Literature DB >> 30042789

Clinical and Neuro-ophthalmologic Predictors of Visual Outcome in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Aastha Takkar1, Manoj Kumar Goyal1, Reema Bansal2, Vivek Lal1.   

Abstract

Despite the potential of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) to cause visual morbidity, limited literature is available focussing on predictors of visual outcome in IIH. This study was planned to assess visual morbidity in patients of IIH in terms of clinical and neuro-ophthalmo- logical parameters. In this prospective study of 40 patients of IIH, neuro-ophthalmological parameters were noted in the form of visual acuity, visual field, contrast sensitivity, Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer thickness, and visual evoked potential. Visual outcome was defined in using specific criteria. Final visual outcome of patients was compared with clinical and neuro-ophthalmologic para- meters to determine any correlation. The most common presenting clinical symptoms were headache (85%) and Transient visual obscurations (TVOs) (52.5%). In univariate analysis severity of visual loss, Cerebro Spinal Fluid (CSF) pressures and abnormal Visual evoked potential (VEP) were associated with worse visual outcome or need of aggressive management. When adjusted for severity of visual loss no independent clinical/neuroophthalmic predictor could be established. High CSF opening pressure, worsening vision/papilledema, greater Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) thickness and abnormal VEPs may be some of the alarming signs for physicians, but none of these parameters can be used as an independent predictor for visual outcome in isolation. Visual loss at presentation is probably the most important predictor of the final visual outcome in these patients. This may also suggest that patients presenting in an advanced disease course (with worse visual status) fair badly despite best medical/surgical management. Early diagnosis and prompt management is the cornerstone of management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension; predictors; visual outcome

Year:  2018        PMID: 30042789      PMCID: PMC6056212          DOI: 10.1080/01658107.2017.1400570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroophthalmology        ISSN: 0165-8107


  15 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Deborah I Friedman; Daniel M Jacobson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-11-26       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE WITHOUT BRAIN TUMOR: DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT.

Authors:  W E Dandy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1937-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The idiopathic intracranial hypertension treatment trial: clinical profile at baseline.

Authors:  Michael Wall; Mark J Kupersmith; Karl D Kieburtz; James J Corbett; Steven E Feldon; Deborah I Friedman; David M Katz; John L Keltner; Eleanor B Schron; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 18.302

4.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: relation between obesity and visual outcomes.

Authors:  Aimee J Szewka; Beau B Bruce; Nancy J Newman; Valérie Biousse
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Whence pseudotumor cerebri?

Authors:  J L Smith
Journal:  J Clin Neuroophthalmol       Date:  1985-03

6.  Association of MRI findings and visual outcome in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Amit M Saindane; Beau B Bruce; Bryan D Riggeal; Nancy J Newman; Valérie Biousse
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Factors affecting visual loss and visual recovery in patients with pseudotumor cerebri syndrome.

Authors:  Clara L Afonso; Aley Talans; Mário Luiz Ribeiro Monteiro
Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.872

8.  Revised diagnostic criteria for the pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in adults and children.

Authors:  Deborah I Friedman; Grant T Liu; Kathleen B Digre
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Risk factors for poor visual outcome in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Michael Wall; Julie Falardeau; William A Fletcher; Robert J Granadier; Byron L Lam; Reid A Longmuir; Anil D Patel; Beau B Bruce; Hua He; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  The incidence of pseudotumor cerebri. Population studies in Iowa and Louisiana.

Authors:  F J Durcan; J J Corbett; M Wall
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1988-08
View more
  8 in total

1.  Safety and efficacy comparison between OACs plus single antiplatelet and dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with cerebral venous sinus stenosis poststenting.

Authors:  Chaobo Bai; Zhiying Chen; Xiaoqin Wu; Roxanne Ilagan; Yuchuan Ding; Xunming Ji; Ran Meng
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension- The Eyes and Beyond.

Authors:  Sucharita Ray; Aastha Takkar; Vivek Lal
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 1.714

3.  Accuracy of a Deep Learning System for Classification of Papilledema Severity on Ocular Fundus Photographs.

Authors:  Caroline Vasseneix; Raymond P Najjar; Xinxing Xu; Zhiqun Tang; Jing Liang Loo; Shweta Singhal; Sharon Tow; Leonard Milea; Daniel Shu Wei Ting; Yong Liu; Tien Y Wong; Nancy J Newman; Valerie Biousse; Dan Milea
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Course and Predictors of Visual Outcome of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  Raed Behbehani; Abdullah Ali; Ashraf Al-Moosa
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2021-10-13

5.  Extent of transverse sinus stenosis does not predict visual outcomes in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Arshia Eshtiaghi; Kirill Zaslavsky; Patrick Nicholson; Edward Margolin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.456

6.  Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Monster Within.

Authors:  Aastha Takkar; Vivek Lal
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 1.383

Review 7.  Clinical electrophysiology of the optic nerve and retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Oliver R Marmoy; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Change in contrast sensitivity and OCT parameters in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Obaidur Rehman; Parul Ichhpujani; Ekta Singla; Reetika Negi; Suresh Kumar
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.