Finlay A McAlister1, Erik Youngson2, Jeffrey A Bakal2, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc2, Narmin Kassam2. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine (McAlister, Kassam); Patient Health Outcomes Research and Clinical Effectiveness Unit (McAlister, Youngson, Bakal), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Data Integration Measurement and Reporting (Bakal), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Holroyd-Leduc), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. Finlay.McAlister@ualberta.ca. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine (McAlister, Kassam); Patient Health Outcomes Research and Clinical Effectiveness Unit (McAlister, Youngson, Bakal), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Data Integration Measurement and Reporting (Bakal), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Holroyd-Leduc), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physician scores on examinations decline with time after graduation. However, whether this translates into declining quality of care is unknown. Our objective was to determine how physician experience is associated with negative outcomes for patients admitted to hospital. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving all patients admitted to general internal medicine wards over a 2-year period at all 7 teaching hospitals in Alberta, Canada. We used files from the Alberta College of Physicians and Surgeons to determine the number of years since medical school graduation for each patient's most responsible physician. Our primary outcome was the composite of in-hospital death, or readmission or death within 30 days postdischarge. RESULTS: We identified 10 046 patients who were cared for by 149 physicians. Patient characteristics were similar across physician experience strata, as were primary outcome rates (17.4% for patients whose care was managed by physicians in the highest quartile of experience, compared with 18.8% in those receiving care from the least experienced physicians; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-1.06). Outcomes were similar between experience quartiles when further stratified by physician volume, most responsible diagnosis or complexity of the patient's condition. Although we found substantial variability in length of stay between individual physicians, there were no significant differences between physician experience quartiles (mean adjusted for patient covariates and accounting for intraphysician clustering: 7.90 [95% CI 7.39-8.42] d for most experienced quartile; 7.63 [95% CI 7.13-8.14] d for least experienced quartile). INTERPRETATION: For patients admitted to general internal medicine teaching wards, we saw no negative association between physician experience and outcomes commonly used as proxies for quality of inpatient care.
BACKGROUND: Physician scores on examinations decline with time after graduation. However, whether this translates into declining quality of care is unknown. Our objective was to determine how physician experience is associated with negative outcomes for patients admitted to hospital. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving all patients admitted to general internal medicine wards over a 2-year period at all 7 teaching hospitals in Alberta, Canada. We used files from the Alberta College of Physicians and Surgeons to determine the number of years since medical school graduation for each patient's most responsible physician. Our primary outcome was the composite of in-hospital death, or readmission or death within 30 days postdischarge. RESULTS: We identified 10 046 patients who were cared for by 149 physicians. Patient characteristics were similar across physician experience strata, as were primary outcome rates (17.4% for patients whose care was managed by physicians in the highest quartile of experience, compared with 18.8% in those receiving care from the least experienced physicians; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-1.06). Outcomes were similar between experience quartiles when further stratified by physician volume, most responsible diagnosis or complexity of the patient's condition. Although we found substantial variability in length of stay between individual physicians, there were no significant differences between physician experience quartiles (mean adjusted for patient covariates and accounting for intraphysician clustering: 7.90 [95% CI 7.39-8.42] d for most experienced quartile; 7.63 [95% CI 7.13-8.14] d for least experienced quartile). INTERPRETATION: For patients admitted to general internal medicine teaching wards, we saw no negative association between physician experience and outcomes commonly used as proxies for quality of inpatient care.
Authors: Anita G Au; Finlay A McAlister; Jeffrey A Bakal; Justin Ezekowitz; Padma Kaul; Carl van Walraven Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2012-08-17 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Ellen Funkhouser; Thomas K Houston; Deborah A Levine; Joshua Richman; Jeroan J Allison; Catarina I Kiefe Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2010-12-07
Authors: Peter J Kaboli; Jorge T Go; Jason Hockenberry; Justin M Glasgow; Skyler R Johnson; Gary E Rosenthal; Michael P Jones; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Anita A Vashi; Justin P Fox; Brendan G Carr; Gail D'Onofrio; Jesse M Pines; Joseph S Ross; Cary P Gross Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-01-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: James S Goodwin; Habeeb Salameh; Jie Zhou; Siddhartha Singh; Yong-Fang Kuo; Ann B Nattinger Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Amol A Verma; Yishan Guo; Janice L Kwan; Lauren Lapointe-Shaw; Shail Rawal; Terence Tang; Adina Weinerman; Peter Cram; Irfan A Dhalla; Stephen W Hwang; Andreas Laupacis; Muhammad M Mamdani; Steven Shadowitz; Ross Upshur; Robert J Reid; Fahad Razak Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2017-12-13
Authors: Scott Reule; Robert Foley; Daniel Shaughnessy; Paul Drawz; Areef Ishani; Mark Rosenberg Journal: Hemodial Int Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 1.812