Literature DB >> 30052262

Results and Outcomes After Midshaft Clavicle Fracture: Matched Pair Analysis of Operative Versus Nonoperative Management.

Joshua K Napora, Dominic C Grimberg, Benjamin R Childs, Heather A Vallier.   

Abstract

This study evaluated patients with displaced clavicle fractures treated surgically vs nonoperatively. The authors hypothesized that functional outcomes would be no different. A retrospective comparative study was performed of 138 patients with closed midshaft clavicle fractures. Sixty-nine patients were treated operatively and matched for sex, age, and fracture pattern to 69 patients treated nonoperatively. Charts and radiographs were reviewed, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons survey was administered. A poor outcome was defined as a treatment complication or an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score less than 60. There were 116 men and 22 women with a mean age of 37.7 years and fracture patterns of 15B-1 (n=78), 15B-2 (n=48), and 15B-3 (n=12). Thirty-seven percent were tobacco smokers, with 23 treated operatively and 28 nonoperatively. Ten (14.5%) initially nonoperative patients underwent plate fixation at a mean of 25.9 weeks (range, 7-48 weeks) because of persistent pain and motion at the fracture site. Fifteen (21.7%) of the 69 patients treated acutely with surgery had 16 complications, which resulted in secondary procedures in 11 patients (15.9%). Overall, poor outcomes occurred in 21 (30.4%) of 69 after fixation and in 19 (27.5%) of 69 in the nonoperative group. Unemployment (P=.05) and tobacco use (P=.03) were associated with poor outcome, irrespective of type of treatment. Initial nonoperative treatment presents a reasonable option for many patients. No differences in complications or poor outcomes were noted for surgical vs nonoperative treatment. Social factors proved to be greater predictors of outcome than other patient or injury features. Management of clavicle fractures should be individualized with assessment of patient expectations and activity level. Social factors should also be considered. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e689-e694.]. Copyright 2018, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30052262     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20180724-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  4 in total

1.  Bilateral Clavicle Fractures - A Rare Injury.

Authors:  Kishore Vellingiri; Hariprasad Seenappa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-11-11

2.  Restarting Orthopaedic Care in a Pandemic: Ethical Framework and Case Examples.

Authors:  Casey Jo Humbyrd; Alexandra M Dunham; Amy L Xu; Travis N Rieder
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 3.  An evaluation of treatment options for medial, midshaft, and distal clavicle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Vannabouathong; Justin Chiu; Rahil Patel; Shreyas Sreeraman; Elias Mohamed; Mohit Bhandari; Kenneth Koval; Michael D McKee
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-05-04

4.  Awake Single-Stage Bilateral Clavicle Surgeries Under Bilateral Clavipectoral Fascial Plane Blocks: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Kartik Sonawane; Saisrivas Dharmapuri; Shlok Saxena; Tuhin Mistry; J Balavenkatasubramanian
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.