Literature DB >> 30045974

Role of stakeholders in Nigeria's tobacco control journey after the FCTC: lessons for tobacco control advocacy in low-income and middle-income countries.

Catherine O Egbe1,2, Stella A Bialous1,3, Stanton Glantz1,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nigeria ratified the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in 2005. Tobacco control advocates in Nigeria achieved some success in countering tobacco industry interference to implement the FCTC.
METHODS: We triangulated interviews with key informants from local and international organisations who worked in Nigeria with documentation of the legislative process and Nigerian newspaper articles. Data were analysed and interpreted using the Policy Dystopia Model and WHO categories of tobacco industry interference that had been developed mostly based on experience in high-income countries.
RESULTS: As in high-income countries, the tobacco industry continued to oppose tobacco control policies after Nigeria ratified the FCTC, including weakening Nigeria's 2015 National Tobacco Control Act. Both tobacco control advocates and industry used discursive (argument-based) and instrumental (activity-based) strategies. The industry argued self-regulation and the economic importance of tobacco. They exploited legislative procedures, used front groups and third parties to push for pro-industry changes. Advocates, with help from international organisations, mobilised prominent Nigerians and the public. Advocates pre-empted and countered the industry through traditional and social media, monitoring and exposing tobacco industry activities, and by actively engaging lawmakers and citizens during the legislative process.
CONCLUSION: The Policy Dystopia Model and WHO categories of industry interference provide a helpful framework for understanding tobacco control debates in low/middle-income countries (LMICs) as in high-income countries. One difference in LMIC is the important role of international tobacco control advocates in supporting national tobacco control advocates. This partnership is important in pushing for FCTC-compliant legislation and countering industry activities in LMIC. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advocacy; global health; low/middle income country; public policy; tobacco industry

Year:  2018        PMID: 30045974      PMCID: PMC6347549          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  23 in total

Review 1.  WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: development of an evidence based global public health treaty.

Authors:  Kenji Shibuya; Christina Ciecierski; Emmanuel Guindon; Douglas W Bettcher; David B Evans; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-19

Review 2.  The vector of the tobacco epidemic: tobacco industry practices in low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Sungkyu Lee; Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Strong advocacy led to successful implementation of smokefree Mexico City.

Authors:  Eric Crosbie; Ernesto M Sebrié; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-11-07       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  FCTC followed by accelerated implementation of tobacco advertising bans.

Authors:  Heikki Hiilamo; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Implementation in Nigeria: Lessons for Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Catherine O Egbe; Stella A Bialous; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Implementation of effective cigarette health warning labels among low and middle income countries: state capacity, path-dependency and tobacco industry activity.

Authors:  Heikki Hiilamo; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Civil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

Authors:  H M Mamudu; S A Glantz
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2009

8.  Success counteracting tobacco company interference in Thailand: an example of FCTC implementation for low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Naowarut Charoenca; Jeremiah Mock; Nipapun Kungskulniti; Sunida Preechawong; Nicholas Kojetin; Stephen L Hamann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  The Policy Dystopia Model: An Interpretive Analysis of Tobacco Industry Political Activity.

Authors:  Selda Ulucanlar; Gary J Fooks; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Avoiding "A Massive Spin-Off Effect in West Africa and Beyond": The Tobacco Industry Stymies Tobacco Control in Nigeria.

Authors:  Catherine O Egbe; Stella A Bialous; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.244

View more
  6 in total

1.  Exceeding WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Obligations: Nepal Overcoming Tobacco Industry Interference to Enact a Comprehensive Tobacco Control Policy.

Authors:  Dharma N Bhatta; Stella Bialous; Eric Crosbie; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Developing more detailed taxonomies of tobacco industry political activity in low-income and middle-income countries: qualitative evidence from eight countries.

Authors:  Britta Katharina Matthes; Kathrin Lauber; Mateusz Zatoński; Lindsay Robertson; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-03

3.  Global Implementation of Tobacco Demand Reduction Measures Specified in Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

Authors:  Heikki Hiilamo; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Securing Smokefree Laws Covering Casinos and Bars in Louisiana via Messaging, Continuous Campaigning and Health Coalitions.

Authors:  Tanner D Wakefield; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews.

Authors:  Britta Katharina Matthes; Lindsay Robertson; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Understanding how unhealthy food companies influence advertising restrictions.

Authors:  Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 11.069

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.