Literature DB >> 30053267

dbCAN-seq: a database of carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme) sequence and annotation.

Le Huang1, Han Zhang1, Peizhi Wu1, Sarah Entwistle2, Xueqiong Li2, Tanner Yohe3, Haidong Yi1, Zhenglu Yang1, Yanbin Yin2.   

Abstract

Carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZymes) are not only the most important enzymes for bioenergy and agricultural industries, but also very important for human health, in that human gut microbiota encode hundreds of CAZyme genes in their genomes for degrading various dietary and host carbohydrates. We have built an online database dbCAN-seq (http://cys.bios.niu.edu/dbCAN_seq) to provide pre-computed CAZyme sequence and annotation data for 5,349 bacterial genomes. Compared to the other CAZyme resources, dbCAN-seq has the following new features: (i) a convenient download page to allow batch download of all the sequence and annotation data; (ii) an annotation page for every CAZyme to provide the most comprehensive annotation data; (iii) a metadata page to organize the bacterial genomes according to species metadata such as disease, habitat, oxygen requirement, temperature, metabolism; (iv) a very fast tool to identify physically linked CAZyme gene clusters (CGCs) and (v) a powerful search function to allow fast and efficient data query. With these unique utilities, dbCAN-seq will become a valuable web resource for CAZyme research, with a focus complementary to dbCAN (automated CAZyme annotation server) and CAZy (CAZyme family classification and reference database).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30053267      PMCID: PMC5753378          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


INTRODUCTION

Significance of CAZymes

CAZymes (carbohydrate-active enzymes) are involved in complex carbohydrate metabolism. They are responsible for the synthesis (through glycosyltransferases [GTs]), degradation (glycoside hydrolases [GHs], polysaccharide lyases [PLs], carbohydrate esterases [CEs], and enzymes for the auxiliary activities [AAs]) and recognition (carbohydrate-binding module [CBM]) of all the carbohydrates on Earth (1). CAZymes are found in all living organisms (typically 1–3% of the gene content) and particularly abundant (>3% of the gene content) in plants and plant degrading/saprophytic/pathogenic microbes (2–4) (Table 1). The reason is that a large number of CAZymes are needed to build (in plants) and degrade (in microbes) the complex carbohydrates of plant cell walls. Particularly, microbes living in the animal guts encode the highest percentage of CAZymes degrading various diet-derived carbohydrates and host carbohydrates (Table 1), and changing the dietary carbohydrates has a major impact on the microbiota structure in the human guts and further influences the human health (5,6).
Table 1.

CAZymes are most abundant in plants and plant-associated microbes

Organism# of CAZymes% of gene content
Arabidopsis thaliana (plant) 1,1344.1%
Aspergillus oryzae (plant-associated fungus) 5063.9%
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (human gut bacterium) 3918.2%
Escherichia coli MG1655 (laboratory bacterium) 1062.6%
Homo sapiens (human) 3401.7%

Similar online resources

The CAZy database (1) started to collect experimentally characterized CAZyme proteins from literature and classify them into protein families based on sequence similarity since 1990s. It then populated each family by including homologs of the characterized seed proteins from GenBank, UniProt and PDB databases. Although CAZy is most well known as a CAZyme classification database, it also provides an HTML page for each CAZyme family, presenting that family's known enzymatic activities (i.e. EC numbers), as well as information about its member proteins, e.g. protein IDs, names, and species. However, it does not provide a way to download CAZyme sequence and annotation data, nor a sequence search service to automatically annotate given genomes for CAZymes. In 2012, we developed a web server, dbCAN (7), together with two other tools CAT (8) and Hotpep (9) developed by others, to allow automated CAZyme annotation for newly sequenced genomes/metagenomes. Updated and well maintained every year, dbCAN has become the most popular automated CAZyme annotation server. Since 2012, we were frequently contacted by dbCAN users about the availability of pre-computed CAZyme sequence and annotation data for sequenced/published genomes and metagenomes. In 2014, we developed a pre-computed CAZyme database for fully sequenced plant and algal genomes named PlantCAZyme (10). Furthermore, a survey of publications citing dbCAN using Google Scholar found that dbCAN has been most frequently used to annotate microbial genomes and metagenomes (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

dbCAN has been cited in various research fields.

dbCAN has been cited in various research fields.

Motivations

Apparently, other than plant biologists, there are substantially more researchers from a variety of research fields (Figure 1), such as genomics, carbohydrate, bioenergy, plant disease, food security, microbial ecology, and human microbiome, who are more interested in microbial CAZymes. Hence, with tens of thousands of bacterial genomes available, we built the dbCAN-seq database (http://cys.bios.niu.edu/dbCAN_seq), aiming to provide a one-stop online database with the most comprehensive pre-computed microbial CAZyme sequence and annotation data.

DATABASE CONTENT

CAZyme identification and annotation

We scanned 5,349 completely assembled bacterial genomes (proteomes) of the RefSeq database to identify CAZymes. These 5,349 genomes are from 4,056 unique taxonomic IDs and 2,192 unique species (Supplementary Table S1), meaning that one species can have different taxonomic IDs and strains, and one taxonomic ID can also have different genome assemblies of different GCF (RefSeq assembly) IDs. Specifically, we followed the stand-alone dbCAN annotation pipeline (http://csbl.bmb.uga.edu/dbCAN/download/readme.txt), to keep dbCAN hits with E-value < 1e–5 and coverage > 0.3. We found in total 572,269 CAZyme homologs in 5,329 bacterial genomes. If using a more stringent threshold (E-value < 1e–18 and coverage > 0.35), 330,307 homologs of 5,288 bacterial genomes will remain. According to a benchmark analysis similar to (10), this stringent threshold resulted in an F-measure = 2 × (Recall × Precision)/(Recall + Precision) at 90.1% for Escherichia coli MG1655, 93.1% for Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27405, and 89.9% for Anaerocellum thermophilum DSM 6725 (Supplementary Tables S2–S4). In our website, we still provided the data for the 572,269 CAZyme homologs together with the E-value and coverage information in case the users want to filter the homologs for more reliable CAZymes. Figure 2 shows a box plot of the percentage of CAZymes (the number of CAZymes divided by the total number of proteins in a proteome). It is clear that Acidobacteria (8 genomes), Verrucomicrobia (10 genomes), Bacteroidetes (184 genomes), and Thermotogae (32 genomes) are among the top bacterial phyla having the highest percentages, which tend to also have higher fractions of carbohydrate-degrading enzymes (GH+CE+PL in the pie charts of Figure 2). This is not surprising as bacteria of these phyla are well known for their ability to degrade various complex carbohydrates in plant/algal material-rich environments such as animal guts, marine sediment, and soils (11–14).
Figure 2.

CAZymes in different phyla. Pie charts (left): the relative fraction of different CAZyme classes, which include GTs (glycosyltransferases), GHs (glycoside hydrolases), PLs (polysaccharide lyases), CEs (carbohydrate esterases), AAs (enzymes of the auxiliary activities), and CBMs (carbohydrate-binding modules). Box plots (right): the percentage of CAZymes in different bacterial phyla. The number in the parentheses is the number of genomes.

CAZymes in different phyla. Pie charts (left): the relative fraction of different CAZyme classes, which include GTs (glycosyltransferases), GHs (glycoside hydrolases), PLs (polysaccharide lyases), CEs (carbohydrate esterases), AAs (enzymes of the auxiliary activities), and CBMs (carbohydrate-binding modules). Box plots (right): the percentage of CAZymes in different bacterial phyla. The number in the parentheses is the number of genomes. After extracted the CAZyme protein sequences, we further performed extensive functional annotation for each CAZyme, including predictions of enzyme EC numbers using E2P2 (15), dbCAN signature domains (7), CDD functional domains (16), sequence homologs in databases CAZy (1), PDB (17), Swiss-Prot (18), as well as predictions of signal peptides using SignalP (19), lipoproteins using LipoP (20), and transmembrane domains using TMHMM (21), and lastly, protein secondary structures using PSSpred (22). We also collected data from the RefSeq database and calculated the basic information for each CAZyme, e.g. protein length, molecular weight, isoelectric point, genomic location and genomic context (gene neighborhood).

CAZyme gene clusters (CGCs) identification

Human gut-associated Bacteroidetes genomes were found to encode dozens of polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs), defined as physically linked genes specializing in the breakdown of various dietary fiber carbohydrates (23–26). A recent computational PUL prediction was performed in 67 Bacteroidetes genomes using SusC (sugar transporter) and SusD (glycan binding protein) genes as signature genes and CAZymes as accessory genes (27). The finding of PULs strongly suggests that CAZymes often work together with each other and with transcription factors (TFs) and transporters (TCs) to synergistically degrade/synthesize various highly complex carbohydrates. It is very likely that in nature there exist numerous PUL-like gene clusters in more bacteria in addition to Bacteroidetes, which may contain other transporters than SusC/D. Identifying CAZyme-containing gene clusters and presenting them on the web will be a valuable resource to the carbohydrate research community, especially to researchers interested in identifying and characterizing new PULs using wet-lab approaches. We defined a more general term CAZyme gene clusters (CGCs) to be physically linked gene clusters that must contain three different classes of signature genes: (i) CAZymes, (ii) TFs and (iii) TCs. Between two adjacent signature genes, a small number of non-signature genes are also allowed (Figure 3A). CAZyme identification was already described above. For the other two classes of signature genes, we searched against TCDB for TCs (28), and searched against CollectTF (29), DBTBS (30) and RegulonDB (31) for TFs, by using DIAMOND (32) with an E-value cutoff < 1e–10.
Figure 3.

CAZyme gene cluster (CGC) definition and example. (A) Definition of CGC: One CGC must contain at least one CAZyme (red). Two other signature gene classes could also be present: TF (green) and TC (blue) genes. A small number of non-signature genes (gray) can be inserted between two neighboring signature genes. (B) An example CGC from Paludibacter propionicigenes WB4, which has 42 genes in one cluster including 35 CAZymes (red), 1 TC (blue), 2 TFs (green) and 4 other genes (gray). The CAZyme gene labels are based on CAZyme domain assignment. The TC gene labels are based on the best hit in TC-DB. The TF gene labels are based on the best hit in a few TF databases (see main text).

CAZyme gene cluster (CGC) definition and example. (A) Definition of CGC: One CGC must contain at least one CAZyme (red). Two other signature gene classes could also be present: TF (green) and TC (blue) genes. A small number of non-signature genes (gray) can be inserted between two neighboring signature genes. (B) An example CGC from Paludibacter propionicigenes WB4, which has 42 genes in one cluster including 35 CAZymes (red), 1 TC (blue), 2 TFs (green) and 4 other genes (gray). The CAZyme gene labels are based on CAZyme domain assignment. The TC gene labels are based on the best hit in TC-DB. The TF gene labels are based on the best hit in a few TF databases (see main text). We then developed a python program called CGC-Finder to scan the 5,329 bacterial genomes for CGCs. The inputs to this program include a signature gene annotation file and a gene location file. Two important parameters are needed: (i) the distance threshold (range between 0 and 10) to allow a certain number of non-signature genes inserted between two adjacent signature genes; (ii) the signature gene classes (CAZyme+TF+TC, CAZyme+TC, or CAZyme+TF) that must be present in the CGC. These parameters allow the users to define a CGC more loosely or more stringently at their will: e.g. all three signature gene classes have to be present and a minimum number of non-signature genes are allowed in the CGC. Using a stringent parameter setting (distance < 2 and CAZyme+TF+TC), we found in total 26,397 CGCs in 4,077 genomes (Supplementary Table S5). The largest CGC is Paludibacter propionicigenes WB4’s NC_014734.1-CGC2 (Bacteroidetes phylum) containing in total 42 genes (Figure 3B). Among the 4,077 genomes (Supplementary Table S6), Streptomyces bingchenggensis BCW-1 (Actinobacteria phylum) has the largest number (34) of CGCs, the largest number (234) of signature genes, and the largest number (291) of total genes in the CGCs. At the same time, it also has one of the largest genomes (11.8Mb). On the other hand, Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (Bacteroidetes phylum) with a genome size at 7.1 Mb has the largest number (92) of CAZyme genes located in the CGCs, and the highest percentage (11.7%) of CAZymes overall. To remove the effect of genome size, we further calculated the percentage of genes located in CGCs (the number of genes in CGCs divided by the total number of genes in the genome), and the percentage of CAZymes located in CGCs (the number of CAZymes in CGCs divided by the total number of CAZymes in the genome) (Supplementary Table S6). We found that Bifidobacterium scardovii JCM 12489 (Actinobacteria phylum) has the highest percentage of CAZymes (35.1%) located in CGCs and the highest percentage of total genes (8.9%) located in CGCs, suggesting CAZymes of this genome have a strong tendency to be clustered into CGCs. It should be emphasized that our CGCs are defined differently than the classic PULs in the literature. CGC is a broader term than PUL, and is created to study which CAZymes are physically clustered with which other CAZymes, TFs and TCs. Most published PULs were defined in some individual genomes or in some particular group of bacteria (e.g. Bacteroidetes), with a strong bias in favor of SusC/D (TCs) and without requirement of TFs, also often followed by experimental verification. Therefore, it is not meaningful to compare published PULs with CGCs identified here in a much larger scale.

Species metadata collection

We have extracted the species sample information of the 5,349 genomes using the JGI IMG database's metadata table (33) by matching the NCBI BioSample IDs. We showed in Supplementary Table S7 that: (i) 459 genomes have Disease information; (ii) 1,245 have Ecosystem info; (iii) 1,165 have Ecosystem Category info; (iv) 1,124 have Ecosystem Subtype info; (v) 1,143 have Ecosystem Type info; (vi) 1,200 have Habitat info; (vii) 321 have Metabolism info; (viii) 1,089 have Motility info; (ix) 1,138 have Oxygen Requirement info; (x) 684 have Phenotype info; (xi) 242 have Sample Body Site info; (xii) 1,111 have Specific Ecosystem info; (xiii) 1,188 have Temperature Range info. All these metadata was incorporated into the dbCAN-seq database and used to classify the genomes into different metadata groups.

WEB DESIGN

The dbCAN-seq website is powered by MySQL+PHP+JavaScript+Sphinx. The following features are unique to dbCAN-seq and not available at other CAZyme websites:

Download page

The download page has a searchable table with all the 5,329 genomes. Each row of the table corresponds to a genome with a download link to a compressed tarball file. The tarball contains a FASTA sequence file of all the CAZymes in the genome, and a tab-separated file with all the annotation and location data. There is also a link to download data of all the genomes.

CGC page

The CGC page is designed as a tool page. When a user opens the ‘CAZyme Gene Cluster’ page, a table will be seen with all the 5,329 genomes. The table actually has 7,841 rows as one genome can have multiple RefSeq IDs (chromosomes and plasmids). One can click on the genome to open a new page, where two parameters need to be set: (i) distance and (ii) signature gene classes, which were already described above. After hitting on the ‘Calculate’ button, the CGC-Finder python program will be called to identify CGCs in the genome. The program runs very fast: processing one genome takes a few milliseconds, and processing all the 5,329 genomes together takes < 1 min. The CGC-Finder result will be printed as a table below the parameter selection section. Each row in the table is one CGC with different statistics about the CGC, such as the numbers of the three signature genes and the number of all genes (including non-signature ones). Clicking on the CGC_no will open a separate page showing: (i) the graphical representation of the genomic location of the CGC in a Jbrowser; (ii) at the bottom the detailed information about all genes in the CGC as a table, such as the genomic location, the functional description, and if signature gene and evidence. All the data tables can be downloaded by clicking on a download link above the table.

Metadata page

The metadata page has a pull-down menu, where users can select one from 16 different metadata types. Under the pull-down menu, a bar graph is shown with each bar representing one group of the selected metadata type. For example, one particular disease Tuberculosis is associated with 16 genomes, and the height of the bar is 16. Clicking on the bar will open a new page with another bar graph, now each bar representing one genome and the height representing the number of CAZymes in that genome. This design allows users to quickly browse a variety of metadata types, the genomes associated with one particular group of metadata, and the CAZymes in the genome.

Protein annotation page

The protein annotation page collects all kinds of annotation about a CAZyme and presents them in 13 sections: basic information, genomic context (graphical JBrowser window), full-length sequence (protein and nucleotide CDS sequence), enzyme annotation, CAZyme signature domains, CDD domains, CAZy hits, PDB hits, Swiss-Prot hits, signal peptide prediction, transmembrane prediction, protein secondary structure prediction, and lipoprotein prediction. All the 572 269 CAZymes have a protein page, which is dynamically generated by a PHP script querying different MySQL tables. From this page, users can quickly browse/obtain the most comprehensive pre-computed CAZyme sequence and annotation data.

Search function

A search box is shown at the top part of all pages. The search function is built upon the powerful search engine Sphinx, which has been programmatically configured to allow very fast index-organized table search (average response time: 300 ms) and highly efficient pagination. It implements a Google-like search supporting both exact and fuzzy query, and users can input a keyword to search 12 different data types. These data types can be largely classified into three groups: (i) basic information about CAZymes: such as species name, CAZyme domain, protein ID, GCF ID, taxonomy ID; (ii) CAZyme annotation data: such as PDB hits, Swiss-Prot hits, CAZy hits, CDD hits, E2P2 predicted enzyme reaction and EC number; (iii) CAZyme genomic context. For data types in (ii), it is to search for CAZymes sharing sequence similarity to Swiss-Prot, PDB, and CAZy proteins. For example, one can type in a PDB ID (e.g. 1LZL_A) and choose a sequence identity value (e.g, 50%). The search will return a list of CAZymes sharing similarity with the queried PDB protein with identity larger than the given value: http://cys.bios.niu.edu/dbCAN_seq/search.php?sim=50&signum=5&search_type=6&search_txt=1LZL_A. This is very useful to answer questions like, what proteins in dbCAN-seq have a high sequence similarity to some experimentally characterized CAZymes? As for (iii), it is a very useful tool to search the gene neighborhood of a query CAZyme. For example, users can type in a CAZyme protein ID (e.g. WP_007212487.1), and select how many upstream and downstream genes of the query gene they want to explore (e.g. 5). The search will return a table with 11 genes with the query gene being the sixth in the table: http://cys.bios.niu.edu/dbCAN_seq/search.php?sim=20&signum=5&search_type=12&search_txt=WP_007212487.1. If any of the 11 genes are CGC signature genes (i.e. CAZyme, TF or TC), they will be highlighted with colors. This is a novel tool to answer questions like, is my CAZyme located close to any other CAZyme genes or TF or TC genes, or is my CAZyme potentially located in any CGCs?

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to other CAZyme web resources, dbCAN-seq has the following unique features: It provides a convenient download page for users to batch download all the pre-computed CAZyme sequence and annotation data for 5,329 fully sequenced bacterial genomes; It provides the most comprehensive annotation data for computationally identified CAZymes; It provides a metadata page to organize the bacterial genomes according to 16 different metadata such as disease, ecosystem, habitat, oxygen requirement, temperature, metabolism, etc. It offers a very fast program CGC-Finder to identify CAZyme gene clusters (CGCs). The identified CGCs are presented in a CGC page.

FUTURE WORK

In the next release of dbCAN-seq, we will also include 700+ fungal genomes and 5,000+ metagenomes. We plan to update the database once a year to include newly defined CAZyme families, newly sequenced genomes and add new functions/features. It is our hope that dbCAN-seq will become a primary website, where users from various research fields (genomics, carbohydrate, bioenergy, plant disease, food security, human microbiome and ecology) can quickly and easily download and browse the most comprehensive microbial CAZyme sequence and annotation data. Its function will be complementary to our dbCAN web server, which focuses on providing CAZyme online prediction service, and the CAZy database, which focuses on CAZyme family classification and nomenclature. Click here for additional data file.
  33 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Polysaccharide Degradation by the Intestinal Microbiota and Its Influence on Human Health and Disease.

Authors:  Darrell W Cockburn; Nicole M Koropatkin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Three genomes from the phylum Acidobacteria provide insight into the lifestyles of these microorganisms in soils.

Authors:  Naomi L Ward; Jean F Challacombe; Peter H Janssen; Bernard Henrissat; Pedro M Coutinho; Martin Wu; Gary Xie; Daniel H Haft; Michelle Sait; Jonathan Badger; Ravi D Barabote; Brent Bradley; Thomas S Brettin; Lauren M Brinkac; David Bruce; Todd Creasy; Sean C Daugherty; Tanja M Davidsen; Robert T DeBoy; J Chris Detter; Robert J Dodson; A Scott Durkin; Anuradha Ganapathy; Michelle Gwinn-Giglio; Cliff S Han; Hoda Khouri; Hajnalka Kiss; Sagar P Kothari; Ramana Madupu; Karen E Nelson; William C Nelson; Ian Paulsen; Kevin Penn; Qinghu Ren; M J Rosovitz; Jeremy D Selengut; Susmita Shrivastava; Steven A Sullivan; Roxanne Tapia; L Sue Thompson; Kisha L Watkins; Qi Yang; Chunhui Yu; Nikhat Zafar; Liwei Zhou; Cheryl R Kuske
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Microbial biochemistry, physiology, and biotechnology of hyperthermophilic Thermotoga species.

Authors:  Shannon B Conners; Emmanuel F Mongodin; Matthew R Johnson; Clemente I Montero; Karen E Nelson; Robert M Kelly
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 16.408

6.  How do gut microbes break down dietary fiber?

Authors:  Nicolas Terrapon; Bernard Henrissat
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 13.807

7.  dbCAN: a web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation.

Authors:  Yanbin Yin; Xizeng Mao; Jincai Yang; Xin Chen; Fenglou Mao; Ying Xu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  CollecTF: a database of experimentally validated transcription factor-binding sites in Bacteria.

Authors:  Sefa Kiliç; Elliot R White; Dinara M Sagitova; Joseph P Cornish; Ivan Erill
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  RegulonDB version 9.0: high-level integration of gene regulation, coexpression, motif clustering and beyond.

Authors:  Socorro Gama-Castro; Heladia Salgado; Alberto Santos-Zavaleta; Daniela Ledezma-Tejeida; Luis Muñiz-Rascado; Jair Santiago García-Sotelo; Kevin Alquicira-Hernández; Irma Martínez-Flores; Lucia Pannier; Jaime Abraham Castro-Mondragón; Alejandra Medina-Rivera; Hilda Solano-Lira; César Bonavides-Martínez; Ernesto Pérez-Rueda; Shirley Alquicira-Hernández; Liliana Porrón-Sotelo; Alejandra López-Fuentes; Anastasia Hernández-Koutoucheva; Víctor Del Moral-Chávez; Fabio Rinaldi; Julio Collado-Vides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  63 in total

1.  Complete genome sequencing and comparative CAZyme analysis of Rhodococcus sp. PAMC28705 and PAMC28707 provide insight into their biotechnological and phytopathogenic potential.

Authors:  Nisha Ghimire; So-Ra Han; Byeollee Kim; Sang-Hee Jung; Hyun Park; Jun Hyuck Lee; Tae-Jin Oh
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.552

2.  Division of labor in honey bee gut microbiota for plant polysaccharide digestion.

Authors:  Hao Zheng; Julie Perreau; J Elijah Powell; Benfeng Han; Zijing Zhang; Waldan K Kwong; Susannah G Tringe; Nancy A Moran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  An In Vitro Enrichment Strategy for Formulating Synergistic Synbiotics.

Authors:  Car Reen Kok; David Fabian Gomez Quintero; Clement Niyirora; Devin Rose; Amanda Li; Robert Hutkins
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Community Ecology of Deinococcus in Irradiated Soil.

Authors:  Matthew Chidozie Ogwu; Sathiyaraj Srinivasan; Ke Dong; Dhamodharan Ramasamy; Bruce Waldman; Jonathan M Adams
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Unique pool of carbohydrate-degrading enzymes in novel bacteria assembled from cow and buffalo rumen metagenomes.

Authors:  Varsha Bohra; Hitesh Tikariha; Hemant J Purohit; Nishant A Dafale
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  A unique combination of glycoside hydrolases in Streptococcus suis specifically and sequentially acts on host-derived αGal-epitope glycans.

Authors:  Ping Chen; Ran Liu; Mengmeng Huang; Jinlu Zhu; Dong Wei; Francis J Castellino; Guanghui Dang; Fang Xie; Gang Li; Ziyin Cui; Siguo Liu; Yueling Zhang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Microbial Metabolism Modulates Antibiotic Susceptibility within the Murine Gut Microbiome.

Authors:  Damien J Cabral; Swathi Penumutchu; Elizabeth M Reinhart; Cheng Zhang; Benjamin J Korry; Jenna I Wurster; Rachael Nilson; August Guang; William H Sano; Aislinn D Rowan-Nash; Hu Li; Peter Belenky
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 27.287

8.  Transcriptome-Guided Identification of Carbohydrate Active Enzymes (CAZy) from the Christmas Island Red Crab, Gecarcoidea natalis and a Vote for the Inclusion of Transcriptome-Derived Crustacean CAZys in Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Han Ming Gan; Christopher Austin; Stuart Linton
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  GTDB: an integrated resource for glycosyltransferase sequences and annotations.

Authors:  Chenfen Zhou; Qingwei Xu; Sheng He; Wei Ye; Ruifang Cao; Pengyu Wang; Yunchao Ling; Xing Yan; Qingzhong Wang; Guoqing Zhang
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  Genomic Analysis of Family UBA6911 (Group 18 Acidobacteria) Expands the Metabolic Capacities of the Phylum and Highlights Adaptations to Terrestrial Habitats.

Authors:  Archana Yadav; Jenna C Borrelli; Mostafa S Elshahed; Noha H Youssef
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.