Mingfu Ye1, Wenjun Liu2, Shaolong Cheng2, Lihui Yan2. 1. Department of Oral Implantology, Stomatological Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Stomatological Disease Diagnosis and Treatment, 1309, Lvling Road, Xiamen, 361008, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China. Dentist_yipmyonphu@163.com. 2. Department of Oral Implantology, Stomatological Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Stomatological Disease Diagnosis and Treatment, 1309, Lvling Road, Xiamen, 361008, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the implant survival/success rate, gain in alveolar bone height, crestal bone loss, and complications associated with implants placed in the posterior maxilla after osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone substitutes. METHODS: The electronic databases, such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and SCOPUS were systematically and manually searched for publications in peer-reviewed journals. The included articles were subjected to qualitative and quantitative analyses, and the meta-analysis was carried out for single-arm studies. Methodological quality assessment was made for all the included studies. RESULTS: The included studies were of moderate quality, with the overall implant success and survival rates of 98.3% and 97.9% respectively. The most frequent intra-surgical complication was sinus membrane perforation, accounting for 3.08% of the total implants with reported perforations. The overall crestal bone loss in patients with immediate implants placed with OSFE after a 5-year follow-up was 0.957 mm 95%CI (0.538, 1.377). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this review, it can be concluded that the survival and success rates of implants placed immediately along with OSFE without any bone substitutes are acceptable and show adequate implant stability with less crestal bone loss over 5 years.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the implant survival/success rate, gain in alveolar bone height, crestal bone loss, and complications associated with implants placed in the posterior maxilla after osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone substitutes. METHODS: The electronic databases, such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and SCOPUS were systematically and manually searched for publications in peer-reviewed journals. The included articles were subjected to qualitative and quantitative analyses, and the meta-analysis was carried out for single-arm studies. Methodological quality assessment was made for all the included studies. RESULTS: The included studies were of moderate quality, with the overall implant success and survival rates of 98.3% and 97.9% respectively. The most frequent intra-surgical complication was sinus membrane perforation, accounting for 3.08% of the total implants with reported perforations. The overall crestal bone loss in patients with immediate implants placed with OSFE after a 5-year follow-up was 0.957 mm 95%CI (0.538, 1.377). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this review, it can be concluded that the survival and success rates of implants placed immediately along with OSFE without any bone substitutes are acceptable and show adequate implant stability with less crestal bone loss over 5 years.
Authors: Milan Jurisic; Aleksa Markovic; Milan Radulovic; Bozidar M B Brkovic; George K B Sándor Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 2008-07-07
Authors: Patrick R Schmidlin; Jakob Müller; Andreas Bindl; Homas Imfeld Journal: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Jonathan Rees; Dimitrios Karasoulos; Pietro Felice; Rami Alissa; Helen Worthington; Paul Coulthard Journal: Eur J Oral Implantol Date: 2010 Impact factor: 3.123
Authors: Ole Oelerich; Johannes Kleinheinz; Lauren Bohner; Vera Wiesmüller; Marcel Hanisch Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 3.390