| Literature DB >> 30043690 |
Andrew W Kuhn1, Scott L Zuckerman1,2, Gary S Solomon1,2, Ira R Casson3, David C Viano4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Structural brain changes, potentially resulting from repetitive brain trauma (RBT), have been correlated with neurocognitive decline and increased symptom reporting in retired athletes. HYPOTHESIS: In a cohort of retired National Football League (NFL) players, the relationships between 3 neuroimaging parameters, neuropsychological testing, and symptom scores will be significantly correlated. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: National Football League; chronic impairment; cognitive function; neuroimaging; neuropsychological testing; neuroradiology; sport-related concussion
Year: 2016 PMID: 30043690 PMCID: PMC5315257 DOI: 10.1177/1941738116674006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sports Health ISSN: 1941-0921 Impact factor: 3.843
Demographic characteristics of 45 retired National Football League (NFL) players[ ]
| Characteristic | Mean (±SD) or n (%) |
|---|---|
| Age, y | 46.7 (±9.1) |
| Height, in | 75.0 (±1.8) |
| Weight, lb | 254.9 (±45.9) |
| Body mass index | 31.4 (±4.8) |
| Learning disability | 10 (22.2) |
| NFL position | |
| Quarterback | 0 (0) |
| Runningback/fullback | 2 (4) |
| Wide receiver | 2 (4) |
| Tight end | 1 (2) |
| Offensive lineman | 9 (20) |
| Defensive lineman | 9 (20) |
| Safety/cornerback | 9 (18) |
| Linebacker | 14 (32) |
| Football experience, y | |
| Pre–high school | 2.5 (±2.3) |
| High school and college | 7.7 (±1.0) |
| NFL training camp | 6.8 (±3.2) |
| Played other contact sports | 5 (11) |
| Prior sport-related concussion | |
| Football | 9.0 (±6.9) |
| NFL | 6.9 (±6.2) |
| Prior sport-related “dings” | |
| Football | 14.9 (±7.9) |
| NFL | 13.0 (±7.9) |
| Nonsport-related head injury | |
| Concussion | 0.2 (±0.4) |
| Other head injury | 0.1 (±0.3) |
| Alcohol or drug suspension | 0 (0) |
Reprinted with permission from Solomon et al.[60]
Structural brain imaging, neuropsychological testing, and depression and symptom scores in 45 retired National Football League players[ ]
| Outcome | Mean (±SD) or n (%) |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Cavum septum pellucidum | |
| Absent | 10 (22) |
| Small | 32 (71) |
| Large | 3 (7) |
| SWI microbleeds | 4 (9) |
| FA mean | 0.459 (±0.035) |
|
| |
| Brief visuospatial memory test—sum | 43.0 (±10.9) |
| Brief visuospatial memory test—delayed recall | 49.4 (±11.0) |
| California Verbal Learning Test—sum | 39.1 (±9.2) |
| California Verbal Learning Test—short delay free recall | 39.5 (±10.4) |
| California Verbal Learning Test—long delay free recall | 38.4 (±8.6) |
| Trails A | 51.1 (±10.8) |
| Trails B | 46.5 (±8.0) |
| Controlled Oral Word Association Test—FAS | 47.9 (±9.0) |
| Animals | 50.2 (±9.6) |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Digit Span | 47.7 (±8.9) |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Letter Numbering Sequence | 50.6 (±8.9) |
| Wechsler Test of Adult Reading—Intelligence Quotient | 98.6 (±12.3) |
| ImPACT verbal memory | 75.9 (±12.0) |
| ImPACT visual memory | 59.0 (±14.0) |
| ImPACT visual motor processing speed | 28.6 (±8.3) |
| ImPACT reaction time | 0.77 (±0.19) |
| ImPACT impulse control | 5.70 (±6.0) |
|
| |
| Beck Depressive Inventory–II | 9.71 (±9.6) |
| Mini-Mental State Examination | 28.5 (±1.3) |
| Patient Health Questionnaire | 26.5 (±19.9) |
| ImPACT Total Symptom Score | 20.0 (±21.3) |
FA, fractional anisotropy; ImPACT, Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing; SWI, susceptibility weighted image; Trails A and B, Trail Making Tests A and B.
Reprinted with permission from Solomon et al.[60]
Figure 1.Distribution of neuroimaging biomarkers of (a) cavum septum pellucidum, (b) fractional anisotropy, and (c) microbleeds in 45 retired National Football League players.
Overall correlations among structural brain imaging findings, neuropsychological testing performance, depressive and total symptom scores in retired National Football League athletes[ ]
| Structural Brain Imaging | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| SWI Microbleeds (n = 45) | FA Mean (n = 44) | Cavum Septum Pellucidum (n = 45) | |
| Neuropsychological testing | |||
| Brief visuospatial memory test sum | −0.077 (0.617) | 0.098 (0.528) | −0.043 (0.779) |
| Brief visuospatial memory test—delayed recall | −0.123 (0.419) | 0.011 (0.941) | 0.068 (0.657) |
| California Verbal Learning Test—sum | −0.236 (0.119) | −0.250 (0.101) | −0.172 (0.259) |
| California Verbal Learning Test—short delay free recall | −0.128 (0.403) | −0.178 (0.247) | −0.176 (0.247) |
| California Verbal Learning Test—long delay free recall | −0.113 (0.458) | −0.212 (0.168) | −0.154 (0.312) |
| Trails A | 0.035 (0.822) | 0.043 (0.780) | 0.042 (0.783) |
| Trails B | −0.021 (0.891) | 0.053 (0.732) | −0.077 (0.617) |
| Controlled Oral Word Association Test—FAS | 0.247 (0.102) | 0.146 (0.343) | 0.125 (0.412) |
| Animals | −0.048 (0.755) | 0.039 (0.803) | 0.089 (0.561) |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Digit Span | 0.020 (0.896) | 0.138 (0.371) | 0.196 (0.196) |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Letter Numbering Sequence | −0.046 (0.762) | 0.071 (0.647) | −0.110 (0.471) |
| Wechsler Test of Adult Reading—Intelligence Quotient | 0.027 (0.860) | −0.003 (0.982) | −0.106 (0.487) |
| ImPACT verbal memory | −0.235 (0.120) | −0.135 (0.381) | −0.108 (0.482) |
| ImPACT visual memory | 0.045 (0.768) | 0.033 (0.831) | −0.101 (0.508) |
| ImPACT visual motor processing speed | 0.063 (0.679) | 0.151 (0.329) | 0.011 (0.943) |
| ImPACT reaction time | 0.093 (0.542) | −0.014 (0.930) | −0.082 (0.593) |
| ImPACT impulse control | 0.024 (0.875) | −0.014 (0.926) | −0.109 (0.475) |
| Depression and symptom scales | |||
| Beck Depressive Inventory–II | 0.009 (0.953) | 0.048 (0.757) | 0.103 (0.502) |
| Mini-Mental State Examination | −0.257 (0.089) | −0.218 (0.156) | −0.132 (0.388) |
| Patient Health Questionnaire | 0.175 (0.251) | 0.231 (0.131) | 0.173 (0.256) |
| ImPACT Total Symptom Score | 0.106 (0.490) | 0.028 (0.855) | 0.056 (0.715) |
FA, fractional anisotropy; ImPACT, Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing; SWI, susceptibility weighted image; Trails A and B, Trail Making Tests A and B.
Data are presented as r/r (P value).
Figure 2.Frequency of absolute correlative r values and Cohen effect sizes among the 3 neuroimaging biomarkers and 63 neuropsychological testing and symptom endorsement outcome measures analyzed.