OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between emergency medicine (EM) resident and attending physician patient satisfaction scores. METHODS: We added four resident questions to the standard Press Ganey survey used at a large, urban, university hospital with a PGY-1 to -4 EM residency. The resident questions were identical to the traditional attending questions. Press Ganey distributed the modified survey to a random sample of 30% of discharged patients. We assessed the correlation between resident and attending top-box Press Ganey scores using Pearson's coefficients. Two-tailed two-sample comparisons of proportions were used to compare top-box responses between residents and attendings. RESULTS: From September 1, 2012, to August 31, 2015, a total of 66,216 patients received surveys, and 7,968 responded, resulting in a 12.03% response rate, similar to Press Ganey survey response rate at comparable peer institutions. Patients were able to discriminate between residents and attendings; however, 751 surveys did not contain responses for residents, resulting in a total number of 6,957. All 64 of the EM residents had a minimum of 5 or more surveys returned. There was a high degree of correlation between resident and attending top-box scores with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.75 to 0.80. However, the proportion of top-box scores was consistently higher for residents (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high degree of correlation between resident and attending top-box scores on Press Ganey surveys, with residents scoring slightly higher than attendings. The addition of resident questions to the standard Press Ganey survey does not appear to decrease overall attending scores.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between emergency medicine (EM) resident and attending physician patient satisfaction scores. METHODS: We added four resident questions to the standard Press Ganey survey used at a large, urban, university hospital with a PGY-1 to -4 EM residency. The resident questions were identical to the traditional attending questions. Press Ganey distributed the modified survey to a random sample of 30% of discharged patients. We assessed the correlation between resident and attending top-box Press Ganey scores using Pearson's coefficients. Two-tailed two-sample comparisons of proportions were used to compare top-box responses between residents and attendings. RESULTS: From September 1, 2012, to August 31, 2015, a total of 66,216 patients received surveys, and 7,968 responded, resulting in a 12.03% response rate, similar to Press Ganey survey response rate at comparable peer institutions. Patients were able to discriminate between residents and attendings; however, 751 surveys did not contain responses for residents, resulting in a total number of 6,957. All 64 of the EM residents had a minimum of 5 or more surveys returned. There was a high degree of correlation between resident and attending top-box scores with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.75 to 0.80. However, the proportion of top-box scores was consistently higher for residents (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high degree of correlation between resident and attending top-box scores on Press Ganey surveys, with residents scoring slightly higher than attendings. The addition of resident questions to the standard Press Ganey survey does not appear to decrease overall attending scores.
Authors: Assaad Sayah; Melisa Lai-Becker; Lisa Kingsley-Rocker; Tasha Scott-Long; Kelly O'Connor; Luis F Lobon Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Heather Farley; Enrique R Enguidanos; Christian M Coletti; Leah Honigman; Anthony Mazzeo; Thomas B Pinson; Kevin Reed; Jennifer L Wiler Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Spenser C Lang; Paul L Weygandt; Tiffani Darling; Stephanie Gravenor; Juliet J Evans; Michael J Schmidt; Michael A Gisondi Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2017-06-22
Authors: Katie L Lappé; Sonja E Raaum; Claire E Ciarkowski; Santosh P Reddy; Stacy A Johnson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Michael S Pulia; Steven Hesse; Rebecca J Schwei; Lucas T Schulz; Ajay Sethi; Azita Hamedani Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2020-06-06 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: David H Salzman; Kristin L Rising; Kenzie A Cameron; Rhea E Powell; Dimitri Papanagnou; Amanda Doty; Katherine Piserchia; Lori Latimer; William C McGaghie; Danielle M McCarthy Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2020-02
Authors: Spenser C Lang; Paul L Weygandt; Tiffani Darling; Stephanie Gravenor; Juliet J Evans; Michael J Schmidt; Michael A Gisondi Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2017-06-22
Authors: Moon O Lee; Jonathan Altamirano; Luis C Garcia; Michael A Gisondi; N Ewen Wang; Suzanne Lippert; Yvonne Maldonado; Laleh Gharahbaghian; Ryan Ribeira; Magali Fassiotto Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2020-10-19
Authors: Corlin M Jewell; Aaron S Kraut; Danielle T Miller; Kaitlin A Ray; Elizabeth Barrall Werley; Bejamin H Schnapp Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2022-01-01