Literature DB >> 25130386

Research productivity of residents and surgeons with formal research training.

Shaheed Merani1, Noah Switzer1, Ahmed Kayssi2, Maurice Blitz2, Najma Ahmed2, A M James Shapiro3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The spectrum of the surgeon-scientist ranges from a clinician who participates in the occasional research collaboration to the predominantly academic scientist with no involvement in clinical work. Training surgeon-scientists can involve resource-intense and lengthy training programs, including Masters and PhD degrees. Despite high enrollment rates in such programs, limited data exist regarding their outcome. The aim of the study was to investigate the scientific productivity of general surgeons who completed Masters or PhD graduate training compared with those who completed clinical residency training only.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of graduates of general surgery residency was conducted over 2 decades. Data regarding graduation year, dedicated research training type, as well as publication volume, authorship role, and publication impact of surgeons during and after training, were analyzed.
SETTING: The study was conducted in 2 general surgery residency training programs in Canada (University of Alberta and University of Toronto). PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of 323 surgeons who completed general surgery residency between 1998 and 2012.
RESULTS: Overall, 25% of surgeons obtained graduate-level research degrees. Surgeons with graduate degrees were proportionately more likely to participate in research publications both during training (100% of PhD, 82% of Masters, and 38% of clinical-only graduates, p < 0.05) and after training (91% of PhD, 81% of Masters, and 44% of clinical-only graduates, p < 0.05). Among surgeons involved in publication, the individual publication volume and impact of publication were highest among those with PhD degrees, as compared with clinical-only or Masters training.
CONCLUSIONS: The volume and impact of research publication of PhD-trained surgeon-scientists are significantly higher than those having clinical-only and Masters training. The additional 1 or 2 years of training to obtain a PhD over a Masters degree significantly nurtures trainees to hone research skills within a supervised environment and should be encouraged for research-inclined residents.
Copyright © 2014 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Professionalism; Systems-Based Practice; education; general surgery; research; residency; surgeon-scientist

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25130386     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  10 in total

1.  Career and research outcomes of the physician-scientist training program at the University of Calgary: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jason T Bau; Alexandra D Frolkis; Nabeela Nathoo; Bryan G Yipp; Morley D Hollenberg; Paul L Beck
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-05-15

2.  Training Patterns and Lifetime Career Achievements of US Academic Cardiothoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Carlo Maria Rosati; Nakul P Valsangkar; Mario Gaudino; David Blitzer; Panos N Vardas; Leonard N Girardi; Mark W Turrentine; John W Brown; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  CanMEDS scholars: A national survey on urology residents' attitudes towards research during training.

Authors:  Ogi Solaja; Thomas A A Skinner; Thomas B Mcgregor; D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  An Examination of Applicants and Factors Associated with Matriculation to Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship Training Programs.

Authors:  Michael M Wach; Samantha M Ruff; Reed I Ayabe; Sean P Martin; Laurence P Diggs; Imani A Alexander; Seth M Steinberg; Jeremy L Davis; Jonathan M Hernandez
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Impact of PhD Degree Versus Non-PhD Research Fellowship on Future Research Productivity Among Academic Cardiothoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Simar S Bajaj; Hanjay Wang; Kiah M Williams; Joseph C Heiler; Joshua M Pickering; Keerthi Manjunatha; Christian T O'Donnell; Mark Sanchez; Jack H Boyd
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Association between academic degrees and research productivity: an assessment of Canadian academic general surgeons.

Authors:  Kieran Purich; Kevin Verhoeff; Alexander Miles; Janice Y Kung; A M James Shapiro; David Bigam
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Best practices for enhancing surgical research: a perspective from the Canadian Association of Chairs of Surgical Research

Authors:  Alp Sener; Colin C. Anderson; Francois A. Auger; Jake Barralet; Mary Brindle; Francisco S. Cayabyab; Michael G. Fehlings; Louis Lacombe; Louis P. Perrault; Robert Sabbagh; Andrew J.E. Seely; Christopher Wallace; James Ellsmere; Richard Keijzer
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Variability in research productivity among Canadian surgical specialties.

Authors:  Henry Wang; Michael W A Chu; Luc Dubois
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Research Productivity of Canadian Radiation Oncology Residents: A Time-Trend Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Mutsaers; Sangyang Jia; Andrew Warner; Timothy K Nguyen; Joanna M Laba; David A Palma
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Low immediate scientific yield of the PhD among medical doctors.

Authors:  Emil L Fosbøl; Philip L Fosbøl; Sofie Rerup; Lauge Østergaard; Mohammed H Ahmed; Jawad Butt; Julie Davidsen; Nirusiya Shanmuganathan; Simon Juul; Christian Lewinter
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 2.463

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.