Literature DB >> 33530202

Unveiling the comparative efficacy and tolerability of comprehensive treatments for migraine: A protocol of systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Boru Jin1, Huayan Liu1, Lei Qiao2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a chronic paroxysmal incapacitating neurological disorder, which endangers the health of human worldwide ranking as the third most prevalent medical condition. There are no comprehensive estimates of treatments for migraine. We will conduct this systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to synthesis quantitative and comparative evidence on the efficacy and tolerability of all the known pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for migraine.
METHOD: We will perform the systematic electronic search of the literature utilizing MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL), and PsycINFO. We will only include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of high quality which appraise the efficacy or safety of any potential pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions in the treatment of patients with migraine. The traditional pairwise meta-analyses will be performed to anticipate the heterogeneities and publication bias and the NMA will be conducted within a Bayesian hierarchical model framework to obtain estimates for all valuable treatments for migraine. The entire heterogeneity will be quantified by Q statistic and I2 index. Other analyses included sensitivity analyses, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses will also be conducted. The whole process will be conducted using in R-3.6.0 software.
RESULTS: This study will obtain the efficacy and tolerability of all potential treatments for migraine, aiming at providing consolidated evidence to help make the best choice of interventions. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. DISCUSSION: This Bayesian network meta-analysis may be the first attempt to quantitatively synthesize the efficacy and tolerability of all potential treatments for migraine. And this method can ensure us to fully utilize both the direct and indirect evidence as well as gain the comparative estimates displayed in the derived hierarchies. Besides, we have registered this protocol on the international prospective register of systematic review (PROSPERO) (CRD42020157278).
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33530202      PMCID: PMC7850759          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


  44 in total

1.  Chinese herbal medicine for headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yi-Hua Shi; Yong Wang; Huan Fu; Zhen Xu; Hua Zeng; Guo-Qing Zheng
Journal:  Phytomedicine       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 5.340

2.  Statistical Primer: heterogeneity, random- or fixed-effects model analyses?

Authors:  Fabio Barili; Alessandro Parolari; Pieter A Kappetein; Nick Freemantle
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-09-01

3.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias.

Authors:  C B Begg; M Mazumdar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Manual Therapy and Quality of Life in People with Headache: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Luca Falsiroli Maistrello; Marco Rafanelli; Andrea Turolla
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2019-08-10

Review 5.  Sex differences in the epidemiology, clinical features, and pathophysiology of migraine.

Authors:  Kjersti Grøtta Vetvik; E Anne MacGregor
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 44.182

6.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.

Authors:  Larissa Shamseer; David Moher; Mike Clarke; Davina Ghersi; Alessandro Liberati; Mark Petticrew; Paul Shekelle; Lesley A Stewart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-01-02

7.  Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antiepileptic drugs for classical trigeminal neuralgia: a Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Zongshi Qin; Shang Xie; Zhi Mao; Yan Liu; Jiani Wu; Toshi A Furukawa; Joey S W Kwong; Jinhui Tian; Zhishun Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders during 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2017-09-17       Impact factor: 44.182

9.  Beta-blockers for the prevention of headache in adults, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jackson; Akira Kuriyama; Yachiyo Kuwatsuka; Sarah Nickoloff; Derek Storch; Wilkins Jackson; Zhi-Jiang Zhang; Yasuaki Hayashino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Network Meta-Analysis of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists for the Acute Treatment of Migraine.

Authors:  Fang Xu; Wenjun Sun
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 5.810

View more
  1 in total

1.  Observing time effect of SSRIs on suicide risk and suicide-related behaviour: a network meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Qing-Hua Chen; Yu-Ling Li; Yi-Ru Hu; Wan-Yuan Liang; Bin Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.