Literature DB >> 30053455

Highly malignant routine EEG predicts poor prognosis after cardiac arrest in the Target Temperature Management trial.

S Backman1, T Cronberg2, H Friberg3, S Ullén4, J Horn5, J Kjaergaard6, C Hassager7, M Wanscher8, N Nielsen9, E Westhall10.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Routine EEG is widely used and accessible for post arrest neuroprognostication. Recent studies, using standardised EEG terminology, have proposed highly malignant EEG patterns with promising predictive ability.
OBJECTIVES: To validate the performance of standardised routine EEG patterns to predict neurological outcome after cardiac arrest.
METHODS: In the prospective multicenter Target Temperature Management trial, comatose cardiac arrest patients were randomised to different temperature levels (950 patients, 36 sites). According to the prospective protocol a routine EEG was performed in patients who remained comatose after the 36 h temperature control intervention. EEGs were retrospectively reviewed blinded to outcome using the standardised American Clinical Neurophysiology Society terminology. Highly malignant, malignant and benign EEG patterns were correlated to poor and good outcome, defined by best achieved Cerebral Performance Category up to 180 days.
RESULTS: At 20 sites 207 patients had a routine EEG performed at median 76 h after cardiac arrest. Highly malignant patterns (suppression or burst-suppression with or without discharges) had a high specificity for poor outcome (98%, CI 92-100), but with limited sensitivity (31%, CI 24-39). Our false positive patient had a burst-suppression pattern during ongoing sedation. A benign EEG, i.e. continuous normal-voltage background without malignant features, identified patients with good outcome with 77% (CI 66-86) sensitivity and 80% (CI 73-86) specificity.
CONCLUSION: Highly malignant routine EEG after targeted temperature management is a strong predictor of poor outcome. A benign EEG is an important indicator of a good outcome for patients remaining in coma. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACNS nomenclature; Cardiac arrest; Coma; EEG; Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy; Outcome prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30053455     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  22 in total

1.  EEG-based outcome prediction after cardiac arrest with convolutional neural networks: Performance and visualization of discriminative features.

Authors:  Stefan Jonas; Andrea O Rossetti; Mauro Oddo; Simon Jenni; Paolo Favaro; Frederic Zubler
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Resuscitating the Globally Ischemic Brain: TTM and Beyond.

Authors:  Melika Hosseini; Robert H Wilson; Christian Crouzet; Arya Amirhekmat; Kevin S Wei; Yama Akbari
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Bayesian Outcome Prediction After Resuscitation From Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Jonathan Elmer; Patrick J Coppler; Bobby L Jones; Daniel S Nagin; Clifton W Callaway
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 11.800

Review 4.  Recent applications of quantitative electroencephalography in adult intensive care units: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Sung-Min Cho; Eva K Ritzl; Jaeho Hwang
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 6.682

Review 5.  Protocolized Post-Cardiac Arrest Care with Targeted Temperature Management.

Authors:  Wei-Ting Chen; Min-Shan Tsai; Chien-Hua Huang; Wei-Tien Chang; Wen-Jone Chen
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 1.800

Review 6.  Prediction of poor neurological outcome in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a systematic review.

Authors:  Claudio Sandroni; Sonia D'Arrigo; Sofia Cacciola; Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers; Marlijn J A Kamps; Mauro Oddo; Fabio S Taccone; Arianna Di Rocco; Frederick J A Meijer; Erik Westhall; Massimo Antonelli; Jasmeet Soar; Jerry P Nolan; Tobias Cronberg
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Unsupervised learning of early post-arrest brain injury phenotypes.

Authors:  Jonathan Elmer; Patrick J Coppler; Teresa L May; Karen Hirsch; John Faro; Pawan Solanki; McKenzie Brown; Jacob S Puyana; Jon C Rittenberger; Clifton W Callaway
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines 2021: post-resuscitation care.

Authors:  Jerry P Nolan; Claudio Sandroni; Bernd W Böttiger; Alain Cariou; Tobias Cronberg; Hans Friberg; Cornelia Genbrugge; Kirstie Haywood; Gisela Lilja; Véronique R M Moulaert; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Theresa Mariero Olasveengen; Markus B Skrifvars; Fabio Taccone; Jasmeet Soar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Does electroencephalographic burst suppression still play a role in the perioperative setting?

Authors:  Francisco Almeida Lobo; Susana Vacas; Andrea O Rossetti; Chiara Robba; Fabio Silvio Taccone
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2020-10-31

10.  Adult Advanced Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Katherine M Berg; Lars W Andersen; Bernd W Böttiger; Sofia Cacciola; Clifton W Callaway; Keith Couper; Tobias Cronberg; Sonia D'Arrigo; Charles D Deakin; Michael W Donnino; Ian R Drennan; Asger Granfeldt; Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers; Mathias J Holmberg; Cindy H Hsu; Marlijn Kamps; Szymon Musiol; Kevin J Nation; Robert W Neumar; Tonia Nicholson; Brian J O'Neil; Quentin Otto; Edison Ferreira de Paiva; Michael J A Parr; Joshua C Reynolds; Claudio Sandroni; Barnaby R Scholefield; Markus B Skrifvars; Tzong-Luen Wang; Wolfgang A Wetsch; Joyce Yeung; Peter T Morley; Laurie J Morrison; Michelle Welsford; Mary Fran Hazinski; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.