Literature DB >> 30054842

CEGP-003 Spray Has a Similar Hemostatic Effect to Epinephrine Injection in Cases of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Byoung Wook Bang1, Don Haeng Lee2, Hyung Kil Kim1, Kye Sook Kwon1, Yong Woon Shin1, Su Jin Hong3, Jong Ho Moon3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopically applicable hemostatic agents have been demonstrated to have high initial hemostasis rates in cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). AIMS: The authors developed a new hemostatic powder (CEGP-003) and evaluated its hemostatic and ulcer healing effects in UGIB.
METHODS: Patients with peptic ulcer or post-endoscopic resection bleeding were randomly assigned to be treated by epinephrine injection or CEGP-003 spray. All patients were placed under observation for 3 days and underwent second-look endoscopy. The primary outcome was initial hemostasis rate, and the secondary outcomes were rebleeding rate and ulcer healing effect.
RESULTS: Seventy-two patients with UGIB were enrolled in this study. Causes of bleeding were peptic ulcer (15, 20.5%), post-endoscopic mucosal resection (11, 15.1%), and post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding (47, 64.4%). Initial hemostasis was achieved in 89.2% (34/37) of patients in the epinephrine group and in 100% (35/35) in the CEGP-003 group (p = 0.115). Rebleeding occurred in 2.7% (1/37) and 8.6% (3/35) in the epinephrine and CEGP-003 groups, respectively (p = 0.35). Three days after endoscopic hemostasis, the ulcer healing effects of epinephrine and CEGP-003 were similar (p = 0.79).
CONCLUSION: This study shows that CEGP-003 spray has a hemostatic effect similar to epinephrine in terms of initial hemostasis and rebleeding rates. The authors consider CEGP-003 a potential therapeutic tool for UGIB as a definitive or bridge therapy and that it is particularly useful for oozing lesions after endoscopic resection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic; Gastrointestinal hemorrhage; Hemostasis; Hemostatic techniques; Wound healing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30054842     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5208-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  19 in total

Review 1.  Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: the next generation.

Authors:  J W Lee; J H Park; J R Robinson
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  Haemostatic actions of the folkloric medicinal plant extract Ankaferd Blood Stopper.

Authors:  H Goker; I C Haznedaroglu; S Ercetin; S Kirazli; U Akman; Y Ozturk; H C Firat
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 3.  Endoscopic hemostatic devices.

Authors:  Jason D Conway; Douglas G Adler; David L Diehl; Francis A Farraye; Sergey V Kantsevoy; Vivek Kaul; Sripathi R Kethu; Richard S Kwon; Petar Mamula; Sarah A Rodriguez; William M Tierney
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Endoscopic application of polysaccharide powder for hemostasis in anticoagulated pigs (with video).

Authors:  Georg Kaehler; Christina Dutenhoefner; Richard Magdeburg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Endoscopic haemostasis: an overview of procedures and clinical scenarios.

Authors:  Jérémie Jacques; Romain Legros; Stanislas Chaussade; Denis Sautereau
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.088

6.  Effect of scheduled second-look endoscopy on peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Soo Jung Park; Hyojin Park; Yong Chan Lee; Chang Hwan Choi; Tae Joo Jeon; Jun Chul Park; Jie-Hyun Kim; Young Hoon Youn; Yu Jin Kim; Jae Hak Kim; Kwang Jae Lee; Sun Gyo Lim; Hyungkil Kim; Byoung Wook Bang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Iwao Kaneko; Ritsuo Mouri; Mayuko Hirata; Toru Kawamura; Masaharu Yoshihara; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  A novel hemostatic powder for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter study (the "GRAPHE" registry).

Authors:  Sami Haddara; Jeremie Jacques; Stéphane Lecleire; Julien Branche; Sarah Leblanc; Yann Le Baleur; Jocelyn Privat; Laurent Heyries; Philippe Bichard; Philippe Granval; Ulriikka Chaput; Stephane Koch; Jonathan Levy; Bruno Godart; Antoine Charachon; Jean-François Bourgaux; Elodie Metivier-Cesbron; Edouard Chabrun; Vincent Quentin; Bastien Perrot; Geoffroy Vanbiervliet; Emmanuel Coron
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 9.  Hemostatic powder spray: a new method for managing gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Kinesh Changela; Haris Papafragkakis; Emmanuel Ofori; Mel A Ona; Mahesh Krishnaiah; Sushil Duddempudi; Sury Anand
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.409

10.  International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Alan N Barkun; Marc Bardou; Ernst J Kuipers; Joseph Sung; Richard H Hunt; Myriam Martel; Paul Sinclair
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Hemostatic powders for gastrointestinal bleeding: a review of old, new, and emerging agents in a rapidly advancing field.

Authors:  Shirley X Jiang; Daljeet Chahal; Nabil Ali-Mohamad; Christian Kastrup; Fergal Donnellan
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-08-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.