Literature DB >> 30044691

Cycling Through Migraine Preventive Treatments: Implications for All-Cause Total Direct Costs and Disease-Specific Costs.

Janet H Ford1, Krista Schroeder1, Allen W Nyhuis1, Shonda A Foster1, Sheena K Aurora1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a common and disabling neurological disease associated with substantial economic burden. Among patients with migraine, it is unknown if cost differences exist when preventive migraine medication (PMM) switches occur.
OBJECTIVE: To understand the cost burden and health care resource utilization of patients who discontinue or cycle through 1 (PMM1), 2 (PMM2), or ≥ 3 (PMM3) unique PMM drug classes over a 12-month period versus patients who adhere persistently to their initial PMM class.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study used the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan databases to identify adult patients with migraine initiating their first PMM class (antidepressants, antiepileptics, beta blockers, or neurotoxins) from 2011-2013 (index date = first PMM claim). Patients were required to have ≥ 2 outpatient (1 if inpatient) migraine diagnosis codes (ICD-9-CM 346.xx) from 1 year pre-index to 1 year post-index with ≥ 1 code occurring pre-index. Inclusion criteria also required 12 months of pre- and post-index continuous medical and prescription enrollment. All-cause and migraine-specific total direct costs (outpatient, inpatient, emergency department, and prescriptions), based on the 2014 Consumer Price Index, were estimated for each PMM versus a persistent subgroup during the 12-month post-index period. Propensity score bin bootstrapping, controlling for patient baseline characteristics, was used to adjust separate cost comparisons between each PMM subgroup and the persistent subgroup; bootstrap simulations yielded propensity score-adjusted P values.
RESULTS: The study population included 55,402 patients who received a PMM. The study population was mainly female (85%) with a mean age of 39.2 years and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0.31. Antiepileptics were the most common drug class chosen at index across all subgroups; however, lower use of antiepileptics was observed in PMM2 and PMM3 subgroups, which were more likely to be prescribed either antidepressants or beta blockers at index. Mean all-cause total direct costs, including prescription costs, were significantly higher in PMM2 ($13,429) and PMM3 ($18,394) subgroups versus the persistent subgroup ($11,941; each adjusted pairwise comparison, P < 0.001). Mean migraine-specific total direct costs were significantly lower for the persistent subgroup ($2,420) versus PMM2 and PMM3 subgroups and escalated with increasing numbers of drug class discontinuations or switches, from a mean of $2,997 to $5,004 (both adjusted pairwise comparisons, P < 0.001). Subgroup differences in all-cause and migraine-specific direct costs were primarily due to variations in outpatient and emergency department services.
CONCLUSIONS: All-cause total direct costs rose with increasing number of PMM switches over the 12-month post-index period, and were significantly higher than in the persistent subgroup, with the exception of PMM1. Additional analyses indicated that the lack of increase between PMM-persistent and PMM1 costs was due to higher pharmacy costs that were likely related to continuous use of medication in the PMM-persistent subgroup. These data suggest an increased cost burden among patients with migraine who cycle through ≥ 2 PMMs versus those who continue to receive their initial medication class. DISCLOSURES: Eli Lilly and Company was the sole sponsor and funder for this study and was responsible for the study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of data, and decision to publish the findings. All authors are employees and minor stockholders of Eli Lilly and Company. Nyhuis was employed by Eli Lilly and Company at the time of this study. The findings of this study were presented in part at the 18th Congress of the International Headache Society; September 7-10, 2017; Vancouver, Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30044691     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.18058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm


  7 in total

1.  Real-World Trends in Characteristics of Patients with Migraine Newly Initiated on Erenumab in the USA: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Juanzhi Fang; Stephanie Korrer; Jonathan C Johnson; Mark A Cheadle; Roshani Shah; Matias L Ferraris; Cristina Lopez-Lopez
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Health Care Utilization and Costs in Patients With Migraine Who Have Failed Previous Preventive Treatments.

Authors:  Lawrence Newman; Pamela Vo; Lujia Zhou; Cristina Lopez Lopez; Andy Cheadle; Melvin Olson; Juanzhi Fang
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-06

3.  Positive response to galcanezumab following treatment failure to onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with migraine: post hoc analyses of three randomized double-blind studies.

Authors:  J Ailani; E Pearlman; Q Zhang; A J Nagy; K Schuh; S K Aurora
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 6.089

4.  Unveiling the comparative efficacy and tolerability of comprehensive treatments for migraine: A protocol of systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Boru Jin; Huayan Liu; Lei Qiao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Analysis of treatment cost and persistence among migraineurs: A two-year retrospective cohort study in Pakistan.

Authors:  Kamran Khan; Mudassar Iqbal Arain; Muhammad Arif Asghar; Ahad Abdul Rehman; Muhammad Ali Ghoto; Abdullah Dayo; Muhammad Suleman Imtiaz; Mohsin Hamied Rana; Muhammad Asif Asghar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Rapid Onset of Effect of Galcanezumab for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine: Analysis of the EVOLVE Studies.

Authors:  Holland C Detke; Brian A Millen; Qi Zhang; Karen Samaan; Jessica Ailani; David W Dodick; Sheena K Aurora
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 5.887

7.  Comparison Of Methods To Estimate Disease-Related Cost And Healthcare Resource Utilization For Autoimmune Diseases In Administrative Claims Databases.

Authors:  Krista M Schroeder; Steve Gelwicks; April N Naegeli; Pamela C Heaton
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2019-11-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.