 0.8(0.5–1.2) | 1.0(0.6–1.7) | ||
| Marital status | |||||
| Couple | 167(41.5) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Non-Couple | 109(40.5) | 0.9(0.6–1.4) | 1.0(0.6–1.6) | ||
| Education Level | |||||
| Secondary and above | 31(38.3) | 1 | 1 | ||
| No formal or having primary | 245(41.5) | 1.2(0.6–2.2) | 1.1(0.5–2.3) | ||
| Ever measured BP in life | |||||
| Yes | 111(35.6) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| No | 165(46.0)† | 1.5(1.0–2.3) | 1.1(0.7–1.8) | 1.6(1.0–2.5) | 1.3(0.8–2.1) |
| Ever measured Blood Glucose in life | |||||
| Yes | 13(20.6) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| No | 263(43.3)* | 2.9(1.2–6.8) | 2.3(1.1–5.7) | 3.0(1.2–7.5) | 2.1(0.8–5.6) |
| Currently has HIV & NCD Co-morbidities | |||||
| Yes | 34(31.5) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| No | 242(43.0)‡ | 1.2(0.7–2.1) | 2.8(1.3–6.0) | 2.2(1.2–4.9) | |
P-value for Chi-squire test results: *p < 0.0001, † p = 0.001 and ‡ p < 0.05, Odd Ratio (OR)
Unadjusted and Adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) to explore determinants of negative perception on behavioural change against T2DM/HTN risk factors
| Factor | Total with negative perception, | Clients on ART | ART Naïve clients | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted OR, 95%CI | Adjusted OR, 95%CI | Unadjusted OR, 95%CI | Adjusted OR, 95%CI | ||
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 78(39.4) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Female | 215(45.5) | 1.8(1.1–2.9) | 2.0(1.2–3.2) | 0.8(0.5–1.4) | |
| Locality | |||||
| Urban | 121(36.0) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Rural | 172(51.3)* | 1.3(0.8–2.0) | 2.9(1.8–4.6) | 2.4(1.5–3.9) | |
| Age Group | |||||
| ≥ 40 years | 177(41.5) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| < 40 years | 116(46.5) | 1.3(0.9–2.1) | 1.6(1.1–2.5) | 1.3(0.8–2.1) | |
| Marital status | |||||
| Couple | 172(42.8) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Non-Couple | 121(45.0) | 1.2(0.8–1.8) | 1.0(0.6–1.6) | ||
| Education Level | |||||
| Secondary/above | 16(19.8) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| No formal or having primary | 277(46.9)* | 4.4(2.0–9.7) | 4.4(2.0–9.8) | 2.7(1.2–6.3) | 1.6(0.7–4.0) |
| Ever measured BP in life | |||||
| Yes | 132(42.3) | 1 | 1 | ||
| No | 161(44.8) | 1.1(0.7–1.6) | 1.1(0.7–1.8) | ||
| Ever measured Blood Glucose in life | |||||
| Yes | 27(42.9) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| No | 266(43.8) | 0.7(0.3–1.3) | 1.9(0.8–4.2) | 1.1(0.5–2.7) | |
| Being aware that HIV/ART can cause T2DM or HTN | |||||
| Yes | 26(32.5) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| No | 267(45.2)‡ | 1.5(0.8–2.7) | 2.3(0.9–5.6) | 1.7(0.7–4.5) | |
| Currently has HIV & T2DM/HTN Co-morbidities | |||||
| Yes | 42(38.9) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| No | 251(44.6) | 0.8(0.5–1.4) | 2.7(1.3–5.7) | 2.0(1.2–4.6) | |
P-value for Chi-squire test results: *p < 0.0001 and ‡ p < 0.05, Odd Ratio (OR)