| Literature DB >> 30053902 |
Zhigang Wu1, Hongwei Wang2, Fubiao Ni2, Xuan Jiang3, Ziqiang Xu4, Chengyang Liu5, Yong Cai4, Hongxing Fu3, Jiao Luo2, Wenwei Chen6, Bicheng Chen7, Zhixian Yu8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glycaemic control is one of the most effective strategies for the treatment of diabetes-related erectile dysfunction (DMED). Compared to conventional anti-diabetic drugs and insulin, islet transplantation is more effective in the treatment of diabetic complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of islet transplantation for reversing advanced-stage DMED in rats and to observe its influence on corpus cavernosum fibrosis.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Erectile dysfunction; TGF-β1; α-SMA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30053902 PMCID: PMC6064149 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-018-0276-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Endocr Disord ISSN: 1472-6823 Impact factor: 2.763
Fig. 1Evaluation of islet activity and body weights and blood glucose levels over 16 weeks. a Evaluation of activity in the isolated islets (FDA-PI staining, × 100). Bar = 25 μm. b Immunohistochemical staining for insulin as brown areas, which stains transplanted islets under the kidney capsule (magnification × 200). Bar = 25 μm. c Body weight changes over 16 weeks and the arrow indicates 12 weeks as the start of treatment. d Nonfasting blood glucose levels for each group over 16 weeks and the arrow indicates 12 weeks as the start of treatment. Model group: diabetes-related erectile dysfunction rat models established at 12 weeks. Control = normal control, ED = diabetes-related erectile dysfunction, INS = insulin treatment, IT = islet transplantation
Fig. 2Evaluation of erectile function. Apomorphine experiments are performed to evaluate erectile function in each group. Values are presented mean ± standard deviation of the mean and the differences among groups are analysed using one-way ANOVA; **P < 0.01 vs. the Control group; *P < 0.05and**P < 0.01vs. the ED group;#P < 0.01 vs. the INS group. Control = normal control, ED = diabetes-related erectile dysfunction, INS = insulin treatment, IT = islet transplantation
Fig. 3Masson’s trichrome staining and immunohistochemical staining. a Penis samples are prepared for the detection of corpus cavernosum tissue fibrosis using Masson’s trichrome staining (magnification × 100). The smooth muscle components appeared red colour. The collagen components appear blue colour. Bar = 25 μm. b Immunohistochemical staining for α-SMA as brown areas, which stains smooth muscle cell(SMC) in the corpus cavernosum (magnification × 200). Bar = 50 μm. c Immunohistochemical staining for caspase-3 as brown areas, which stains SMCs apoptosis in the corpus cavernosum(magnification × 200). Bar = 50 μm. d Semiquantitative image analysis of muscle/collagen ratio in corpus cavernosum tissues was performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 soft. e Semiquantitative image analysis of α-SMA expression in corpus cavernosum. f Apoptotic index presented as the ratio of apoptotic SMCs (expression of caspase-3) to the total SMCs in corpus cavernosum. Values are presented mean ± standard deviation of the mean and the differences among groups are analysed using one-way ANOVA; +P < 0.001 vs. the Control group; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 vs. the ED group; ## P < 0.01 and ### P < 0.001 vs. the INS group. Control = normal control, ED = diabetes-related erectile dysfunction, INS = insulin treatment, IT = islet transplantation
Fig. 4Western blot analysis. a Western blot analysis showing the protein expression levels of P-Smad2 and Smad2in rat corpus cavernosum tissues. b The expression of CTGF is measured by Western blot in rat corpus cavernosum tissues. c The expression of TGF-β1 is measured by Western blot in rat corpus cavernosum tissues. d Data are presented as the relative density of phospho-Smad2 compared with that of total Smad2. e-f β-actin is used as loading control and data are presented as the relative density of CTGF and TGF-β1 compared with that of β-actin. Values are presented mean ± standard deviation of the mean and the differences among groups are analysed using one-way ANOVA; +P < 0.001 vs. the Control group; *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 vs. the ED group; #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 vs. the INS group.Control = normal control, ED = diabetes-related erectile dysfunction, INS = insulin treatment, IT = islet transplantation