Literature DB >> 30045591

Prevalence of Recurrent Herniation Following Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Meta-Analysis.

Si Yin1, Heng Du1, Weizhou Yang1, Chungguang Duan1, Chaoshuai Feng1, Huiren Tao1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is a minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) with a smaller incision, decreased damage to soft tissues, faster recovery, and fewer postoperative complications. However, the exactly epidemiological prevalence of recurrent herniation after PELD remains unclear.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the epidemiological prevalence of recurrent herniation in patients following PELD and to analyze the potentially related risk factors. STUDY
DESIGN: Meta-analysis and systematic review of prospective and retrospective studies.
METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials that mentioned the incidence of recurrent herniation after PELD. The overall prevalence estimate was calculated by an appropriate meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were also performed in our study, respectively.
RESULTS: Our results showed the overall prevalence of recurrent herniation after PELD was 3.6% (95% CI 3.0-4.3%). The prevalence estimates after percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) and percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) were 4.2% and 3.4%, respectively. Individuals with older age (>/= 50 years) and higher BMI (>/= 25) had increased recurrence rates after PELD than those with younger age (4.3% vs. 2.7%) and normal body mass index (BMI) (4.8% vs. 1.5%). The prevalence was significantly higher at upper discs (5.4%) than that at L4-5 (2.7%) and L5-S1 (3.1%) level. The incidence of recurrent herniation at lateral disc was 4.7%, and the recurrence rate of migrated herniation was 3.8%. In most cases, the recurrent herniation occurred within 6 months postoperatively (accounting for 61.7%). LIMITATIONS: A majority of the included articles were relatively low quality retrospective studies with significant heterogeneity among them. Furthermore, owing to the paucity of data focused on recurrence, many potentially predictive factors related to subgroup analyses could not be conducted, which might have influenced the accuracy and comprehensiveness of our meta-analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: PELD is associated with a certain rate of recurrence (3.6%), which usually occurred within 6 months postoperatively. Older age (>/= 50 years), obesity (BMI >/= 25), upper lumbar disc and central disc herniation might be independent risk factors for recurrence after PELD; however, different surgical approaches (PETD or PEID), lateral discs, migrated discs and foraminoplasty did not affect the incidence. These factors could be useful in preoperative evaluation, appropriate patient selection and informed consent before PELD. KEY WORDS: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, prevalence, recurrent herniation, meta-analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30045591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of Cost-Utility of Thoracic Interlaminar Epidural Injections.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Vidyasagar Pampati; Satya P Sanapati; Mahendra R Sanapati; Alan D Kaye; Joshua A Hirsch
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2020-01-30

2.  Radiological risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective matched case-control study.

Authors:  Hang Shi; Lei Zhu; Zan-Li Jiang; Xiao-Tao Wu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Incidence of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A narrative review.

Authors:  Gonzalo Mariscal; Elena Torres; Carlos Barrios
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-06-13

4.  Earlier or heavier spinal loading is more likely to lead to recurrent lumbar disc herniation after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Kai Chen; Qiushui Lin; Yuegang Ma; Hao Huang; Chuanfeng Wang; Ping Zhou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 2.677

5.  Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Young Il Won; Woon Tak Yuh; Shin Won Kwon; Chi Heon Kim; Seung Heon Yang; Kyoung-Tae Kim; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

6.  Revision Surgery after Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy Compared with Primary Open Surgery for Symptomatic Lumbar Degenerative Disease.

Authors:  Jin-Qian Liang; Chong Chen; Hong Zhao
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 2.071

7.  [Percutaneous Lumbar Endoscopic Discectomy: Presentation of 60 Cases Intervened in Argentina with Awake Patients].

Authors:  Guillermo Frucella; Daniel Maldonado
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-08-02

8.  Effect of time to first ambulation on recurrence after PELD.

Authors:  Fengwei Qin; Zhaofei Zhang; Caixia Zhang; Yonghui Feng; Sineng Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 9.  Effects of adhesion barrier gel on functional outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation surgery; A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Authors:  Seyedmorteza Hosseini; Amin Niakan; Maryam Dehghankhalili; Reza Dehdab; Shima Shahjouei; Yasamin Rekabdar; Elaheh Shaghaghian; Alireza Shaghaghian; Fariborz Ghaffarpasand
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-06-11

10.  Risk Factors for Recurrent L5-S1 Disc Herniation After Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Chaojie Yu; Xinli Zhan; Chong Liu; Shian Liao; Jinming Xu; Tuo Liang; Zide Zhang; Jiarui Chen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.