Adam Kern1, Victor Hong2, Joyce Song2, Sarah Ketchen Lipson3, Daniel Eisenberg4. 1. Washington University in St. Louis, School of Social Work, St. Louis, MO, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Department of Health Law Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Health Management and Policy, and Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ubiquity of smartphones and the development of mental health apps (MHAs) calls for evaluation of consumers' attitudes towards and usage of MHAs. Due to the increasing demand for mental health services on college campuses, research is especially needed to evaluate MHAs as a potentially viable treatment modality in that setting. METHODS: The study team developed survey questions related to MHAs, added these to the Healthy Minds Study, and used Qualtrics as the platform. The participants were 741 students, age 18 and older, from a large Midwest public university. Students could answer a varying number of multiple choice questions based on embedded display logic, and the survey required 20-25 minutes for most participants to complete. Based on embedded display logic in the survey and how questions were answered, students could receive anywhere from 1-20 questions. Questions were primarily categorical (e.g., "Yes", "Maybe", "No"), with the remaining questions in free response format. The survey was fielded in April, 2016. RESULTS: 26.1% of respondents were open to using an MHA yet only 7.3% had used an MHA. 9.0% of respondents preferred to use an MHA versus seeing a mental health professional. 13.2% of respondents felt that MHAs do have an evidence base. 23.8% of users felt that MHAs helped with their mental health. Those who reported receiving mental health services within the past 12 months were significantly more open to using MHAs than those who had not received services. Convenience, immediate availability, and confidentiality were common reasons for interest in MHAs. CONCLUSIONS: There is interest in, but limited usage, of MHAs among university students, providing evidence of MHAs as a potentially untapped treatment modality for this population. Further research could help assess how best to integrate this technology into the university and college mental health system.
BACKGROUND: The ubiquity of smartphones and the development of mental health apps (MHAs) calls for evaluation of consumers' attitudes towards and usage of MHAs. Due to the increasing demand for mental health services on college campuses, research is especially needed to evaluate MHAs as a potentially viable treatment modality in that setting. METHODS: The study team developed survey questions related to MHAs, added these to the Healthy Minds Study, and used Qualtrics as the platform. The participants were 741 students, age 18 and older, from a large Midwest public university. Students could answer a varying number of multiple choice questions based on embedded display logic, and the survey required 20-25 minutes for most participants to complete. Based on embedded display logic in the survey and how questions were answered, students could receive anywhere from 1-20 questions. Questions were primarily categorical (e.g., "Yes", "Maybe", "No"), with the remaining questions in free response format. The survey was fielded in April, 2016. RESULTS: 26.1% of respondents were open to using an MHA yet only 7.3% had used an MHA. 9.0% of respondents preferred to use an MHA versus seeing a mental health professional. 13.2% of respondents felt that MHAs do have an evidence base. 23.8% of users felt that MHAs helped with their mental health. Those who reported receiving mental health services within the past 12 months were significantly more open to using MHAs than those who had not received services. Convenience, immediate availability, and confidentiality were common reasons for interest in MHAs. CONCLUSIONS: There is interest in, but limited usage, of MHAs among university students, providing evidence of MHAs as a potentially untapped treatment modality for this population. Further research could help assess how best to integrate this technology into the university and college mental health system.
Entities:
Keywords:
College students; mental health; mobile apps; technology; treatment
Authors: Steven Chan; Haley Godwin; Alvaro Gonzalez; Peter M Yellowlees; Donald M Hilty Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Anna Huguet; Sanjay Rao; Patrick J McGrath; Lori Wozney; Mike Wheaton; Jill Conrod; Sharlene Rozario Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nasser F BinDhim; Eman M Alanazi; Hisham Aljadhey; Mada H Basyouni; Stefan R Kowalski; Lisa G Pont; Ahmed M Shaman; Lyndal Trevena; Tariq M Alhawassi Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: John Torous; Steven Richard Chan; Shih Yee-Marie Tan; Jacob Behrens; Ian Mathew; Erich J Conrad; Ladson Hinton; Peter Yellowlees; Matcheri Keshavan Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2014-12-23
Authors: Rogério Augusto Bordini; Johann-Christoph Münscher; Kim Annabell Baumgartner; Sara Hagos; Jennifer Hornig; Stefano Gampe; Berkay Yaman; Oliver Korn; Philipp Yorck Herzberg Journal: J Technol Behav Sci Date: 2020-10-08
Authors: Emily G Lattie; Katherine A Cohen; Emily Hersch; Kofoworola D A Williams; Kaylee Payne Kruzan; Carolyn MacIver; Joseph Hermes; Karen Maddi; Mary Kwasny; David C Mohr Journal: Internet Interv Date: 2021-12-24
Authors: Judith Borghouts; Elizabeth V Eikey; Gloria Mark; Cinthia De Leon; Stephen M Schueller; Margaret Schneider; Nicole Stadnick; Kai Zheng; Dana B Mukamel; Dara H Sorkin Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Tamar Kodish; Anna S Lau; Elizabeth Gong-Guy; Eliza Congdon; Inna Arnaudova; Madison Schmidt; Lauren Shoemaker; Michelle G Craske Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2021-09-09