| Literature DB >> 30053915 |
Petar Scepanovic1,2, Cécile Alanio3,4,5, Christian Hammer1,2,6, Flavia Hodel1,2, Jacob Bergstedt7, Etienne Patin8,9,10, Christian W Thorball1,2, Nimisha Chaturvedi1,2, Bruno Charbit4, Laurent Abel11,12,13, Lluis Quintana-Murci8,9,10, Darragh Duffy3,4,5, Matthew L Albert14, Jacques Fellay15,16,17.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Humoral immune responses to infectious agents or vaccination vary substantially among individuals, and many of the factors responsible for this variability remain to be defined. Current evidence suggests that human genetic variation influences (i) serum immunoglobulin levels, (ii) seroconversion rates, and (iii) intensity of antigen-specific immune responses. Here, we evaluated the impact of intrinsic (age and sex), environmental, and genetic factors on the variability of humoral response to common pathogens and vaccines.Entities:
Keywords: Age; GWAS; HLA; Human genomics; Humoral immunity; Immunoglobulins; Infection; Serology; Sex; Vaccination
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30053915 PMCID: PMC6063007 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-018-0568-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Med ISSN: 1756-994X Impact factor: 11.117
Fig. 1Age and sex impact on serostatus. a Effect sizes of significant linear associations (adjusted P values (adj. P < 0.05)) between age and serostatus as determined based on clinical-grade serologies in the 1000 healthy individuals from the Milieu Intérieur cohort. Effect sizes were estimated in a generalized linear mixed model, with serostatus as response variable, and age and sex as treatment variables. This model includes both scaled linear and quadratic terms for the age variable. Scaling was achieved by centering age variable at the mean age. All results from this analysis are provided in Additional file 1: Table S5. Dots represent the mean of the beta. Lines represent the 95% confidence intervals. b Odds of being seropositive towards EBV EBNA (Profile 1; upper left), Toxoplasma gondii (Profile 2; upper right), Helicobacter Pylori (Profile 3; bottom left), and HBs antigen of HBV (Profile 4; bottom right), as a function of age in men (blue) and women (red) in the 1000 healthy donors. Indicated P values were obtained using a logistic regression with Wald test, with serostatus binary variables (seropositive versus seronegative) as the response, and age and sex as treatments. Similar plots from all examined serologies are provided in Additional file 2: Figure S5. c Effect sizes of significant associations (adjusted P values (adj. P < 0.05) between sex (men = reference vs. women) and serostatus. Effect sizes were estimated in a generalized linear mixed model, with serostatus as response variable, and age and sex as treatment variables. All results from this analysis are provided in Additional file 1: Table S5. Dots represent the mean of the beta. Lines represent the 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 2Age and sex impact on total and antigen-specific antibody levels. a Relationships between Log10-transformed IgG (upper left), IgA (upper right), IgM (bottom left), and IgE (bottom right) levels and age. Regression lines were fitted using linear regression, with Log10-transformed total antibody levels as response variable, and age and sex as treatment variables. Indicated adj. P were obtained using the mixed model and corrected for multiple testing using the FDR method. b, c Effect sizes of significant associations (adjusted P values (adj. P < 0.05) between age (b) and sex (c) on Log10-transformed antigen-specific IgG levels in the 1000 healthy individuals from the Milieu Intérieur cohort. Because of low number of seropositive donors (n = 15), HBc serology was removed from this analysis. Effect sizes were estimated in a linear mixed model, with Log10-transformed antigen-specific IgG levels as response variables, and age and sex as treatment variables. All results from this analysis are provided in Additional file 1: Table S5. Dots represent the mean of the beta. Lines represent the 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 3Association between host genetic variants and serological phenotypes. Manhattan plots of association results for a EBV anti-EBNA IgG and b rubella IgG levels. The dashed horizontal line denotes genome-wide significance (P = 2.6 × 10−9)
Associations of EBV EBNA and rubella antigens with HLA (SNP, allele, and amino acid position)
| Phenotype | ||
|---|---|---|
| EBV EBNA IgG levels | Rubella IgG levels | |
| SNP | ||
| ID (Allele) | rs74951723 (A) | rs115118356 (G) |
| P-value | 3 × 10−14 | 7.68 × 10−10 |
| Beta (95% CI) | 0.29 (0.21, 0.36) | −0.11 (− 0.15, − 0.08) |
| Classical HLA allele | ||
| Allele | HLA-DQB1*03:01 | HLA-DPB1*03:01 |
| | 1.26 × 10−7 | 3.8 × 10−6 |
| Beta (95% CI) | 0.17 (0.11, 0.23) | − 0.12 (− 0.18, − 0.07) |
| Amino acid | ||
| Protein (position) | HLA-DRβ1 (56) | HLA-DPβ1 (8) |
| Omnibus | 2.53 × 10−11 | 1.12 × 10−9 |
Association testing between KIR-HLA interactions and serology phenotypes
| Phenotype | KIR | HLA | Estimate | Std. error | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgA levels | KIR3DL1 | HLA-B*14:02 | 0.456 | 0.077 | 3.9 × 10−09 |
| IgA levels | KIR2DS4 | HLA-B*14:02 | 0.454 | 0.077 | 4.5 × 10−09 |
| IgA levels | KIR3DL1 | HLA-C*08:02 | 0.449 | 0.076 | 4.9 × 10−09 |
| IgA levels | KIR2DS4 | HLA-C*08:02 | 0.448 | 0.076 | 5.7 × 10−09 |
Significant associations of rare variants collapsed per gene set with IgA levels
| Phenotype | Chromosome | Gene |
| No. of rare markers | No. of Common Markers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgA levels | 2 | ACADL | 3.42 × 10−11 | 18.09 | 5 | 2 |
| 2 | TMEM131 | 7.83 × 10−11 | 17.89 | 13 | 2 |