| Literature DB >> 30050013 |
Federica Valentini1,2, Andrea Calcaterra3, Simonetta Antonaroli4, Maurizio Talamo5.
Abstract
This article reviews recent portable sensor technologies to apply in the Cultural Heritage (CH) fields. The review has been prepared in the form of a retrospective description of the sensor's history and technological evolution, having: new nanomaterials for transducers, miniaturized, portable and integrated sensors, the wireless transmission of the analytical signals, ICT_Information Communication Technology and IoT_Internet of Things to apply to the cultural heritage field. In addition, a new trend of movable tattoo sensors devices is discussed, referred to in situ analysis, which is especially important when scientists are in the presence of un-movable and un-tangible Cultural Heritage and Art Work objects. The new proposed portable contact sensors (directly applied to art work objects and surfaces) are non-invasive and non-destructive to the different materials and surfaces of which cultural heritage is composed.Entities:
Keywords: Cultural Heritage (CH); ICT; IoT; Sensors; actuators; air quality control; analytical diagnosis; graphene; graphene oxide (GO); in situ restoration; integrated sensor arrays; mobile Laboratory; movable devices; nanomaterials
Year: 2018 PMID: 30050013 PMCID: PMC6111338 DOI: 10.3390/s18082434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Summary of the main challenges, research needs, limitation and drawbacks of the CH sensors.
| Sensor Description | Challenges | Limitations and Drawbacks | Research Needs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional unmovable technologies, located in research laboratories | To assemble portable technologies for in situ monitoring especially for un-movable and un-tangible CHs | Portable miniaturized sensors present the lowest sensitivity and the highest detection of limit if compared with those exhibited by the conventional tools, located in academic research laboratories | To improve the sensitivity of the miniaturized movable tools, by developing smart and highly efficient nanomaterials, applied for the sensor transducers modification |
| New generation of tattoo sensors | To contact mode measuring, directly applied on CH’s surfaces and walls | Lowest sensitivity and un-compatible materials, applied for the tattoo tools fabrication, toward the chemical composition of the Art Work objects | To develop highly sensitive nanostructured materials, suitable for the transducers modification/assembly, extremely compatible with the Art Work support. |
Figure 1(a): Prototype of the improved RH optical sensor equipped with a protective stainless steel tube [48]; (b): schematic view of the Hument HPR type humidity sensor device [57].
Figure 2(a): Exploded scheme of Analyst NO2 and Analyst NOx passive samplers [62]; (b): Structure of the ‘Analyst’ sampler, improved by Bertoni et al. [66] for BTX; (c): Exploded scheme of the multi-pollutant sampler, according to the literature [67].
Figure 3Layer-by-layer fabrication of the potentiometric tattoo sensor, as reported by Guinovart et al. [76]. The authors, display a cartoon to explain a future applications of tattoo sensors for the “in situ” detection of adsorbed pollutants and damages, on the CH surfaces.
Scheme 1This cartoon (assembled by the authors of the review) represents the main future idea of the tattoo, as innovative actuator for in situ restoration of CHs, based on functionalized graphene nanomaterial, which act as reserve of restoration/consolidation chemical agents, suitable to release the selective Reagents in controlled way, on damaged Art Work surfaces. The damaged paper and parchment samples could provide the right clock for the modulated releasing of restoration agents, depending on the ΔpH, Δμ and other modification of chemical-physical parameters, induced by inner and/or outer deterioration events.
Comparison in terms of the sensitivity for the most performing sensors.
| Portable/Movable Sensors | Sensitive Nano Material Layers | Sensitivity Parameter | References |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Reduced Graphene Oxide | 0.22 dB/% RH | [ |
| abry-Perot resonator | |||
|
| Graphene Oxide (GO) | up to 37,800% | [ |
|
| Acrylic acid/isooctylacrylate and 2826 MB ((Fe40Ni38Mo4B18) surface | 0.6%/pH | [ |
|
| Carbon paper filter, coated by 3.0 mM Na2CO3/0.3 mM NaHCO3, aqueous solution | 5 μg/m3 (NO2) | [ |
| NO2 | |||
| SO2 | 10 μg/m3 (SO2) | ||
|
| Filter-pack systems | 2 g/m3 | [ |
| Micro-fabricated mass-sensitive Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator (FBAR) |
Summary of the most important monitoring field campaigns, organized in several famous national and international museums, libraries and galleries, discussed in the review.
| Sensor Category Description | Indoor Environment, Selected for the Monitoring Field Campaigns | References |
|---|---|---|
| Crossbow mica2 motes, equipped with an MTS400CA data acquisition board and a mib520board (as the base station) | Museum called Fortaleza São Tiago, located in Madeira Island, (Portugal) | [ |
| MEMS based technology has been applied, where: the temperature transducer is based on a semiconductor diode element; the humidity probe is based on a capacitive element | The Cloisters, the medieval branch of the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art (USA) | [ |
| Analyst® (Marbaglass, Rome, Italy), patented by CNR gas sensing devices | Uffizi museum and gallery, Florence (Italy) | [ |
| Novel multi-pollutant diffusive sampler | Different libraries/archives, located in Switzerland in Bern, Geneva, in Czech Republic and also in Prague | [ |
| Dust Scan Scout Aerosol Monitor, that is a continuous dust analyzer | Museum of Capodimonte in Naples (Italy) | [ |
| 24-h size-segregated PM cascade impactor (Sioutas PCIS, SKC Inc., Eighty Four, PA, USA) | Refectory in the city center of Milan (Italy), where the “Last Supper” painting, one of Leonardo da Vinci’s most famous artworks, is preserved | [ |
Figure 4Block diagram for “Local Node Gateway”.
Figure 5The single smart space S3 model.