Literature DB >> 30054823

An Examination of Applicants and Factors Associated with Matriculation to Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship Training Programs.

Michael M Wach1, Samantha M Ruff1, Reed I Ayabe1, Sean P Martin1, Laurence P Diggs1, Imani A Alexander1, Seth M Steinberg2, Jeremy L Davis1, Jonathan M Hernandez3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The demand for training in complex general surgical oncology (CGSO) fellowships currently exceeds the number of positions offered; however, there are scarce data defining the applicant pool or characteristics associated with successful matriculation. Our study described the applicant population and to determine factors associated with acceptance into the fellowship. STUDY
DESIGN: Data were extracted from the Electronic Residency Application System for applicants in 2015 and 2016 and stratified based on matriculation status. Applicant demographics, including medical education, residency, and research achievements, were analyzed. Academic productivity was quantified using the number of peer-reviewed publications as well as the journal with the highest impact factor in which an applicant's work was published.
RESULTS: Data were gathered on a total of 283 applicants, of which 105 matriculated. The overall population was primarily male (63.2%), Caucasian (40.6%), educated at a U.S. allopathic medical school (53.4%), and trained at a university-based General Surgery residency (55.5%). Education at a U.S. allopathic school (OR = 5.63, p < 0.0001), university-based classification of the applicant's surgical residency (OR = 4.20, p < 0.0001), and a residency affiliation with a CGSO fellowship (OR = 2.61, p = 0.004) or National Cancer Institute designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (OR = 3.16, p < 0.001) were found to be associated with matriculation. Matriculants published a higher number of manuscripts than nonmatriculants (median of 10 vs. 4.5, p < 0.0001) and more frequently achieved publication in journals with higher impact factors (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first objective description of the CGSO fellowship applicant pool. Applicants' medical school, residency, and research data points correlated with successful matriculation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30054823      PMCID: PMC6191290          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6674-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  11 in total

1.  Cost considerations and applicant characteristics for the Pediatric Surgery Match.

Authors:  Danny C Little; Suzanne M Yoder; Tracy C Grikscheit; Carl-Christian A Jackson; Julie R Fuchs; Kimberly W McCrudden; George W Holcomb
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  Changing demographics of residents choosing fellowships: longterm data from the American Board of Surgery.

Authors:  Karen R Borman; Laura R Vick; Thomas W Biester; Marc E Mitchell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Trends in research time, fellowship training, and practice patterns among general surgery graduates.

Authors:  Michelle C Ellis; Birat Dhungel; Roshanthi Weerasinghe; John T Vetto; Karen Deveney
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  Analysis of the pediatric surgery match: factors predicting outcome.

Authors:  Jason D Fraser; Pablo Aguayo; Shawn St Peter; Dan J Ostlie; George W Holcomb; Walter A Andrews; J Patrick Murphy; Ronald J Sharp; Charles L Snyder
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Training and certification of the surgical oncologist.

Authors:  Russell S Berman; Ronald J Weigel
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12

6.  Research productivity of residents and surgeons with formal research training.

Authors:  Shaheed Merani; Noah Switzer; Ahmed Kayssi; Maurice Blitz; Najma Ahmed; A M James Shapiro
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Perceptions of graduating general surgery chief residents: are they confident in their training?

Authors:  Mark L Friedell; Thomas J VanderMeer; Michael L Cheatham; George M Fuhrman; Paul J Schenarts; John D Mellinger; Jon B Morris
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Qualities and characteristics of successfully matched North American HPB surgery fellowship candidates.

Authors:  Erin H Baker; Jacob E Dowden; Allyson R Cochran; David A Iannitti; Eric T Kimchi; Kevin F Staveley-O'Carroll; D Rohan Jeyarajah
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  The profile of successful applicants for endocrine surgery fellowships: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Afif N Kulaylat; Erin M Kenning; Charles H Chesnut; Benjamin C James; Jane R Schubart; Brian D Saunders
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Characteristics of highly ranked applicants to general surgery residency programs.

Authors:  Steven C Stain; Jonathan R Hiatt; Ashar Ata; Stanley W Ashley; Kevin K Roggin; John R Potts; Richard A Moore; Joseph M Galante; L D Britt; Karen E Deveney; E Christopher Ellison
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 14.766

View more
  6 in total

1.  Qualities and characteristics of applicants associated with successful matriculation to pediatric surgery fellowship training.

Authors:  Shreya Gupta; James D McDonald; Michael M Wach; Andrea T Badillo; Seth M Steinberg; Jeremy L Davis; Meera Kotagal; Aaron P Garrison; Jonathan M Hernandez
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  Survey of Surgical Oncology Fellowship Graduates 2005-2016: Insight into Initial Practice.

Authors:  Samantha Ruff; Sadia Ilyas; Seth M Steinberg; Zaria Tatalovich; Sarah A McLaughlin; Michael D'Angelica; Chandrajit P Raut; Keith A Delman; Jonathan M Hernandez; Jeremy L Davis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Effect of Surgeon Factors on Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Therapy in Older Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith; Xiudong Lei; Kevin Diao; Ying Xu; Yu Shen; Grace L Smith; Sharon H Giordano; Sarah M DeSnyder; Kelly K Hunt; Mediget Teshome; Reshma Jagsi; Simona F Shaitelman; Susan K Peterson; Cameron W Swanick
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Evaluation of Factors Associated With Successful Matriculation to Colon and Rectal Surgery Fellowship.

Authors:  Mackenzie L Shindorf; Amy R Copeland; Shreya Gupta; Seth M Steinberg; Scott R Steele; Heather L Yeo; Julian A Sanchez; Jonathan M Hernandez
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.412

5.  Application and Match Rates in the Complex General Surgical Oncology Match.

Authors:  Jason Silvestre; Jessica R Smith; Kindha E Nasef; Lori L Wilson; Rachel R Kelz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.339

6.  Supply and Demand: Is the Surgical Oncology Match in a Bear Market?

Authors:  Dan G Blazer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.339

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.