| Literature DB >> 30046312 |
Seongjae Choi1, Jun-Hyung Kim1, Jeongho Ha1, Bo-Ing Jeong2, Yun Chan Jung2, Geun-Shik Lee1, Heung-Myong Woo1, Byung-Jae Kang1.
Abstract
We investigated the effects of intra-articular injections of alginate-microencapsulated adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) during osteoarthritis (OA) development in a rabbit model of anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT). We induced OA in mature New Zealand white rabbits by bilateral ACLT. Stifle joints were categorised into four groups according to intra-articular injection materials. Alginate microbeads and microencapsulated ASCs were prepared using the vibrational nozzle technology. Two weeks after ACLT, the rabbits received three consecutive weekly intra-articular injections of 0.9% NaCl, alginate microbeads, ASCs, or microencapsulated ASCs, into each joint. Nine weeks after ACLT, we euthanised the rabbits and collected bilateral femoral condyles for macroscopic, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses. Macroscopic evaluation using the modified OA Research Society International (OARSI) score and total cartilage damage score showed that cartilage degradation on the femoral condyle was relatively low in the microencapsulated-ASC group. Histological analysis of the lateral femoral condyles indicated that microencapsulated ASCs had significant chondroprotective effects. Immunohistochemically, the expression of MMP-13 after the articular cartilage damage was relatively low in the microencapsulated-ASC-treated stifle joints. During the development of experimental OA, as compared to ASCs alone, intra-articular injection of microencapsulated ASCs significantly decreased the progression and extent of OA.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30046312 PMCID: PMC6038583 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2791632
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cells Int Impact factor: 5.443
Figure 1The scheme of the study on intra-articular injection with a material according to experimental groups and microscopic appearance. (a) The study scheme for intra-articular injection of a material according to an experimental group. (b) A light-microscopy image of ASCs having spindle-shaped morphology. (c) A light-microscopy image of alginate microbeads in the absence of cells. (d) Light-microscopic appearance of microencapsulated ASCs at the time of implantation, with 300–400 cells within each 400–500 μm capsule. Scale bar = 500 μm.
Figure 2Macroscopic analysis of femoral condyles at 9 weeks after ACLT. (a) A representative specimen of a condyle (from each group) stained with India ink to identify any fibrillation and erosion. (b) The macroscopic OA score. (c) The TCDS. ∗A significant difference from the control group (P < 0.05). #A significant difference from the alginate microbead group (P < 0.05). †A significant difference from the ASC group (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Histological analysis of femoral lateral condyles. (a) A representative specimen of a lateral condyle from each group stained with Safranin-O and counterstained with fast green. (b) The OARSI score of OA. ∗A significant difference from the control group (P < 0.05). Scale bar = 200 μm.
Figure 4IHC analysis for MMP-13 in cartilage. (a) A representative specimen from each group evaluated for MMP-13 in a femoral lateral condyle. (b) The proportion of MMP-13-positive cells. ∗A significant difference from the control group (P < 0.05). #A significant difference from the alginate microbead group (P < 0.05). †A significant difference from the ASC group (P < 0.05). Scale bar = 100 μm.