Hanna Aludden1, Arne Mordenfeld2, Mats Hallman3, Ann-Eva Christensen4, Thomas Starch-Jensen5. 1. Resident, PhD Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 2. Consultant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle, Sweden Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Gävleborg County Council, Gävleborg, Sweden. 3. Consultant, Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle, Sweden. 4. Biostatistician, Unit of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 5. Professor, Consultant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis of no difference in the long-term treatment outcome after osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation with or without a grafting material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE search in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals was conducted, including human studies published in English from January 1, 1986 to December 1, 2017. RESULTS: One comparative and 7 noncomparative studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Survival of suprastructures had never been compared within the same study. Meta-analysis demonstrated an overall estimated patient-based implant survival of 94%. Gain in vertical alveolar bone height was similar with the 2 treatment modalities. Noncomparative studies demonstrated high long-term survival rate of suprastructures and implants with the 2 treatment modalities, as well as limited periimplant marginal bone loss. CONCLUSION: High long-term implant survival was demonstrated after osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation with or without a grafting material. However, long-term randomized controlled trials comparing the 2 treatment modalities are sparse. Hence, conclusions drawn from this systematic review should be interpreted with caution.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis of no difference in the long-term treatment outcome after osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation with or without a grafting material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE search in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals was conducted, including human studies published in English from January 1, 1986 to December 1, 2017. RESULTS: One comparative and 7 noncomparative studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Survival of suprastructures had never been compared within the same study. Meta-analysis demonstrated an overall estimated patient-based implant survival of 94%. Gain in vertical alveolar bone height was similar with the 2 treatment modalities. Noncomparative studies demonstrated high long-term survival rate of suprastructures and implants with the 2 treatment modalities, as well as limited periimplant marginal bone loss. CONCLUSION: High long-term implant survival was demonstrated after osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation with or without a grafting material. However, long-term randomized controlled trials comparing the 2 treatment modalities are sparse. Hence, conclusions drawn from this systematic review should be interpreted with caution.
Authors: Roberto Farina; Anna Simonelli; Giovanni Franceschetti; Luigi Minenna; Gian Pietro Schincaglia; Orio Riccardi; Leonardo Trombelli Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 3.606
Authors: Adrián Maximiano Millán; Rocío Bravo Álvarez; Miguel Plana Montori; María Guerrero González; David Saura García-Martín; Blanca Ríos-Carrasco; Francesca Monticelli; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Ana Fernández-Palacín Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-14 Impact factor: 3.390