| Literature DB >> 24517268 |
J Lundberg1, S Stone-Elander, X-M Zhang, O Korsgren, S Jonsson, S Holmin.
Abstract
Insulin-producing cells are transplanted by portal vein injection as an alternative to pancreas transplantation in both clinical and preclinical trials. Two of the main limitations of portal vein transplantation are the prompt activation of the innate immunity and concomitant loss of islets and a small but significant risk of portal vein thrombosis. Furthermore, to mimic physiological release, the insulin-producing cells should instead be located in the pancreas. The trans-vessel wall approach is an endovascular method for penetrating the vessel wall from the inside. In essence, a working channel is established to the parenchyma of organs that are difficult to access by percutaneous technique. In this experiment, we accessed the extra-vascular pancreatic parenchyma in swine by microendovascular technique and injected methylene blue, contrast fluids and insulin-producing cells without acute adverse events. Further, we evaluated the procedure itself by a 1-year angiographical follow-up, without adverse events. This study shows that the novel approach utilizing endovascular minimal invasiveness coupled to accurate trans-vessel wall placement of an injection in the pancreatic parenchyma with insulin-producing cells is possible. In clinical practice, the potential benefits compared to portal vein cell transplantation should significantly improve endocrine function of the graft and potentially reduce adverse events.Entities:
Keywords: Endovascular; SPECT/CT; islet transplantation; minimal-invasive transplantation; swine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24517268 PMCID: PMC4285323 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN: 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086
Figure 1Radiological images from the trans-vessel wall intervention in the pancreas and an angiographic follow-up 1 year later. (A) An example of a CT reconstruction with axial orientation from the XperCT algorithm reconstructed from raw data of the C-arm. (B) A 3D reconstruction of the aorta, celiac trunk and the posterior pancreatic artery (PPA), marked with arrow. Also marked are the proper hepatic artery (PHA) and splenic artery (SA). (C) Primary intervention within the PPA segment followed with (D), the same vessel 1 year later.
Figure 2Access to the pancreas for injection of dye and insulin-producing cells. (A) Methylene blue injected through the working channel. (B) DiI (red)-marked insulin-producing cells within the pancreas parenchyma counter stained for insulin (green). (C) Frontal projection and (D) axial projection of SPECT/CT fusion images showing Indium-111-labeled insulin-producing cells within the pancreas parenchyma.
Plasma biochemical analysis
| Subjet no. | Pancreatic amylase | Lipase | CRP | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preimplantation (µkat/L) | One week (µkat/L) | One month (µkat/L) | One year (µkat/L) | One year (µkat/L) | Preimplant (mg/L) | One week (mg/L) | One month (mg/L) | One year (mg/L) | |
| 01 | 31.9 | 34.73 | 35.96 | 31.29 | 0.17 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| 02 | 37.18 | 104.12 | 38.15 | 33.35 | 0.17 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| 03 | 40.87 | 64.46 | 40.66 | 41.62 | 0.3 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| 04 | 40.65 | 58.59 | 37.8 | 35.17 | 0.19 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| 05 | 31.38 | 33.01 | 31.99 | 32.67 | 0.23 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| 06 | 34.32 | 50.66 | 39.76 | 38.54 | 0.23 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| 07 | 52.26 | 34.38 | 32.87 | 45.4 | 0.22 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| 08 | 30.88 | 39.86 | 33.29 | 27.48 | 0.31 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| 09 | 32.99 | 25.86 | 34.52 | 39.32 | 0.26 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| 10 | 41.36 | 47.66 | 47.23 | 41.45 | 0.29 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |