Amol A Verma1,2, Yishan Guo3, Janice L Kwan4,5, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw4, Shail Rawal4,6, Terence Tang4,7, Adina Weinerman4,8, Fahad Razak3,4,9,10. 1. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Room 714-3, 2 Queen St. East, Toronto, Ontario, M5C 3G7, Canada. amol.verma@mail.utoronto.ca. 2. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. amol.verma@mail.utoronto.ca. 3. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Room 714-3, 2 Queen St. East, Toronto, Ontario, M5C 3G7, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 5. Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 6. Division of General Internal Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. 7. Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Toronto, Canada. 8. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada. 9. Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, USA. 10. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding the most common and costly conditions treated by inpatient general medical services is important for implementing quality improvement, developing health policy, conducting research, and designing medical education. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and cost of conditions treated on general internal medicine (GIM) inpatient services. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study involving 7 hospital sites in Toronto, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: All patients discharged between April 1, 2010 and March 31, 2015 who were admitted to or discharged from an inpatient GIM service. MAIN MEASURES: Hospital administrative data were used to identify diagnoses and costs associated with admissions. The primary discharge diagnosis was identified for each admission and categorized into clinically relevant and mutually exclusive categories using the Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) tool. KEY RESULTS: Among 148,442 admissions, the most common primary discharge diagnoses were heart failure (5.1%), pneumonia (5.0%), urinary tract infection (4.6%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (4.5%), and stroke (4.4%). The prevalence of the 20 most common conditions was significantly correlated across hospitals (correlation coefficients ranging from 0.55 to 0.95, p ≤ 0.01 for all comparisons). No single condition represented more than 5.1% of all admissions or more than 7.9% of admissions at any hospital site. The costliest conditions were stroke (median cost $7122, interquartile range 5587-12,354, total cost $94,199,422, representing 6.0% of all costs) and the group of delirium, dementia, and cognitive disorders (median cost $12,831, IQR 9539-17,509, total cost $77,372,541, representing 4.9% of all costs). The 10 most common conditions accounted for only 36.2% of hospitalizations and 36.8% of total costs. The remaining hospitalizations included 223 different CCS conditions. CONCLUSIONS: GIM services care for a markedly heterogeneous population but the most common conditions were similar across 7 hospitals. The diversity of conditions cared for in GIM may be challenging for healthcare delivery and quality improvement. Initiatives that cut across individual diseases to address processes of care, patient experience, and functional outcomes may be more relevant to a greater proportion of the GIM population than disease-specific efforts.
BACKGROUND: Understanding the most common and costly conditions treated by inpatient general medical services is important for implementing quality improvement, developing health policy, conducting research, and designing medical education. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and cost of conditions treated on general internal medicine (GIM) inpatient services. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study involving 7 hospital sites in Toronto, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: All patients discharged between April 1, 2010 and March 31, 2015 who were admitted to or discharged from an inpatient GIM service. MAIN MEASURES: Hospital administrative data were used to identify diagnoses and costs associated with admissions. The primary discharge diagnosis was identified for each admission and categorized into clinically relevant and mutually exclusive categories using the Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) tool. KEY RESULTS: Among 148,442 admissions, the most common primary discharge diagnoses were heart failure (5.1%), pneumonia (5.0%), urinary tract infection (4.6%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (4.5%), and stroke (4.4%). The prevalence of the 20 most common conditions was significantly correlated across hospitals (correlation coefficients ranging from 0.55 to 0.95, p ≤ 0.01 for all comparisons). No single condition represented more than 5.1% of all admissions or more than 7.9% of admissions at any hospital site. The costliest conditions were stroke (median cost $7122, interquartile range 5587-12,354, total cost $94,199,422, representing 6.0% of all costs) and the group of delirium, dementia, and cognitive disorders (median cost $12,831, IQR 9539-17,509, total cost $77,372,541, representing 4.9% of all costs). The 10 most common conditions accounted for only 36.2% of hospitalizations and 36.8% of total costs. The remaining hospitalizations included 223 different CCS conditions. CONCLUSIONS: GIM services care for a markedly heterogeneous population but the most common conditions were similar across 7 hospitals. The diversity of conditions cared for in GIM may be challenging for healthcare delivery and quality improvement. Initiatives that cut across individual diseases to address processes of care, patient experience, and functional outcomes may be more relevant to a greater proportion of the GIM population than disease-specific efforts.
Entities:
Keywords:
cost; diagnoses; health services research; hospitalist; internal medicine
Authors: Karina W Davidson; Jonathan Shaffer; Siqin Ye; Louise Falzon; Iheanacho O Emeruwa; Kevin Sundquist; Ifeoma A Inneh; Susan L Mascitelli; Wilhelmina M Manzano; David K Vawdrey; Henry H Ting Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Vincenza Snow; Dennis Beck; Tina Budnitz; Doriane C Miller; Jane Potter; Robert L Wears; Kevin B Weiss; Mark V Williams Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Barbara Liu; Julia E Moore; Ummukulthum Almaawiy; Wai-Hin Chan; Sobia Khan; Joycelyne Ewusie; Jemila S Hamid; Sharon E Straus Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Shail Rawal; Janice L Kwan; Fahad Razak; Allan S Detsky; Yishan Guo; Lauren Lapointe-Shaw; Terence Tang; Adina Weinerman; Andreas Laupacis; S V Subramanian; Amol A Verma Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Carolyn Steele Gray; Terence Tang; Alana Armas; Mira Backo-Shannon; Sarah Harvey; Kerry Kuluski; Mayura Loganathan; Jason X Nie; John Petrie; Tim Ramsay; Robert Reid; Kednapa Thavorn; Ross Upshur; Walter P Wodchis; Michelle Nelson Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2020-11-25
Authors: Amol A Verma; Tejasvi Hora; Hae Young Jung; Michael Fralick; Sarah L Malecki; Lauren Lapointe-Shaw; Adina Weinerman; Terence Tang; Janice L Kwan; Jessica J Liu; Shail Rawal; Timothy C Y Chan; Angela M Cheung; Laura C Rosella; Marzyeh Ghassemi; Margaret Herridge; Muhammad Mamdani; Fahad Razak Journal: CMAJ Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Amol A Verma; Tejasvi Hora; Hae Young Jung; Michael Fralick; Sarah L Malecki; Lauren Lapointe-Shaw; Adina Weinerman; Terence Tang; Janice L Kwan; Jessica J Liu; Shail Rawal; Timothy C Y Chan; Angela M Cheung; Laura C Rosella; Marzyeh Ghassemi; Margaret Herridge; Muhammad Mamdani; Fahad Razak Journal: CMAJ Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 8.262