Literature DB >> 26245929

Risk factors for poor visual outcome in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Michael Wall1, Julie Falardeau2, William A Fletcher2, Robert J Granadier2, Byron L Lam2, Reid A Longmuir2, Anil D Patel2, Beau B Bruce2, Hua He2, Michael P McDermott2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Determine potential risk factors for progressive visual field loss in the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial, a randomized placebo-controlled trial of acetazolamide in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and mild visual loss concurrently receiving a low sodium, weight reduction diet.
METHODS: Logistic regression and classification tree analyses were used to evaluate potential risk factors for protocol-defined treatment failure (>2 dB perimetric mean deviation [PMD] change in patients with baseline PMD -2 to -3.5 dB or >3 dB PMD change with baseline PMD -3.5 to -7 dB).
RESULTS: Seven participants (6 on diet plus placebo) met criteria for treatment failure. The odds ratio for patients with grades III to V papilledema vs those with grades I and II was 8.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-∞, p = 0.025). A 1-unit decrease in the number of letters correct on the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) chart at baseline was associated with an increase in the odds of treatment failure by a factor of 1.16 (95% CI 1.04-1.30, p = 0.005). Compared with female participants, the odds ratio for male participants was 26.21 (95% CI 1.61-433.00, p = 0.02). The odds of treatment failure were 10.59 times higher (95% CI 1.63-116.83, p = 0.010) for patients with >30 transient visual obscurations per month vs those with ≤30 per month.
CONCLUSIONS: Male patients, those with high-grade papilledema, and those with decreased visual acuity at baseline were more likely to experience treatment failure. All but one of these patients were treated with diet alone. These patients should be monitored closely and be considered for aggressive treatment of their idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
© 2015 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26245929      PMCID: PMC4553022          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  19 in total

1.  Whence pseudotumor cerebri?

Authors:  J L Smith
Journal:  J Clin Neuroophthalmol       Date:  1985-03

2.  Transient visual obscurations with elevated optic discs.

Authors:  A A Sadun; J N Currie; S Lessell
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Swelling of the optic nerve head: a staging scheme.

Authors:  L Frisén
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Visual field defects in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri).

Authors:  M Wall; W M Hart; R M Burde
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Visual loss in pseudotumor cerebri. Follow-up of 57 patients from five to 41 years and a profile of 14 patients with permanent severe visual loss.

Authors:  J J Corbett; P J Savino; H S Thompson; T Kansu; N J Schatz; L S Orr; D Hopson
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1982-08

6.  The idiopathic intracranial hypertension treatment trial: design considerations and methods.

Authors:  Deborah I Friedman; Michael P McDermott; Karl Kieburtz; Mark Kupersmith; Ann Stoutenburg; John L Keltner; Steven E Feldon; Eleanor Schron; James J Corbett; Michael Wall
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Factors affecting visual loss in benign intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  J C Orcutt; N G Page; M D Sanders
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Pseudotumor cerebri: clinical profile and visual outcome in 63 patients.

Authors:  J A Rush
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Pseudotumor cerebri in men.

Authors:  K B Digre; J J Corbett
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1988-08

10.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. A prospective study of 50 patients.

Authors:  M Wall; D George
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  [Idiopathic intracranial hypertension].

Authors:  J Bäuerle; K Egger; A Harloff
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  Update on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  Michael Wall
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.806

3.  The idiopathic intracranial hypertension prospective cohort study: evaluation of prognostic factors and outcomes.

Authors:  Mark Thaller; Victoria Homer; Yousef Hyder; Andreas Yiangou; Anthony Liczkowski; Anthony W Fong; Jasvir Virdee; Rachel Piccus; Marianne Roque; Susan P Mollan; Alexandra J Sinclair
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 6.682

4.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Update on diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Benjamin R Wakerley; Susan P Mollan; Alexandra J Sinclair
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.659

5.  Clinical and Neuro-ophthalmologic Predictors of Visual Outcome in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  Aastha Takkar; Manoj Kumar Goyal; Reema Bansal; Vivek Lal
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2018-01-09

6.  Accuracy of a Deep Learning System for Classification of Papilledema Severity on Ocular Fundus Photographs.

Authors:  Caroline Vasseneix; Raymond P Najjar; Xinxing Xu; Zhiqun Tang; Jing Liang Loo; Shweta Singhal; Sharon Tow; Leonard Milea; Daniel Shu Wei Ting; Yong Liu; Tien Y Wong; Nancy J Newman; Valerie Biousse; Dan Milea
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Course and Predictors of Visual Outcome of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  Raed Behbehani; Abdullah Ali; Ashraf Al-Moosa
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2021-10-13

Review 8.  Interventions for idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Rory J Piper; Aristotelis V Kalyvas; Adam M H Young; Mark A Hughes; Aimun A B Jamjoom; Ioannis P Fouyas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-07

9.  Extent of transverse sinus stenosis does not predict visual outcomes in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Arshia Eshtiaghi; Kirill Zaslavsky; Patrick Nicholson; Edward Margolin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.456

10.  Visual Field Outcomes for the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial (IIHTT).

Authors:  Michael Wall; Chris A Johnson; Kimberly E Cello; K D Zamba; Michael P McDermott; John L Keltner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.