Literature DB >> 30046123

Comparative mangrove metagenome reveals global prevalence of heavy metals and antibiotic resistome across different ecosystems.

Madangchanok Imchen1, Ranjith Kumavath2, Debmalya Barh3,4,5, Aline Vaz6, Aristóteles Góes-Neto6, Sandeep Tiwari5, Preetam Ghosh7, Alice R Wattam8, Vasco Azevedo5.   

Abstract

The mangrove ecosystem harbors a complex microbial community that plays crucial role in biogeochemical cycles. In this study, we analyzed mangrove sediments from India using de novo whole metagenome next generation sequencing (NGS) and compared their taxonomic and functional community structures to mangrove metagenomics samples from Brazil and Saudi Arabia. The most abundant phyla in the mangroves of all three countries was Proteobacteria, followed by Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. A total of 1,942 genes were found to be common across all the mangrove sediments from each of the three countries. The mangrove resistome consistently showed high resistance to fluoroquinolone and acriflavine. A comparative study of the mangrove resistome with other ecosystems shows a higher frequency of heavy metal resistance in mangrove and terrestrial samples. Ocean samples had a higher abundance of drug resistance genes with fluoroquinolone and methicillin resistance genes being as high as 28.178% ± 3.619 and 10.776% ± 1.823. Genes involved in cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance were higher in the mangrove (23.495% ± 4.701) and terrestrial (27.479% ± 4.605) ecosystems. Our comparative analysis of samples collected from a variety of habitats shows that genes involved in resistance to both heavy metals and antibiotics are ubiquitous, irrespective of the ecosystem examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30046123      PMCID: PMC6060162          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29521-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Mangroves are estuarine ecosystems composed of saline tolerant plants and are found in 60–70% of the coastal areas, exclusively in tropical and subtropical regions[1]. They are exposed to fresh and oceanic water, experiencing a wide variation of salinity throughout the tidal cycles[2]. Mangroves are important as they are a rich reservoir of microbial diversity and act as a buffer zone between land and sea. Furthermore, mangroves are also a source of novel enzymes and small biomolecules such as LipA-like lipase[3], aspergilumamide-A peptide[4], pyrrolizidine alkaloid penibruguieramine-A[5], GH44 family endoglucanase[6], pullularins E, F peptides[7] and salt-tolerant endo-β-1, 4-glucanase Cel5A[8]. They also serve as a potential phytostabilizer to absorb heavy metal pollutants in industrial areas[9]. In addition, recent studies have shown that mangroves can enhance fish abundance[10] and provide an optimal environment for microbial communities, which, in turn, help in nutrient recycling, by sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB), methanogenic archaea[11]. Unfortunately, mangroves are under the threat of extinction, having experienced 35% in habitat loss in the last quarter century due to human activities[12,13]. In spite of the need for extensive studies on mangroves microbial community, they have largely been neglected[14,15]. As most microorganisms are unculturable, traditional culture-dependent and fingerprinting methods have been inadequate in accessing the taxonomic and functional diversity of these ecosystems[1,16]. There are few metagenomic studies about the microbial communities in mangrove from the Brazil[17], India[18] and the Red Sea region of Saudi Arabia of the grey mangrove Avicennia marina[19]. Our recent report on mangrove ecosystem has focused on microbial community structure and an overview on functional capabilities[18]. The primary objective of our work is to compare the structure and function of the biotic communities of mangroves in India, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia. The following topics are addressed by our study: (i) the comparison of the taxa composition, richness and relative abundance among the study areas; and (ii) functional diversity analyses for the gene composition, richness and relative abundance of genes among the study areas. A robust analysis was performed for preferential metabolic process, drug and heavy metal resistomes, that were further compared among distinct ecosystems.

Materials and Methods

Sampling

The samples were collected in 2015 during the month of mid-December in the following four sites Kumbla (KMA) (N12°35′39.101″, E74°56′47.842″), Valpadananam (VPM) (N9° 59′ 47.636″, E76° 14′ 49.882″), Kavayi (KAY) (N12° 5′ 17.83″, E75° 10′ 33.706″) and Bangramanjeshwar (BHN) (N12° 42′ 29.998″, E74° 54′ 2.716″), all of which are located within Kerala, India. All the samples had indirect exposure to anthropogenic activities resulting from household drainage. Three soil subsamples (~250 g) of the mangrove rhizosphere from the upper 20 cm depth were collected from each site using both hand gloves and sterilized polythene bags. All the samples were transported to the laboratory and processed within 48 hours.

Metagenomic DNA extraction

Metagenomic DNA from the samples was extracted using soil extraction kits (MoBio PowerSoil). There was deviation from the manufacturer’s instructions, with the elution time extended to 30 minutes at 37 °C. The subsamples in triplicates from the same collection site were pooled and were sequenced using Illumina HiSeq platform 2500 at SciGenome Labs Pvt Ltd, Cochin (India).

Quality control and annotation pipeline of the indian samples

The raw fastQ reads of Kumbla (KMA), Valpadananam (VPM), Kavayi (KAY) and Bangramanjeshwar (BHN) samples were uploaded to the Metagenome Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (MG-RAST) server (http://metagenomics.anl.gov/)[20] for analysis. The pipeline, in brief, joins the mate pairs and trims off low quality regions using SolexaQA[21] followed by dereplication and artificially duplicated reads (ADRs) analysis[22] using DRISEE (Duplicate Read Inferred Sequencing Error Estimation)[23]. Sequences showing similarity to fly, mouse, cow and humans were removed using Bowtie[24]. Annotation was done against the RefSeq[25] and Subsystems database[26,27] for diversity and functional analysis, respectively.

Comparative analysis of metagenomes across distinct mangrove areas

The metagenomic data from this study was compared to samples from Brazil[17] and Saudi Arabia[19], both of which are available at MG-RAST server (Table 1). Brazilian mangrove data[17] consisted of four different samples that had different anthropogenic impacts. The BrMgv01 and BrMgv02 samples were obtained from two different sites that had experienced an oil spill in 1983. The first sample did not show any strong effects from the oil spill but the second sample still show oil effects. BrMgv3 was collected in a site near an urban area while the last sample, BrMgv04, was isolated from what was determined to be pristine conditions. A second dataset collected in Saudi Arabia also had a total of four samples (RSMgr01, RSMgr02, RSMgr03 and RSMgr04) collected from the rhizosphere of Avicennia marina, commonly known as the grey mangrove, in the Red Sea[19]. All samples are available at MG-RAST.
Table 1

Samples from this study and our previous study along with other publicly available datasets were compared for diversity and functional analysis.

Sample IDMG-RAST IDLocationCountrySample TypeSample InfoReference
MG_KAYmgm4667575.3ValapattanamIndiaMangroveMangrove rhizosphere from Arabian Sea coast with moderate impact from anthropogenic activities.This study
MG_VPMmgm4667708.3KumblaIndiaMangrove
MG_BNHmgm4667773.3KavvayiIndiaMangrove
MG_KMAmgm4667861.3BangramanjeshwarIndiaMangrove
PGDmgm4671368.3PanangodIndiaMangroveImchen et al.[18]
MALmgm4671369.3MadakalIndiaMangrove
PYNmgm4671370.3PyannurIndiaMangrove
VL1mgm4671371.3VallarpadamIndiaMangrove
BRMgv-1mgm4451033.3BertiogaBrazilMangroveArea free of oil contaminationAndreote et al.[17]
BRMgv-2mgm4451034.3BertiogaBrazilMangroveArea highly impacted by the oil contamination
BrMgv-3mgm4451035.3BertiogaBrazilMangroveMangrove near the city, under anthropogenic pressure
BrMgv-4mgm4451036.3CananeiaBrazilMangroveLocated in a preservation area, under pristine conditions
RSMgr01mgm4523017.3ThuwalSaudi ArabiaMangroveGray mangroves (Avicennia marina) samples collected from a 10 cm depth in Red SeaAlzubaidy et al.[19]
RSMgr02mgm4523018.3ThuwalSaudi ArabiaMangrove
RSMgr03mgm4523019.3ThuwalSaudi ArabiaMangrove
RSMgr04mgm4523020.3ThuwalSaudi ArabiaMangrove
Sargasso Station 11 (GS000a)mgm4441570.3Sargasso SeaBermudaOceanOcean SampleGlobal Ocean Sampling Expedition (Rusch et al.[31]; Williamson et al.[32])
North American East Coast (GS013)mgm4441585.3Off Nags Head, NCUnited States of AmericaOcean
Panama Canal (GS020)mgm4441590.3Lake Gatun, PanamaPanamaOcean
Eastern Tropical Pacific (GS021)mgm4441591.3Eastern Tropical Pacific, Gulf of PanamaPanamaOcean
Galapagos Islands (GS027)mgm4441595.3Galapagos Islands, DevilEcuadorOcean
Galapagos Islands (GS028)mgm4441596.4Galapagos Islands, Coastal FloreanaEcuadorOcean
Hypersaline Lagoon (GS033)mgm4441599.3Punta Cormorant, Hypersaline Lagoon, Floreana IslandEcuadorOcean
Wolf Island (GS035)mgm4441601.3Galapagos Islands - Wolf IslandEcuadorOcean
Indian Ocean (GS113)mgm4441610.3Indian OceanNAOcean
West of the Seychelles (GS114)mgm4441611.3Indian Ocean - 500 Miles west of the Seychelles in the Indian OceanNAOcean
St. Anne Island (GS117a)mgm4441613.3Indian Ocean - St. Anne Island, SeychellesSeychellesOcean
Indian Ocean (GS121)mgm4441614.3Indian Ocean - International water between Madagascar and South AfricaNAOcean
West coast Zanzibar (GS149)mgm4441618.3Indian Ocean - West coast Zanzibar (Tanzania), harbour regionTanzaniaOcean
Eastern Tropical Pacific (GS023)mgm4441661.3Eastern Tropical Pacific, 30 miles from Cocos IslandCosta RicaOcean
Warm seep, Roca Redonda (GS030)mgm4441662.3Galapagos Islands - Warm seep, Roca RedondaEcuadorOcean
Fernandina Island (GS030)mgm4442626.3Upwelling, Fernandina IslandEcuadorOcean
Forest Soil, Puerto Ricomgm4446153.3subtropical lower montane wet forest in the Luquillo experimental forestPuerto RicoForestLuquillo Experimental Forest soilDeAngelis et al.[29]
PE6_r1mgm4477807.3Manu national park, PeruUSAForestTropical forestFierer et al.[30]
AR3_r1mgm4477875.3Misiones, ArgentinaUSAForest
BZ1_r1mgm4477876.3Bonanza creek lter, Alaska, USAUSAForestBoreal forest
CL1_r1mgm4477877.3Calhoun experimental forest, south Carolina, USAUSAForestTemperate deciduous forest
DF1_r1mgm4477899.3Duke forest, north Carolina, USAUSAForest
WS-8mgm4528934.3BjornstorpSwedenAgricultureWinter wheat fieldManoharan et al.[28]
WS-16mgm4529786.3BjornstorpSwedenAgriculture
WS-24mgm4529373.3BjornstorpSwedenAgriculture
WS-72mgm4527652.3BjornstorpSwedenAgriculture
GL-8mgm4528937.3BjornstorpSwedenGrasslandGrassland nearby the wheat field
GL-16mgm4529787.3BjornstorpSwedenGrassland
GL-24mgm4529374.3BjornstorpSwedenGrassland
GL-72mgm4527653.3BjornstorpSwedenGrassland
Samples from this study and our previous study along with other publicly available datasets were compared for diversity and functional analysis.

Comparative analysis of resistance to antibiotics and heavy metals in various ecosystems

For resistome analysis, the twelve mangrove datasets as described above and four mangrove datasets from our previous study[18] were included. In addition, datasets collected from soil samples in four agricultural and adjacent grassland samples from Sweden[28] were added. Six different forest soil samples from Puerto Rico[29] and USA[30] were included, as were sixteen oceanic soil samples from the Global Ocean Sampling Expedition[31,32] (Table 1).

Analysis of metagenomic data

Venn diagrams were generated using the Venny 2.0 program[33]. Normality testing using the Shapiro-Wilk test and the Kruskal-Wallis “Nemenyi” tests was performed to evaluate whether the OTU’s and functional genes abundances were different within and between the ecosystems using R[34] and PAST[35]. The dataset was standardized dividing each OTU abundance value by the sum of all abundances in each sample. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to compare the microbiota of each site using the vegan package[36]. Multiple linear regressions were conducted with the first two PCs obtained in the PCA analysis and the site as an independent variable. All the analyses were performed using R software[34].

Availability of data and materials

The raw fastQ files for the Kerala India samples were uploaded in MG-RAST server and publicly available from the MG-RAST server under the following IDs: mgm4667575.3, mgm4667708.3, mgm4667773.3, and mgm4667861.3. The other publicly available samples used in this study were obtained from the MG-RAST server under the following ids: mgm4671368.3, mgm4671369.3, mgm4671370.3, mgm4671371.3, mgm4451033.3, mgm4451034.3, mgm4451035.3, mgm4451036.3, mgm4523017.3, mgm4523018.3, mgm4523019.3, mgm4523020.3, mgm4441570.3, mgm4441585.3, mgm4441590.3, mgm4441591.3, mgm4441595.3, mgm4441596.4, mgm4441599.3, mgm4441601.3, mgm4441610.3, mgm4441611.3, mgm4441613.3, mgm4441614.3, mgm4441618.3, mgm4441661.3, mgm4441662.3, mgm4442626.3, mgm4446153.3, mgm4477807.3, mgm4477875.3, mgm4477876.3, mgm4477877.3, mgm4477899.3, mgm4528934.3, mgm4529786.3, mgm4529373.3, mgm4527652.3, mgm4528937.3, mgm4529787.3, mgm4529374.3, mgm4527653.3.

Results

The sequencing from the four India datasets resulted in a total of 9 GB, of which 32,080,253 reads were obtained with an average length ranging from 252 ± 9 bp to 409 ± 139 bp. After quality control pipeline, 13 ± 3.08% reads were assigned to ribosomal RNA genes, 38.56 ± 4.41% to predicted proteins with known functions, and 48.62 ± 6.45% to predicted proteins with unknown function (hypothetical proteins) (Table 2).
Table 2

Statistical analysis of the annotation results for all metagenomic samples used from MG-RAST.

Sample IDUpload: bp CountUpload: Sequences CountUpload: Mean Sequence LengthUpload: Mean GC percentArtificial Duplicate Reads: Sequence CountPost QC: bp CountPost QC: Sequences CountPost QC: Mean Sequence LengthPost QC: Mean GC percentProcessed: Predicted Protein FeaturesProcessed: Predicted rRNA FeaturesAlignment: Identified Protein FeaturesAlignment: Identified rRNA FeaturesAnnotation: Identified Functional Categories
MG_KAY1,063,207,094 bp2,600,216409 ± 139 bp54 ± 9 %30,782478,643,511 bp2,330,736205 ± 68 bp56 ± 10 %1,880,502219,146609,0891,433484,220
MGVPM1,206,841,116 bp2,956,271408 ± 139 bp48 ± 9 %13,768479,789,043 bp2,607,133184 ± 65 bp51 ± 12 %2,103,517258,212623,6291,734485,588
MG_BNH3,317,193,870 bp13,142,449252 ± 9 bp49 ± 8 %1,597,9122,254,033,431 bp10,931,395206 ± 56 bp50 ± 9 %8,394,321566,4903,028,7443,6412,396,156
MGKMA3,416,879,669 bp13,381,317255 ± 17 bp48 ± 10 %1,219,8842,423,281,285 bp11,516,112210 ± 59 bp49 ± 11 %9,956,122701,7203,190,5264,1842,497,249
PGD1,987,586,930 bp7,886,422252 ± 7 bp56 ± 10 %1,108,4611,148,618,254 bp5,928,096194 ± 64 bp57 ± 11 %3,750,581487,2691,459,3193,2861,214,414
MAL1,845,380,076 bp7,217,730256 ± 16 bp53 ± 11 %76,5581,303,758,395 bp6,457,605202 ± 68 bp54 ± 11 %4,608,323525,9931,625,5953,0561,271,359
PYN2,241,809,528 bp8,803,250255 ± 14 bp52 ± 10 %90,9531,525,223,003 bp7,849,891194 ± 66 bp53 ± 11 %5,937,271623,1711,843,3052,9861,439,895
VL12,156,410,938 bp8,425,778256 ± 17 bp54 ± 9 %251,6891,474,646,474 bp7,362,146200 ± 68 bp54 ± 10 %5,545,975589,2271,727,8293,0161,356,152
BRMgv-158,801,025 bp249,993235 ± 111 bp56 ± 10 %12,04853,144,117 bp231,702229 ± 105 bp56 ± 10 %213,268191,085085,285
BRMgv-255,077,381 bp231,233238 ± 107 bp55 ± 11 %12,27349,736,607 bp213,348233 ± 101 bp54 ± 11 %198,445179,09412373,440
BrMgv-353,292,298 bp214,921248 ± 112 bp56 ± 11 %30,62443,781,595 bp179,384244 ± 108 bp56 ± 11 %164,16922,11879,07413472,636
BrMgv-448,522,914 bp217,605223 ± 107 bp55 ± 11 %16,40142,070,955 bp194,797216 ± 101 bp54 ± 11 %175,067170,04510465,144
RSMgr01717,402,333 bp1,267,409566 ± 86 bp51 ± 10 %76,696270,309,281 bp1,089,202248 ± 100 bp51 ± 10 %1,011,211131,532256,422769202,924
RSMgr02799,123,615 bp1,416,928564 ± 87 bp52 ± 11 %102,162306,144,677 bp1,211,004253 ± 100 bp52 ± 11 %1,144,572146,256350,658856272,608
RSMgr03477,029,111 bp854,451558 ± 72 bp51 ± 12 %45,503214,120,294 bp762,883281 ± 106 bp52 ± 11 %733,49487,862243,816553188,420
RSMgr04566,715,841 bp1,045,353542 ± 61 bp52 ± 11 %94,741268,607,839 bp894,444300 ± 117 bp52 ± 11 %863,54799,227334,041866262,564
Sargasso Station 11 (GS000a)658,755,696 bp644,5511,022 ± 73 bp52 ± 15 %0658,755,696 bp644,5511,022 ± 73 bp52 ± 15 %509,29712416,6661,839390,782
North American East Coast (GS013)149,007,574 bp138,0331,080 ± 107 bp44 ± 11 %0149,007,574 bp138,0331,080 ± 107 bp44 ± 11 %179,6062110,197475100,559
Panama Canal (GS020)315,151,139 bp296,3551,063 ± 88 bp47 ± 13 %0315,151,139 bp296,3551,063 ± 88 bp47 ± 13 %340,6696197,162661184,372
Eastern Tropical Pacific (GS021)143,454,700 bp131,7981,088 ± 70 bp39 ± 11 %0143,454,700 bp131,7981,088 ± 70 bp39 ± 11 %164,2153104,92435698,140
Galapagos Islands (GS027)237,326,008 bp222,0801,069 ± 81 bp37 ± 9 %0237,326,008 bp222,0801,069 ± 81 bp37 ± 9 %279,7834202,252766189,356
Galapagos Islands (GS028)205,008,796 bp189,0521,084 ± 79 bp36 ± 8 %0205,008,796 bp189,0521,084 ± 79 bp36 ± 8 %238,0614169,294580158,043
Hypersaline Lagoon (GS033)729,708,089 bp692,2551,054 ± 96 bp59 ± 8 %0729,708,089 bp692,2551,054 ± 96 bp59 ± 8 %572,13013316,6231,326298,336
Wolf Island (GS035)151,840,270 bp140,8141,078 ± 102 bp36 ± 8 %0151,840,270 bp140,8141,078 ± 102 bp36 ± 8 %173,7053130,000407122,564
Indian Ocean (GS113)118,339,154 bp109,7001,079 ± 63 bp35 ± 8 %0118,339,154 bp109,7001,079 ± 63 bp35 ± 8 %144,6862103,47338496,803
West of the Seychelles (GS114)345,285,679 bp348,823990 ± 73 bp35 ± 8 %0345,285,679 bp348,823990 ± 73 bp35 ± 8 %426,2176287,233940265,580
St. Anne Island (GS117a)339,868,195 bp346,952980 ± 71 bp35 ± 8 %0339,868,195 bp346,952980 ± 71 bp35 ± 8 %429,8556285,584949266,630
Indian Ocean (GS121)119,426,081 bp110,7201,079 ± 58 bp35 ± 8 %0119,426,081 bp110,7201,079 ± 58 bp35 ± 8 %144,4132106,487390100,199
West coast Zanzibar (GS149)111,178,553 bp110,9841,002 ± 62 bp38 ± 11 %0111,178,553 bp110,9841,002 ± 62 bp38 ± 11 %142,5382104,08141997,687
Eastern Tropical Pacific (GS023)143,626,589 bp133,0511,079 ± 76 bp36 ± 9 %0143,626,589 bp133,0511,079 ± 76 bp36 ± 9 %171,1113123,834468114,444
Warm seep, Roca Redonda (GS030)391,694,924 bp359,1521,091 ± 92 bp35 ± 7 %0391,694,924 bp359,1521,091 ± 92 bp35 ± 7 %379,8227294,1161,379278,212
Fernandina Island (GS030)461,671,889 bp436,4011,058 ± 87 bp34 ± 8 %0461,671,889 bp436,4011,058 ± 87 bp34 ± 8 %520,6768386,5141,407366,844
Forest Soil, Puerto Rico322,213,082 bp782,404412 ± 103 bp60 ± 6 %83,075279,379,947 bp642,197435 ± 74 bp60 ± 6 %677,00739,548341,249178314,106
PE6_r1920,666,200 bp9,206,662100 ± 0 bp61 ± 8 %116,635909,002,500 bp9,090,025100 ± 0 bp61 ± 8 %8,458,4712,165,6064,213,3313,1883,664,108
AR3_r1523,535,200 bp5,235,352100 ± 0 bp62 ± 10 %58,738517,661,200 bp5,176,612100 ± 0 bp62 ± 9 %4,773,0781,295,7182,400,1061,6122,082,380
BZ1_r1654,390,300 bp6,543,903100 ± 0 bp58 ± 10 %113,593643,030,800 bp6,430,308100 ± 0 bp58 ± 10 %5,855,7371,515,0962,880,7483,4082,512,398
CL1_r1640,294,000 bp6,402,940100 ± 0 bp61 ± 9 %154,353624,858,500 bp6,248,585100 ± 0 bp61 ± 9 %5,776,0931,516,2882,985,4082,8452,611,586
DF1_r1389,004,400 bp3,890,044100 ± 0 bp62 ± 9 %39,901385,014,100 bp3,850,141100 ± 0 bp62 ± 9 %3,581,817958,7471,893,4491,7431,656,393
WS-836,416,512 bp99,966364 ± 227 bp64 ± 6 %5,72033,518,514 bp92,955361 ± 221 bp64 ± 6 %82,94712,83135,8282831,106
WS-1644,629,285 bp124,818358 ± 221 bp64 ± 6 %6,92441,098,149 bp116,225354 ± 215 bp64 ± 6 %102,14115,89568,1414957,581
WS-2448,270,036 bp138,970347 ± 219 bp64 ± 6 %7,79844,281,009 bp129,198343 ± 213 bp64 ± 6 %109,80017,91474,3274463,362
WS-7239,046,366 bp113,014346 ± 214 bp64 ± 6 %6,21335,885,214 bp105,190341 ± 208 bp64 ± 6 %89,12114,67063,6434255,032
GL-836,451,314 bp105,580345 ± 220 bp64 ± 6 %5,82433,387,051 bp98,160340 ± 213 bp64 ± 6 %84,91813,71242,3692634,713
GL-1639,044,729 bp113,862343 ± 211 bp64 ± 5 %6,43835,527,706 bp105,402337 ± 203 bp64 ± 5 %91,87414,31857,2683347,623
GL-2442,416,465 bp122,694346 ± 217 bp64 ± 5 %7,07038,835,959 bp113,806341 ± 211 bp64 ± 5 %95,37615,53061,1733351,459
GL-7232,394,105 bp96,092337 ± 206 bp65 ± 5 %5,17529,613,637 bp89,281332 ± 198 bp65 ± 5 %75,13612,05050,2962242,990
Statistical analysis of the annotation results for all metagenomic samples used from MG-RAST.

Analysis at domain level

All the samples had sequences that map to the Bacteria, Archaea, Eukarya and Viruses. A small percentage of the sequences (0.011 to 0.75%) were not assigned to any organism. Bacteria were the most abundant domain recovered from all the mangrove datasets, ranging from 94.8 to 99.2% of the total. Regardless of the low sequence proportion compared to other domains, the number of sequences affiliated with viruses was the highest in Saudi Arabia samples (Fig. 1B).
Figure 1

Doughnut chart representing the distribution of domain, phyla and genus of (A) Brazil (BRMgv-1, BRMgv-2, BrMgv-3 and BrMgv-4) (B) Saudi Arabia (RSMgr01, RSMgr02, RSMgr03 and RSMgr04) and (C) India (MG_KAY, MG_VPM, MG_BNH and MG_KMA) (sample labels from inside to outside in doughnut wheels).

Doughnut chart representing the distribution of domain, phyla and genus of (A) Brazil (BRMgv-1, BRMgv-2, BrMgv-3 and BrMgv-4) (B) Saudi Arabia (RSMgr01, RSMgr02, RSMgr03 and RSMgr04) and (C) India (MG_KAY, MG_VPM, MG_BNH and MG_KMA) (sample labels from inside to outside in doughnut wheels). The first two components in the PCA explained more than 98% of variation and there was a clear separation among the samples (Fig. 2A). To determine if the separation among mangrove samples isolated from the different countries were statistically significant, the scores of the first two PC (Principal Component) were used as dependent variables in the multiple linear regression. The clustering effect in the first PC was due to the community abundance at domain level from India. On the other hand, all communities were different when analyzed by the second PC (Table 3). Although the reads mean frequency of Bacteria was not statistically different among the countries, the higher proportion in Indian samples (96.7–99.2%) could explain the separation of this country from the other two (Brazil: 95.1–96.7%; Saudi Arabia: 94.7–96.2%) in the first PC.
Figure 2

PCA plot of domain and bacterial phyla.

Table 3

A multiple regression analysis of the first two principal components (PCs) performed at the domain level.

VariableEstimatesStd. ErrorT value P
PC1
  R2 = 53.4%Saudi Arabia0.00790.005991.3190.2198
  STD = 0.0119Brazil0.00740.005991.2510.2425
  P = 0.071India−0.01540.00599−2.570 0.0302
PC2
  R2 = 77.2%Saudi Arabia−0.00350.00085−4.157 0.0024
  STD = 0.0017Brazil0.00660.001215.481 0.0004
  P = 0.001India0.00400.001213.337 0.0087
PCA plot of domain and bacterial phyla. A multiple regression analysis of the first two principal components (PCs) performed at the domain level.

Analysis at phylum level

A total of 66 phyla were recovered from all samples. The richness at phylum level was quite similar across the geographic localities, except for the following Eukarya phyla: Annelida, Brachiopoda, Chytridiomycota, Echiura, Entoprocta, Glomeromycota and Xenoturbellida, which were found exclusively in the Indian samples. The Kruskal-Wallis comparison of the reads abundances among the countries indicated that Brazil (Fig. 1A) had 23 and 11 phyla statistically different from Saudi Arabia and India (Fig. 1C), respectively. Only 5 phyla were statistically different between Saudi Arabia and India. Twenty-eight bacterial phyla were retrieved from all mangroves of the three different countries. The most abundant phylum among the samples was Proteobacteria, which accounted for 50.7 to 64.28% of the sequences in Brazil, 62.6 to 64.2% in Saudi Arabia and 56.7 to 90.5% in India. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the second or the third most frequent bacterial phyla recovered. The PCA using only the frequency of the bacteria phyla showed a clear separation of India from Brazil and Saudi Arabia mainly due to Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes reads abundance (Fig. 2B). Five archaeal phyla (Crenarchaeota, Korarchaeota, Thaumarchaeota and Nanoarchaeota) were recovered from all samples in all countries (Fig. 3A). The Crenarchaeota abundance was statistically higher in Brazilian samples than in the other countries (BR-SA: P = 0.043; BR- SA: P = 0.021) while Euryarchaeota (P = 0.021) and Korarchaeota (P = 0.043) abundances were statistically lower in India than in Brazil. Euryarchaeota was the most abundant among all archaeal phyla between and within all samples.
Figure 3

Bar chart of archaeal (A) phyla and (B) genera.

Bar chart of archaeal (A) phyla and (B) genera.

Overview of the dominant bacterial and archaeal genera

A total of 593 bacterial and 61 archaeal genera were recovered from all the collection sites (Supplementary Data 1). Most of the bacterial genera were present in all samples (Fig. 4), and all archaeal genera were obtained from all of the geographic locations.
Figure 4

Venn diagram representing the common microbiome diversity within the samples of (A) Brazil (B) Saudi Arabia (C) Kerala and (D) among the entire three sample group.

Venn diagram representing the common microbiome diversity within the samples of (A) Brazil (B) Saudi Arabia (C) Kerala and (D) among the entire three sample group. To get a clear picture of the dominant bacterial community, only those bacterial genera with more than 1% abundance in at least one sample were selected for further analysis. Fifty-four bacterial genera met this criterion (Fig. 1A–C). Most of these genera belonged to Proteobacteria followed by Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. Other phyla detected in decreasing order of abundance were Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi and Cyanobacteria. Since Archaea were found less frequently compared to bacteria, dominant archaeal genera were examined when they were 0.1% or more of the total sample population. Twenty archaeal genera (Fig. 3B) met this criterion, with Methanosarcina, Nitrosopumilus, Thermococcus, Pyrococcus, Archaeoglobus and Methanocaldococcs being the most abundant. The Indian sample MG_BNH did not have any archaeal genera with abundance higher than 0.1%.

Comparative functional analysis of mangrove sediments

A total of 7410 protein coding genes were annotated, with 1942 found in all samples and 1023 in only one sample (Supplementary Data 2). The comparison of the top 25 most abundant functional genes from all the samples consisted of 65 genes (Fig. 5). Protein metabolism was the most diversified function with 11 different sub-functions, which includes ATP-dependent protease La (EC 3.4.21.53) (0.282% ± 0.077) and diverse tRNA synthetase, such as valyl (EC 6.1.1.9) (0.266% ± 0.037), glycyl (EC 6.1.1.14) (0.089% ± 0.08), leucyl (EC 6.1.1.4) (0.246% ± 0.049) and lysyl (class II) (EC 6.1.1.6) (0.154% ± 0.068). Within the DNA replication and transcription functional category, DNA primase (EC 2.7.7.-) (0.13% ± 0.08) and DNA-directed RNA polymerase beta subunit (EC 2.7.7.6) (0.471% ± 0.13) were found most frequently. The most common gene in the Cell Division and Cell Cycle functional category was the carbamoyl-phosphate synthase large chain (EC 6.3.5.5) (0.369% ± 0.09). The metabolism of aromatic compounds through Long-chain-fatty-acid-CoA ligase (EC 6.2.1.3) exhibited a similar pattern of low frequency between MG_VPM (0.165%) and the MG_BNH (0.206%) while the remaining samples showed higher level of abundance (0.45% ± 0.05). Kruskal-Wallis comparison of the most abundant functional genes also indicated statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between AS, BR and ID (Supplementary Data 3).
Figure 5

The top 25 most abundant functions from each sample annotated against subsystems.

The top 25 most abundant functions from each sample annotated against subsystems. There were also three genes related to antibiotics resistance and toxic compounds: Cation efflux system protein CusA (0.311% ± 0.101), Acriflavine resistance protein (0.428% ± 0.0843) and Topoisomerase IV subunit A (EC 5.99.1.3) (0.136% ± 0.073). Cation efflux system protein CusA is involved in resistance to copper and silver while Acriflavine resistance protein and Topoisomerase IV subunit A are involved in resistance to antiseptic Acriflavine and fluoroquinolones antibiotics respectively, which are both clinically relevant[37-39]. Overall, the DNA-directed RNA polymerase beta subunit (EC 2.7.7.6) (0.471% ± 0.131) was the most abundant gene followed by Acriflavine resistance protein (0.42% ± 0.08). Within the resistome, Acriflavine resistance protein was the most abundant followed by Cation efflux system protein CusA and Topoisomerase IV subunit A as the 2nd and 3rd most abundant features. All the samples between and within the group of India, Brazil and Saudi Arabia showed high abundance (0.428% ± 0.08) of Acriflavine resistance protein with no significant difference within the samples (p 0.4433).

Comparative functional analysis across different ecosystems

The high abundance of acriflavine resistance protein and the widespread presence of genes related to fluoroquinolone resistance in all the mangroves samples was intriguing and resulted in a deeper examination of the resistance to antibiotics and toxic compounds in the mangroves and other ecosystems. Publicly available metagenomes of marine and terrestrial (forest, grassland and agricultural soil samples) ecosystems were compared to the mangroves sediments (Table 1). Remarkable patterns were observed across the ecosystems showing sharp distinction between the terrestrial and aquatic sites. Enrichment of Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps were similar in oceans (23.274% ± 2.931) and mangroves (25.406% ± 2.922) although statistically different (p = 0.028). Interestingly, terrestrial samples had a much lower abundance (14.897% ± 4.116) (p < 0.005) of Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps (Fig. 6A). However, a deeper look into the functional level of Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps shows acriflavine resistance protein to be highly enriched in all the samples irrespective of ecosystem and anthropogenic activities. The relative abundance of the acriflavine resistance was similar in mangroves and terrestrial which were in turn significantly different from Ocean (p < 0.005) (Fig. 6B). Similarly, other clinically relevant antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) such as those related to resistance to fluoroquinolones and beta-lactamase were significantly higher (p < 0.005) in ocean (28.178% ± 3.619, 9.913% ± 2.208) compared to mangroves (9.82% ± 3.776, 5.489% ± 0.742) and terrestrial (11.18% ± 8.327, 10.247% ± 5.826). Methicillin resistance was found to be statistically different in all the ecosystems although the relative percentage was more similar between mangrove (3.034% ± 0.808) and terrestrial (2.159% ± 0.682) as compared to Ocean (10.776% ± 1.823) respectively. In addition, resistance genes related to heavy metals such as cobalt, zinc and cadmium were significantly (p < 0.015) different in Ocean, Mangroves, and Terrestrial ecosystems (Supplementary data 4).
Figure 6

(A) Bar chart of resistance to antibiotics and toxic compounds and (B) Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps in Ocean, Mangroves and Land (Forest, Agriculture and Grassland).

(A) Bar chart of resistance to antibiotics and toxic compounds and (B) Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps in Ocean, Mangroves and Land (Forest, Agriculture and Grassland).

Discussion

In this study, whole-metagenome of Indian mangrove samples were sequenced to examine the community structure and functional content using the Illumina technology. These were compared to samples isolated from mangroves in Brazil[17] and Saudi Arabia[19], which were sequenced by a different platform (Roche 454). Although the three datasets were generated by two different NGS platforms, our analysis showed that they had similar taxonomic diversity in their microbial communites[40].

Bacterial and archaeal diversity in the mangrove sediments

The bacterial phyla, Proteobacteria (61.2% ± 10.82), was the most abundant in the samples examined from each of the geographic locations (Fig. 1A–C). Proteobacteria had previously been noted as being highly abundant in mangrove samples[41]. This phylum has a high metabolic diversity, with a wide distribution in marine environments, playing an important role in nutrient cycling[42]. The second most frequently found phyla within the mangrove metagenomics samples we examined was Archaea. Members belonging to this phylum inhabit extreme environments, playing important roles in the biogeochemical cycles. However, our knowledge as to the niche they occupy, and the role they play in the mangrove microbial community is still limited[43]. Within the archaeal kingdom, Euryarchaeota (81.29% ± 7.993) were found most frequently within and between all the samples when compared to other Archaeal phyla (Fig. 3), and were also found to be highly abundant in mangrove sediments of Sundarbans (India)[43] and other ecosystems such as marine sediment (North Sea of Atlantic Ocean)[44] and German bight[45] (a shallow region of the North Sea that borders Germany). The archaeal community we found in the mangroves had many methanogen genera, including Methanothermobacter, Methanocaldococcus, Methanococcus, Methanosarcina, Methanococcoides, Methanospirillum, Methanoculleus, Methanosaeta, and Methanoregula. The diversity and presence of these specific genera is an indication that methane metabolism is important in mangrove ecosystems. The archaeal ammonia oxidizer Nitrosopumilus (0.15% ± 0.2) and Cenarchaeum (0.03% ± 0.04) of the phylum Thaumarchaeota was also observed in all samples. At the bacterial genus level, Pseudomonas (2.61% ± 1.7) was found to be most abundant in MG_BNH (8.06%) (India). Pseudomonas spp. thrives in many diverse environments that range from individual humans to the rhizosphere[46]. Pseudomonas has been found to influence plant growth[19,46,47] by releasing siderophores, antibiotics, biosurfactants and solubilization of potassium into forms that are accessible for plants, and has also been noted for its critical nitrogen fixation role in the mangrove ecosystem[48,49]. In addition, they are also tolerant to aromatic hydrocarbons, organic and heavy metal contaminants[50,51]. Another aromatic hydrocarbons degrader, Geobacter, was found at a similar frequency in the samples from Brazil (2.65% ± 0.08) and Saudi Arabia (2.05% ± 0.6). Its presence in the Indian samples (1.03% ± 0.53) differed statistically (p 0.02) from the samples of the other two countries. Geobacter has also been found in petroleum contaminated environments and pristine deep aquifers capable of Fe (III) reduction[52] and are also strong candidates for immobilization uranium[53] (U(VI)) and bioremediation of aromatic hydrocarbon contaminants. Neptuniibacter, a copiotrophic microorganism which can degrade aromatic hydrocarbon such as carbazole[54], was the 3rd most abundant genus in all the samples (1.61% ± 4.61). The high standard deviation was due to the overwhelmingly high frequency in MG_BNH (16.91%) (Indian sample) that could be due to this region having higher anthropogenic activity when compared to the other samples. In addition, Marinobacter, a ubiquitous marine aromatic hydrocarbon degradation genus[55] of the Proteobacteria phylum, was significantly (p 0.0124) abundant in the Indian (3.15% ± 2.23) samples compared to Brazil (0.44% ± 0.04) and Saudi Arabia (0.82% ± 0.35). Our previous study also showed a dominance of Marinobacter in mangrove samples[18]. Genome analysis of Marinobacter has revealed its potentiality to survive in oil-polluted water[55] and has suggested that it could be used for bio-monitoring of oil spills in mangroves[56]. Two important genera from the phylum Actinobacteria, Streptomyces and Mycobacterium, were found. Mycobacterium were found at more significant frequency (p 0.0209) in Brazil (1.17% ± 0.34) than in Saudi Arabia (0.35% ± 0.03) or India (0.35% ± 0.16). Interestingly, a pristine Brazilian sample (BRMgv-1: 1.72%) and one that was highly impacted by human activity (BRMgv-2: 0.98%) had a higher frequency of Mycobacterium compared to the samples associated with anthropogenic activity (BRMgv-3: 1.19%), or to the sample from pristine (BRMgv-4: 0.79%) environment. It is interesting that Mycobacterium spp., such as M. chlorophenolicum, M. farcinogenes and M. austroafricanum, were observed in samples from mangrove sediments that were contaminated with PAH (Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon)[57]. Seven genera belonging to order Desulfobacterales were found in all samples and showed similar frequency across all samples. Desulfotalea is a psychrophilic genus[58]. Desulfovibrio is known to be aerotolerant[59]. Geobacter is recognized as an aromatic hydrocarbons degrader[60] and Pelobacter is an iron and sulfur-reducing mesophilic anaerobe[61]. These were significantly less abundant (p 0.0209, 0.034, 0.026 and 0.037 respectively) in Indian samples when compared to Brazil and Saudi Arabia. An ammonia oxidizing bacteria, Nitrosococcus (0.97% ± 0.28), was present in all the samples with no significant difference within or between the groups. Samples collected from mangroves in each of these countries shared a total of 97.9% of the OTUs, which accounted for 99.97% of the total reads abundance (Fig. 4). Similar results were obtained when compared to forest and vineyard soils[62]. The high number of shared OTUs between the mangroves corroborates the functional genes statistical analysis (Supplementary data 3) between the samples.

Resistance to antibiotics and heavy metals in various ecosystems

High abundance of fluoroquinolones and acriflavine resistance proteins were found in the mangrove samples of India, Brazil and Saudi Arabia irrespective of the collection site. In order to examine the consistency of these resistance genes in other ecosystems, whole metagenomic datasets from others studies, including[18], ocean[31,32], forest[29,30] agricultural and grassland soil samples[28] were compared, specifically targeting marine and terrestrial environments with and without anthropogenic activity (Table 1).

Heavy metal resistome in diverse ecosystems

The presence of genes involved in heavy metal resistance in rivers, activated sludges, aquaculture farm sediments, etc.[63,64] have been previously described. In our study, genes that play a role in the resistance to antibiotics and toxic compounds were found across all of the ecosystems. Cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance were found in all the samples, but the percentage of reads that mapped to these genes was found to be significantly lower (p < 0.01) in the samples collected from the ocean (5.713% ± 2.589) compared to those collected from mangroves (23.495% ± 4.701) or terrestrial (27.479% ± 4.605) ecosystems (Fig. 6). Among the genes that determine cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance, the cation efflux system protein CusA was the most abundant gene. CusA and the cation efflux system provide bacteria with resistance to copper and silver. Although copper is an essential element, it can be lethal to plants even at low concentrations[65] and can lead to several ill effects such as chlorosis, yellow coloration, and retardation of growth[66]. This copper resistance symbiotic bacterium is associated with plants found in mine tailings[67]. Metal ion solubility generally increases with decreasing pH[68], and the presence of CusA has been found to be associated with soil types with low pH[68]. Marine samples showed significantly lesser enrichment of CusA (5.37% ± 3.55), which could be due to the higher pH of marine water[69] and the lack of plants in this ecosystem. Another annotated function that was seen involved copper homeostasis, but all the ecosystems exhibited comparable level of this particular functionality (7.068% ± 1.154, 6.058% ± 1.343 and 7.238% ± 2.116 for marine, mangroves and terrestrial, respectively). Arsenic resistance genes were also found consistently across all the samples (Fig. 6) having significant difference in ocean vs. mangrove (p < 0.001) and terrestrial vs. mangrove (p < 0.002) ecosystem (Supplementary data 4). A recent study by Xiao et al.[70] demonstrated a similar presence of genes involved in arsenic metabolism in paddy soil, with the authors concluding that these genes play an important role in avoiding arsenic risk through biotransformation.

Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) patterns across ecosystems

Genes involved in antibiotic resistance have been observed in distinct patterns across different ecosystems[71]. In our study, the Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps functional category was the most abundant drug resistance function across all the ecosystems (Fig. 6A). Interestingly, among the subtypes within this functional category, Acriflavine resistance proteins were significantly abundant in every sample (Fig. 6B). Acriflavine has antibacterial properties and is used as an antibiotic[72]. It has been shown to have antiviral and antitumor activities through its topoisomerase inhibition properties[73,74]. The widespread prevalence of acriflavine resistance was also observed in the past from clinical samples in 11 Asian countries[75]. In the recent years, metagenomic analyses showed that acriflavine resistance genes were highly abundant in South China paddy soil[76] and aerobic activated sludge and anaerobically digested sludge[77]. In our analysis, we found that the acriflavine resistance genes were widespread in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems that had significant human activity or were from pristine environments (Fig. 6A and B). Fluoroquinolone drugs, which target DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, are widely used as the first line for nosocomial infections[78,79]. Fluoroquinolone as well as methicillin resistance gene were found to be significantly higher in marine (28.178% ± 3.619 and 10.776% ± 1.823 respectively, p < 0.001) as compared to mangroves (9.82% ± 3.776 and 3.034% ± 0.808, respectively) and terrestrial (11.18% ± 8.327 and 2.159% ± 0.682, respectively) ecosystems. Beta-lactamase was highly abundant in the marine (9.913% ± 2.208) and terrestrial (10.247% ± 5.826) ecosystems. Within the terrestrial samples, forest (4.38% ± 1.66) had similar abundance comparable to mangroves (5.489% ± 0.742) while the agricultural and grassland samples were found to be highly enriched (14.64% ± 3.54). Antibiotic-resistant genes have been found to be similarly abundant in soils that contain or lack manure[80]. Similarly, our result showed a high abundance of β-lactamases genes in agricultural and adjacent grasslands samples with comparable frequency while the forest and mangroves samples had relatively lesser abundance. The high abundance of β-lactamases in agricultural soil have been demonstrated in a recent functional metagenomic study by Lau et al.[81] who identified 34 new antibiotic resistance genes that were related to multi-drug efflux systems, indicating a potential high-level resistance towards aminoglycosides, sulfonamides, and a broad range of beta-lactams. As β-lactamases have been hypothesized to play a vital role in the survival of the bacteria in its natural habitat[82], the presence of the genes involved in this resistance have been noted in metagenomic samples from a variety of habitats. For instance, a proficient β-lactamase enzyme was isolated from Oceanobacillus iheyensis in the ocean sediments at a depth of 1050 meters[83]. Recently, a novel β-lactamase gene was discovered from Pelagibacterium halotolerans B2T, which was isolated from the East China Sea[84]. The high abundance of β-lactamases in oceans also indicates the rich diversity of enzymes and the promising prospects of novel antibiotic discoveries. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes have been found in diverse environments that include deep terrestrial subsurface, glacier ice core and samples collected from deep sea that have not been in contact with humans[83,85-88], but they are mostly present at non-inhibitory concentrations[89-91]. The antibiotic resistance genes were dominant in the resistome having significant differences among the ecosystems with the ocean having highest relative abundance compared to mangrove and terrestrial ecosystems (Supplementary data 4). It has been hypothesized that the function of such resistance genes in the natural environment could be related to some basic physiological processes such as biosynthesis of the cell wall[92,93], trafficking of signaling molecules, detoxification of metabolic intermediates[88] or antibiotic detoxification[88,94-96]. Untouched environments can have novel antibiotic resistance genes[97] that can give rise to more multidrug resistant strains via horizontal transfer when human activities encroach upon them. For instance, when soil samples from pre-and post-antibiotic areas were compared, plasmids from the earlier era had fewer antibiotic resistance genes[97,98] and this was followed by a significant rise in their presence in later sampes[99]. The notion of clinically relevant pathogens acquiring resistance genes from the environment is a likely possibility[97,100,101].

Conclusion

We have analysed the metagenomic profiles of mangrove sediments across India and compared them with publicly available samples from Brazil and Saudi Arabia mangrove. Distinct patterns unique to the Brazilian and Saudi Arabian mangroves were observed which differentiated them from samples collected in India. Although there were differences, a significant number of microbial genera were found to be present across all of the three geographic regions. Proteobacteria and Euryarchaeota were the most abundant phyla within and between all the mangroves for bacteria and archaea, respectively. A functional analysis that compared the mangroves samples with metagenomic sample taken from ocean, forest, agriculture and grassland showed the presence of highly enriched acrylflavine, copper, fluoroquinolone, β-lactamase and methilicin resistant genes distributed consistently in patterns throughout all the examined ecosystems. Further, our study showed that heavy metals and antibiotic resistance genes are founnd in microbial populations from mangroves and the other ecosystems, including both pristine areas and environments that experience significant human activity. The widespread existence of antibiotic resistance genes could be a warning bell, indicating a source of new genes that could further increase the rise in antimicrobial resistance that could have clinical significance. Dataset 1, 2, 3, and, 4
  88 in total

1.  Temporal changes in Sphingomonas and Mycobacterium populations in mangrove sediments contaminated with different concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

Authors:  Chuling Guo; Lin Ke; Zhi Dang; Nora Fungyee Tam
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Properties and distribution of a metallo-β-lactamase (ALI-1) from the fish pathogen Aliivibrio salmonicida LFI1238.

Authors:  Anders Kristiansen; Miriam Grgic; Bjørn Altermark; Ingar Leiros
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Metagenomic analysis of apple orchard soil reveals antibiotic resistance genes encoding predicted bifunctional proteins.

Authors:  Justin J Donato; Luke A Moe; Brandon J Converse; Keith D Smart; Flora C Berklein; Patricia S McManus; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  The independent cue and cus systems confer copper tolerance during aerobic and anaerobic growth in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  F W Outten; D L Huffman; J A Hale; T V O'Halloran
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-06-08       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Penicillin-binding protein 2 is essential for expression of high-level vancomycin resistance and cell wall synthesis in vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the enterococcal vanA gene complex.

Authors:  Anatoly Severin; Shang Wei Wu; Keiko Tabei; Alexander Tomasz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  An antibiotic-resistance enzyme from a deep-sea bacterium.

Authors:  Marta Toth; Clyde Smith; Hilary Frase; Shahriar Mobashery; Sergei Vakulenko
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 7.  Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance: a multifaceted threat.

Authors:  Jacob Strahilevitz; George A Jacoby; David C Hooper; Ari Robicsek
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  The microbiome of Brazilian mangrove sediments as revealed by metagenomics.

Authors:  Fernando Dini Andreote; Diego Javier Jiménez; Diego Chaves; Armando Cavalcante Franco Dias; Danice Mazzer Luvizotto; Francisco Dini-Andreote; Cristiane Cipola Fasanella; Maryeimy Varon Lopez; Sandra Baena; Rodrigo Gouvêa Taketani; Itamar Soares de Melo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  RNA-based assessment of diversity and composition of active archaeal communities in the German Bight.

Authors:  Bernd Wemheuer; Franziska Wemheuer; Rolf Daniel
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.273

10.  Diversity and Distribution of Archaea in the Mangrove Sediment of Sundarbans.

Authors:  Anish Bhattacharyya; Niladri Shekhar Majumder; Pijush Basak; Shayantan Mukherji; Debojyoti Roy; Sudip Nag; Anwesha Haldar; Dhrubajyoti Chattopadhyay; Suparna Mitra; Maitree Bhattacharyya; Abhrajyoti Ghosh
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.273

View more
  9 in total

1.  Carbohydrate metabolism genes dominant in a subtropical marine mangrove ecosystem revealed by metagenomics analysis.

Authors:  Huaxian Zhao; Bing Yan; Shuming Mo; Shiqing Nie; Quanwen Li; Qian Ou; Bo Wu; Gonglingxia Jiang; Jinli Tang; Nan Li; Chengjian Jiang
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.422

2.  Metagenomic landscape of taxonomy, metabolic potential and resistome of Sardinella longiceps gut microbiome.

Authors:  Tina Kollannoor Johny; Rinu Madhu Puthusseri; Sarita Ganapathy Bhat
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.552

3.  Metagenomic insights into surface water microbial communities of a South Asian mangrove ecosystem.

Authors:  Anwesha Ghosh; Ratul Saha; Punyasloke Bhadury
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.061

4.  Comparative metagenomics study reveals pollution induced changes of microbial genes in mangrove sediments.

Authors:  Yingdong Li; Liping Zheng; Yue Zhang; Hongbin Liu; Hongmei Jing
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A Meta-Omics Analysis Unveils the Shift in Microbial Community Structures and Metabolomics Profiles in Mangrove Sediments Treated with a Selective Actinobacterial Isolation Procedure.

Authors:  Miguel David Marfil-Santana; Anahí Martínez-Cárdenas; Analuisa Ruíz-Hernández; Mario Vidal-Torres; Norma Angélica Márquez-Velázquez; Mario Figueroa; Alejandra Prieto-Davó
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Contrasting Effects of Local Environmental and Biogeographic Factors on the Composition and Structure of Bacterial Communities in Arid Monospecific Mangrove Soils.

Authors:  T Thomson; M Fusi; M F Bennett-Smith; N Prinz; E Aylagas; S Carvalho; C E Lovelock; B H Jones; J I Ellis
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-01-05

7.  Ubiquitousness of Haloferax and Carotenoid Producing Genes in Arabian Sea Coastal Biosystems of India.

Authors:  Jamseel Moopantakath; Madangchanok Imchen; Ranjith Kumavath; Rosa María Martínez-Espinosa
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 5.118

8.  Effects of an external magnetic field on microbial functional genes and metabolism of activated sludge based on metagenomic sequencing.

Authors:  Shuying Geng; Weizhang Fu; Weifeng Chen; Shulian Zheng; Qi Gao; Jing Wang; Xiaohong Ge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Insights into Antagonistic Interactions of Multidrug Resistant Bacteria in Mangrove Sediments from the South Indian State of Kerala.

Authors:  Madangchanok Imchen; Ravali Krishna Vennapu; Preetam Ghosh; Ranjith Kumavath
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-12-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.