| Literature DB >> 30047256 |
Reina Engle-Stone1, Martin Nankap2, Alex O Ndjebayi2, Avital Friedman3, Ann Tarini2, Kenneth H Brown1,4, Lucia Kaiser1.
Abstract
Information on the distribution and predictors of obesity in Africa is needed to identify populations at risk and explore intervention options. Our objectives were to (a) examine the prevalence and geographic distribution of overweight and obesity among Cameroonian women; (b) evaluate change in anthropometric indicators among urban women between 2009 and 2012; (c) examine associations between household and individual characteristics and overweight and obesity; and (d) examine relationships between body mass index (BMI), abdominal obesity, and inflammation. We analysed data from a nationally representative survey conducted in 3 geographic strata (North, South, and Yaoundé/Douala) in Cameroon in 2009 and a survey in Yaoundé/Douala in 2012. Participants selected for this analysis were nonpregnant women, ages 15-49 years (n = 704 in 2009; n = 243 in 2012). In 2009, ~8% of women were underweight (BMI < 18.5) and 32% overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 25.0). Underweight was most common in the North (19%) and overweight and obesity in the South (40%) and Yaoundé/Douala (49%). Prevalence of BMI ≥ 25.0 in Yaoundé/Douala did not differ in 2012 compared with 2009 (55.5% vs. 48.7%; P = 0.16). Residence in urban areas, greater maternal age, and TV ownership were independently related to overweight and obesity in national and stratified analyses. In Yaoundé/Douala in 2012, 48% (waist-to-hip ratio > 0.85) to 73% (waist circumference > 80 cm) had abdominal obesity. Body mass index was positively associated with abdominal obesity and inflammation. Though causal inferences cannot be drawn, these findings indicate population subgroups at greatest risk for overweight and associated health consequences in Cameroon.Entities:
Keywords: Africa; abdominal obesity; maternal obesity; nutrition transition; overweight
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30047256 PMCID: PMC6174999 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12648
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Matern Child Nutr ISSN: 1740-8695 Impact factor: 3.092
Characteristics of nonpregnant women of reproductive age and their households in a national survey in 2009 (nationally and by geographic stratum) and in a regional survey in Yaoundé/Douala in 2012
| National (2009) | South (2009) | North (2009) | Yaoundé/Douala (2009) | Yaoundé/Douala (2012) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 704 | 268 | 236 | 200 | 243 | |
| Caregiver age, year | 27.1 [26.5, 27.8] | 27.9 [26.7, 29.1]a | 25.9 [24.8, 27.0]b | 27.3 [26.3, 28.2]a | 29.5 [28.5, 30.5] | |
| Caregiver lactating, % | 29.4 [25.9, 33.0] | 35.8 [29.8, 41.8]a | 27.0 [20.7, 33.3]b | 19.5 [13.5, 25.4]b | 31.9 [26.6, 37.1] | |
| Weight, kg | 61.3 [60.0, 62.7] | 63.0 [60.8, 65.2]b | 55.1 [52.6, 57.5]c | 67.2 [65.0, 69.4]a | 70.1 [67.2, 73.0] | |
| Height, m | 1.60 [1.60, 1.61] | 1.60 [1.59, 1.61] | 1.61 [1.60, 1.62] | 1.61 [1.60, 1.62] | 1.61 [1.61, 1.62] | |
| Short stature (height < 1.45 m, %) | 0.4 [0, 0.9] | 0.5 [0, 1.5] | 0.3 [0, 1.0] | 0.4 [0, 1.1] | 0 | |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.8 [23.4, 24.2] | 24.6 [23.9, 25.3]b | 21.1 [20.4, 21.9]c | 26.0 [25.2, 26.8]a | 26.9 [25.8, 28.0] | |
| BMI < 18.5, % | 7.8 [5.3, 10.2] | 2.1 [0.2, 3.9]b | 19.3 [12.1, 26.5]a | 2.5 [0.2, 4.8]b | 4.7 [1.6, 7.7] | |
| Overweight or obese | 32.4 [28.1, 36.7] | 40.2 [32.7, 47.8]a | 10.6 [5.1, 16.1]b | 48.7 [39.4, 58.0]a | 55.5 [46.9, 64.1] | |
| Obese | 10.7 [8.3, 13.1] | 11.5 [7.3, 15.7]b | 3.4 [0.1, 6.7]c | 20.1 [14.7, 25.5]a | 24.1 [16.6, 31.6] |
Note. Values represent mean or percent (95% CI). Values with different letter superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05) among the three strata in the 2009 survey using survey linear or logistic regression procedures, as appropriate, a > b > c. Controlling for age did not affect the regional differences in BMI. BMI = body mass index.
Significantly different from the 2009 value for Yaoundé/Douala, P < 0.05.
Overweight or obese was defined as BMI ≥ 25.0 and obese defined as BMI ≥ 30.0 for women ≥18 years of age (and 17 women [<2%] with missing age data). For women 15–18 years of age, adolescent‐specific cut‐offs were used (17), but these did not change the classification of individuals as overweight or obese compared with the adult cut‐offs.
Figure 1Prevalence of overweight and obesity according to potential risk factors among nonpregnant Cameroonian women, nationally and regionally in 2009, and in Yaoundé/Douala in 2012. Overweight or obese was defined as body mass index ≥ 25.0 for women ≥18 years of age (and for 17 women [<2%] with missing age data). Categories with n < 10 individuals were excluded from the figure (South: higher education; Fulfulde or other language. North: >14 hr/week of TV watching; professional or other occupation; higher education; English or pidgin language; rich or richest SES quintile. Yaoundé/Douala: Higher education; poorest, poor, or average SES quintile; other, pidgin, Fulfulde, or English language). HH = household; Lact = lactating; SSB = sugar‐sweetened beverage; SES = socio‐economic status
Household and individual characteristics of nonpregnant women of reproductive age and their households in the 2009 survey (nationally and by region) and in the 2012 survey in Yaoundé/Douala
| National (2009) | South (2009) | North (2009) | Yaoundé/Douala (2009) | Yaoundé/Douala (2012) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 704 | 268 | 236 | 200 | 243 | |
| Urban | 425 (58.5) | 166 (63.3) | 62 (26.7)c | 197 (96.7)a | 233 (96.7) | |
| Individuals in household | 7.7 [7.3–8.0] | 7.4 [6.9–7.9]b | 8.8 [8.1–9.4]a | 6.4 [5.8–7.0]c | 6.5 [6.1–6.9] | |
| Household SES | ||||||
| Lowest | 144 (20.8) | 28 (11.0) | 116 (47.4) | 0 | 46 (19.7) | |
| Low | 145 (23.5) | 78 (30.1) | 67 (29.2) | 0 | 53 (22.1) | |
| Average | 137 (21.7) | 71 (26.9) | 40 (19.0) | 26 (14.4) | 47 (19.5) | |
| High | 121 (17.0) | 55 (21.2) | 7 (2.7) | 59 (30.7) | 48 (20.1) | |
| Highest | 138 (17.0) | 28 (10.8) | 4 (1.7) | 106 (54.8) | 46 (18.5) | |
| Car in household | 7.6 [5.1–10.2] | 9.4 [4.8–13.9]a | 3.8 [1.3–6.3]b | 9.8 [3.8–15.8]a | 10.4 [6.3–14.6] | |
| TV in household | 46.8 [40.9–52.7] | 46.0 [35.1–56.9]b | 21.8 [11.9–31.7]c | 88.8 [83.0–94.5]a | 92.2 [88.5–95.9] | |
| Language of interview | ||||||
| English | 38 (6.1) | 34 (12.4) | 1 (0.4) | 3 (1.4) | 13 (5.7) | |
| French | 368 (50.9) | 160 (60.7) | 24 (10.2) | 184 (91.9) | 228 (94.3) | |
| Pidgin | 66 (10.7) | 64 (22.9) | 0 | 2 (0.7) | 0 | |
| Fulfulde | 174 (24.4) | 2 (0.8) | 170 (72.8) | 2 (1.5) | 0 | |
| Other or missing | 58 (7.8) | 8 (3.2) | 41 (16.5) | 9 (4.6) | 0 | |
| Educational attainment | ||||||
| None | 187 (27.7) | 11 (4.8) | 170 (74.5) | 6 (3.6) | 11 (4.7) | |
| Primary | 253 (38.4) | 142 (54.1) | 52 (21.2) | 59 (31.2) | 75 (30.3) | |
| Secondary | 229 (32.2) | 102 (39.3) | 11 (4.3) | 116 (61.1) | 135 (56.7) | |
| Higher | 13 (1.7) | 5 (1.8) | 0 (0) | 8 (4.1) | 20 (8.3) | |
| Occupation | ||||||
| Professional/technical/managerial | 44 (6.4) | 25 (9.5) | 2 (0.9) | 17 (8.4) | 35 (14.2) | |
| Farmer | 104 (18.1) | 75 (28.7) | 29 (14.5) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | |
| Small business/trader | 297 (43.0) | 105 (40.0) | 108 (44.6) | 84 (47.1) | 74 (30.9) | |
| Other | 32 (4.5) | 12 (4.7) | 3 (1.0) | 17 (9.5) | 19 (8.2) | |
| Unemployed | 206 (28.1) | 44 (17.1) | 92 (39.0) | 70 (35.0) | 112 (46.2) | |
| Total time watching TV in the past week | ||||||
| 0 hr | 285 (52.7) | 72 (43.6) | 185 (80.7) | 28 (16.3) | — | |
| <4 hr | 88 (16.3) | 36 (20.6) | 18 (7.6) | 34 (25.0) | — | |
| 4–14 hr | 104 (18.2) | 37 (22.1) | 21 (9.0) | 46 (28.8) | — | |
| >14 hr | 81 (12.8) | 21 (13.7) | 7 (2.7) | 53 (29.9) | — | |
| Consumed sweetened beverages in past week | 36.6 [31.7, 41.4] | 45.9 [36.4, 55.3]a | 11.8 [7.1, 16.4]b | 55.7 [46.3, 65.0]a | 52.0 [44.4, 59.6] | |
| Consumed sweets in past week | 31.5 [27.6, 35.4] | 34.4 [27.8, 41.1] | 26.2 [20.0, 32.8] | 33.5 [27.1, 39.8] | 31.6 [24.3, 39.0] | |
| Consumed biscuit in past week | 47.8 [43.5, 52.1] | 43.5 [36.9, 50.0] | 50.9 [42.6, 59.2] | 52.4 [44.2, 60.6] | 41.0 [34.3, 57.6] | |
| Consumed beignet in past week | 72.3 [67.8, 76.8] | 73.6 [66.0, 81.2]a | 77.9 [71.3, 84.5]a | 60.6 [50.7, 70.5]b | 52.1 [45.7, 58.5] | |
Note. SES: socio‐economic status.
Values are n (weighted %). Values with different letter superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05) among the three strata in the 2009 survey using survey logistic regression procedures, a > b > c.
Values are mean or % [95% CI]. Values with different letter superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05) among the three strata in the 2009 survey using survey linear regression procedures, a > b > c.
Socio‐economic status scores were calculated separately for 2009 and 2012 surveys so are not directly comparable.
Patterns of caregiver education and occupation differ by region, Rao–Scott chi‐square statistic, P < 0.001.
Odds ratios [95% CI] for overweight or obesity from multivariable logistic regression analysis of potential risk factors among nonpregnant Cameroonian women, nationally and regionally in 2009, and in Yaoundé/Douala in 2012
| National (2009) | South (2009) | North (2009) | Yaoundé/Douala (2009) | Yaoundé/Douala (2012) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 677 | 250 | 222 | 179 | 243 | |
| Variable | Levels | |||||
| Milieu (referent = urban) | ||||||
| Rural | 0.52 [0.30, 0.92] | — | — | — | — | |
| Stratum (referent = Yaoundé/Douala) | ||||||
| South | 0.82 [0.49, 1.35] | — | — | — | — | |
| North | 0.14 [0.06, 0.33] | — | — | — | — | |
| Age (referent = ≥26 years) | ||||||
| 20–25.9 years | 0.50 [0.34, 0.75] | — | 0.65 [0.26, 1.64] | 0.27 [0.14, 0.51] | 0.43 [0.25, 0.72] | |
| <20 years | 0.27 [0.11, 0.68] | — | <0.01 [<0.01, <0.01] | 0.07 [0.01, 0.33] | 0.38 [0.12, 1.20] | |
| Household TV ownership (referent = household owns TV) | ||||||
| No TV in household | 0.35 [0.24, 0.51] | 0.46 [0.31, 0.69] | — | 0.31 [0.11, 0.92] | — | |
| SES quintile (referent = average) | ||||||
| Low | — | — | 0.30 [0.10, 0.96] | — | — | |
| Lowest | — | — | 0.08 [0.02, 0.34] | — | — | |
Note. Overweight or obese was defined as BMI ≥ 25.0 for women ≥18 years of age (and 17 women [<2%] with missing age data). For women 15–18 years of age, adolescent‐specific cut‐offs were used (17), but these did not change the classification of individuals as overweight or obese compared with the adult cut‐offs. Subgroups with n < 10 individuals were excluded from models. Nonsignificant variables (P > 0.05) were removed using a stepwise backward regression method. In the South (2009), rural location was removed at P = 0.07 (OR for rural location = 0.57, 95% CI [0.31, 1.06]). In the North (2009), household TV ownership was removed at P = 0.07 (OR for no TV in household = 0.41, 95% CI [0.16, 1.06]). In Yaoundé/Douala (2009), biscuit consumption in the past week was removed at P = 0.051 (OR for no biscuits in last week = 2.05, 95% CI [1.00, 4.19]). All other covariates removed at P > 0.1 (covariates not shown: household car ownership, education, lactation status, weekly hours of TV watched, and consumption of sweetened beverages, sweets, or beignets in the past week). SES: socio‐economic status; BMI: body mass index.
Waist circumference, waist:hip ratio, and waist:height ratios among nonpregnant women 15–49 years of age in Yaoundé and Douala, Cameroon (n = 243)
| Mean or % [95% CI] | |
|---|---|
| Waist circumference, cm | 90.0 [87.5, 92.5] |
| Hip circumference | 105.3 [103.2, 107.4] |
| Waist:hip ratio | 0.85 [0.84, 0.86] |
| Waist:height ratio | 0.56 [0.54, 0.58] |
| Waist circumference > 80 cm, % | 73.0 [65.0, 80.9] |
| Waist circumference > 88 cm, % | 46.0 [37.0, 54.6] |
| Waist:hip ratio > 0.85, % | 48.4 [40.4, 56.4] |
| Waist:height ratio > 0.5, % | 71.3 [64.2, 78.4] |