Literature DB >> 30042743

bifA Regulates Biofilm Development of Pseudomonas putida MnB1 as a Primary Response to H2O2 and Mn2.

Yanjing Zheng1, Yumei Li1, Hongyan Long1, Xiaojuan Zhao1, Keke Jia1, Juan Li2, Leyong Wang3, Ruiyong Wang1, Xiancai Lu2, Dongmei Zhang1.   

Abstract

Pseudomonas putida (P. putida) MnB1 is a widely used model strain in environment science and technology for determining microbial manganese oxidation. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the growth and metabolism of P. putida MnB1 are influenced by various environmental factors. In this study, we investigated the effects of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and manganese (Mn2+) on proliferation, Mn2+ acquisition, anti-oxidative system, and biofilm formation of P. putida MnB1. The related orthologs of 4 genes, mco, mntABC, sod, and bifA, were amplified from P. putida GB1 and their involvement were assayed, respectively. We found that P. putida MnB1 degraded H2O2, and quickly recovered for proliferation, but its intracellular oxidative stress state was maintained, with rapid biofilm formation after H2O2 depletion. The data from mco, mntABC, sod and bifA expression levels by qRT-PCR, elucidated a sensitivity toward bifA-mediated biofilm formation, in contrary to intracellular anti-oxidative system under H2O2 exposure. Meanwhile, Mn2+ ion supply inhibited biofilm formation of P. putida MnB1. The expression pattern of these genes showed that Mn2+ ion supply likely functioned to modulate biofilm formation rather than only acting as nutrient substrate for P. putida MnB1. Furthermore, blockade of BifA activity by GTP increased the formation and development of biofilms during H2O2 exposure, while converse response to Mn2+ ion supply was evident. These distinct cellular responses to H2O2 and Mn2+ provide insights on the common mechanism by which environmental microorganisms may be protected from exogenous factors. We postulate that BifA-mediated biofilm formation but not intracellular anti-oxidative system may be a primary protective strategy adopted by P. putida MnB1. These findings will highlight the understanding of microbial adaptation mechanisms to distinct environmental stresses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  P. putida MnB1; anti-oxidative system; bifA; biofilm formation; environmental stress; mco; mntABC; sod

Year:  2018        PMID: 30042743      PMCID: PMC6048274          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

Environmental stresses, such as nutrient depletion, extreme temperature and pressure, high salinity, strong ultraviolet light, and radiation, commonly induce microbes to produce cellular oxidative stress with overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Teitzel and Parsek, 2003; Matallana-Surget et al., 2009; Chattopadhyay et al., 2011; Murata et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2013). Excessive ROS generation can injure proteins, DNAs and lipids, resulting in gene mutation and cell death (Cabiscol et al., 2000; Green and Paget, 2004; Lewis, 2008; Calabrese et al., 2011; Pan, 2011; Cap et al., 2012; Imlay, 2013; Chua et al., 2016). While low or moderate levels of ROS-induced physiological and biochemical changes are able to achieve an adaptation to the surrounding environment (Sies, 2017). Therefore, microorganisms have developed diverse mechanisms to respond to external ROS stimuli. For most microbial pathogens, the two primary mechanistic adaptations in response to ROS are excitation of anti-oxidative system (Apel and Hirt, 2004) and the formation of biofilms (Kubota et al., 2008). However, for non-pathogenic environmental microorganisms, the mechanistic basis for response to ROS (e.g., tolerance or scavenging) is less well understood. Microbes in natural environments play important roles in global geochemical cycling, biodegradation of contaminants, and biofouling in the maintenance and evolution of local and global environments (Falkowski et al., 2008; Borch et al., 2010). ROS production in microbes during pathological condition is transient and moderate, while their exposure to consequent adverse factors in environments, results in oxidative stress (Cabiscol et al., 2000; Green and Paget, 2004; Matallana-Surget et al., 2009; Chattopadhyay et al., 2011; Murata et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2013; Imlay, 2013). Of note, microbes acquire energy by uptake of organic matter and redox reaction that take place on the transition metal ions in environment, sometimes producing secondary minerals (Rajkumar and Freitas, 2008; Soldatova et al., 2017). These physiological adaptation strategies allow microbes to survive in changing environments. Manganese (Mn), as one of the most abundant transition metals in the earth’s crust, is encountered by microbes in the soil, water and atmosphere. In natural water, the concentration of Mn2+ ion ranges from 0.2 ∼ 3 mM (Humphris et al., 1996). Microbial Mn (II) oxidation is the major driving force in the biological formation of manganese oxide, controlling the Mn cycling in natural environments (Nealson et al., 1988; Handley and Lloyd, 2013). The direct oxidation and acquisition of Mn2+ are performed by manganese oxidase (MCO) (Brouwers et al., 1999, 2000; Francis and Tebo, 2001) and manganese transporter (Mnt) (Courville et al., 2006; Nevo and Nelson, 2006; Rees et al., 2009), respectively. In many microbes, Mn acts as a crucial trace nutrient for energy generation through Mn2+ oxidation (Cailliatte et al., 2010), which is influenced by diverse environmental factors, such as O2 levels, temperature, light, salinity and Mn2+ concentration (Hansel, 2017). Mn2+ in microbes also plays an important role in their adaptive response to intracellular and environmental condition changes (Kolenbrander et al., 1998; Loo et al., 2003; Papp-Wallace and Maguire, 2006; Juttukonda et al., 2016; Colomer-Winter et al., 2017; Qin et al., 2017), such as protections against oxidative damage (Latour, 2015) by functioning as a reducing reagent (Mahal et al., 2005), superoxide dismutase (SOD) mimic (Reboucas et al., 2008; Kelso et al., 2012) or SOD cofactor (Kim et al., 1999; Tseng et al., 2001). The uptake and utilization of Mn2+ by microbes favor adaptation to nutrient stresses (Cailliatte et al., 2010; Juttukonda et al., 2016) and defense against oxidative stresses (Kehl-Fie et al., 2013; Latour, 2015; Colomer-Winter et al., 2017). Modulation of Mnts balances Mn2+ availability, protects from the toxicity of excess Mn2+ (Qin et al., 2017), and affects microbial growth (Cailliatte et al., 2010), infection (Papp-Wallace and Maguire, 2006) and biofilm formation (Kolenbrander et al., 1998; Loo et al., 2003). Therefore, Mn oxidizing microbe is a good model for investigating the adaptive mechanisms when facing environmental stresses. Pseudomonas putida (P. putida) MnB1, a prototype strain of the widely distributed P. putida species, has been widely used as a model strain for studying microbial Mn (II) oxidation in geochemical processes (Caspi et al., 1998; Villalobos et al., 2003; Toner et al., 2005; Parker et al., 2014). Numerous studies have been focused on the adsorption capacity of heavy metals and the formation of biogenic manganese minerals by P. putida MnB1 or P. putida GB1 (highly homologous to P. putida MnB1), which have successfully contributed to the environmental restoration of water, soil, and sediments (Villalobos et al., 2005; Sasaki et al., 2008; Meng et al., 2009; Forrez et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2012). Even though P. putida species are known to survive diverse exogenous stress factors, including heavy metal pollutants, superoxide (Lee et al., 2006; Park et al., 2006; Chavarria et al., 2013), antibiotics (Yeom et al., 2010), and organic compounds (Raiger-Iustman and Ruiz, 2008; Fernandez et al., 2012; Tavita et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2014), how P. putida MnB1 survives environmental stresses is not fully understood (Manara et al., 2012; Banh et al., 2013; Nikel et al., 2013; Ray et al., 2013). It is known that P. putida biofilm formation correlates with adaptation and persistence in response to environmental stresses, in which cyclic diguanylate (c-di-GMP) signaling plays an essential role (Gjermansen et al., 2006; Matilla et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2017). c-di-GMP acts as a second messenger that modulates the planktonic to adhesive lifestyle switch, influencing virulence, infection and antibiotic resistance in pathogen (Romling et al., 2013). Generally, a rise in intracellular c-di-GMP promotes biofilm formation, while a decrease in c-di-GMP increases high exercise and dispersal (Wolfe and Visick, 2008; Borlee et al., 2010). Synthesis and hydrolysis of c-di-GMP are catalyzed by diguanylate cyclases (DGCs) and c-di-GMP-specific phosphodiesterases (PDEs), respectively. The role of c-di-GMP-specific PDE, BifA, in biofilm formation has been described in P. putida (Jimenez-Fernandez et al., 2015), P. aeruginosa (Kuchma et al., 2007), and P. syringae (Aragon et al., 2015). In these Pseudomonas species, bifA genes display a high degree of similarity and the proteins possess EAL domains that are essential for c-di-GMP-specific PDE activity. Carbon starvation is reported to induce biofilm collapse, which is directly related to BifA PDE activity of P. putida (Gjermansen et al., 2005; Lopez-Sanchez et al., 2013). ΔbifA mutants increase biofilm formation in Pseudomonas species, and meanwhile exhibit reduction of starvation-induced biofilm dispersal in P. putida KT2442 (Jimenez-Fernandez et al., 2015), flagella-mediated motility in P. aeruginosa (Kuchma et al., 2007), and motility and virulence in P. syringae (Aragon et al., 2015). These observations indicate that c-di-GMP-specific PDEs are modulated by various environmental and/or intracellular signals to affect the microbe function (Gjermansen et al., 2005; Fang et al., 2014). Several lines of evidence imply that the modulation of c-di-GMP-specific PDE closely interrelates with the cellular anti-oxidative system (Huang et al., 2013; Chua et al., 2016; Strempel et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017), and responds to the presence of Mn2+ ion (Bobrov et al., 2005; Schmidt et al., 2005; Tamayo et al., 2005; Miner and Kurtz, 2016). Exposure to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for more than 120 generations increases rough and small colony variants (RSCV) in pathogenic P. aeruginosa (Chua et al., 2016). The appearance of RSCV, considered as a pre-biofilm form, increases microbial susceptibility to exogenous H2O2, which is restored by antioxidant L-glutathione treatment (Chua et al., 2016). Furthermore, H2O2 exposure leads to mutation in the WspF gene (encoded a c-di-GMP-specific PDE) that increases cellular c-di-GMP concentrations (Chua et al., 2016). Deletion of the yjcC gene (encoded a c-di-GMP-specific PDE) in Klebsiella pneumoniae increases sensitivity to H2O2 stress and decreases survival rate (Huang et al., 2013). Furthermore, ROS over-production causes the overwhelming formation of biofilms in Klebsiella pneumoniae CG43 (Huang et al., 2013). The phytopathogen Xylella fastidiosa with a mutation in the oxidative stress regulatory protein OxyR, exhibits more sensitive to H2O2 exposure but defective in biofilm maturation, suggesting that ROS may be an environmental cue to stimulate biofilm formation during host invasion (Wang et al., 2017). Therefore, c-di-GMP-specific PDE-mediated biofilm formation and intracellular anti-oxidative system may be closely associated with H2O2 stress. Moreover, c-di-GMP-specific PDE responds to Mn2+ ion (Bobrov et al., 2005; Schmidt et al., 2005; Tamayo et al., 2005; Miner and Kurtz, 2016) with significant effect on biofilm formation in pathogenic Yersinia pestis (Bobrov et al., 2005), Vibrio cholera (Tamayo et al., 2005), Eschericia coli (Schmidt et al., 2005), as well as in various environmental microbes, e.g., Thermotoga maritima (Miner and Kurtz, 2016). In natural environments, microorganisms are commonly exposed to oxidative stresses (Cooper et al., 1988; Mopper and Zhou, 1990; Hakkinen et al., 2004; Kaur and Schoonen, 2017) in which a variety of substances (e.g., pyrite, manganese oxides, and pyrithione) spontaneously react with molecular oxygen to produce H2O2 (Borda et al., 2001; Schoonen et al., 2010; Kong et al., 2015), especially with the mediation of light (Mopper and Zhou, 1990; Zuo and Deng, 1999) and organic substances (Zuo and Hoigne, 1993). In this study, the effects of H2O2 and Mn2+ ion on growth, Mn2+ acquisition, anti-oxidative system and biofilm formation by P. putida MnB1 were assayed. A comparison of cellular response to H2O2 and Mn2+ ion in environmental microbes has the potential to provide insight into a universal mechanism to protect against exogenous stresses and adapt to changing environments.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strain

The P. putida MnB1 strain was provided by the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC). P. putida MnB1 was cultivated in LEP medium (0.50 g yeast powder, 0.50 g acid hydrolyzed casein, 1.00 g glucose, 222 mg CaCl2, 0.39 g MgSO4, 1 mg FeCl3, 2.38 g HEPES (N-2-hydroxyethlpiperazine-N′-2-ethanesulfonic acid) (pH 7.5) per liter, containing 1 mL trace element solution (10 mg/L CaSO4⋅5H2O, 44 mg/L ZnSO4⋅7H2O, 20 mg/L CoCl2⋅6H2O, and 13 mg/L Na2MoO4⋅2H2O) (Boogerd and Devrind, 1987). The cultures were performed in 250 mL glass flasks at 30°C with shaking at 120 r/min.

Cell Growth and Proliferation Monitoring

For measurement of cell growth, 25 mL cultures with a density of approximately 1 × 106 cells/mL were incubated in LEP medium containing MnCl2 (0, 40, 200, 1000, and 5000 μM) or H2O2 (0, 40, 200, and 1000 μM) and monitored. The cultures were incubated with shaking at 30°C. The absorbance was measured at 600 nm (OD600) every 3 h for up to 48 h.

H2O2 Scavenging Capacity

H2O2 concentrations remaining in cultures were assessed with a commercial H2O2 detection kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China). The detected maximum concentration of H2O2 in nature is 400 μM (Gunz and Hoffmann, 1990; Mopper and Zhou, 1990; Borda et al., 2001; Schoonen et al., 2010). Therefore, cells were incubated in LEP medium containing H2O2 (40, 200, and 1000 μM) for 24 h at 30°C with shaking. Cell cultures were harvested every 3 h and centrifuged (10,000 rpm, 30 s) and supernatants were collected. Following the protocol provided by the manufacturer, the absorbance at 560 nm was measured for detection of H2O2 concentration by the xylenol orange reaction. Inactivated P. putida MnB1 was employed as a control to verify bio-degradation of the microbes on exogenous H2O2. P. putida MnB1 was inactivated in a water bath at 80°C for 30 min. H2O2 (1000 μM) was incubated in LEP medium with alive cells, inactivated cells, or in the absence of cells at 30°C with shaking. The culture supernatants were collected at 3 and 6 h, respectively. The xylenol orange reaction was conducted in polystyrene, flat-bottom, 96-well microplates in 3 replicates.

Biofilm Observation and Qualification

Cell suspensions (1.5 mL) were inoculated in 6-well plates at a density of 1 × 106 cells/mL. Coverslips and rhodochrosite slices (0.5 × 0.5 × 0.1 cm) were placed on the bottom of the plates and incubated at 30°C without shaking. After cell adhesion for 6 and 12 h, H2O2 (200 μM) was added to the cultures and incubated for another 2 h. Then coverslips and rhodochrosite slices were taken out and rinsed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) for three times. Specimens were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, and 100%) for 15 min each after rinsing 3 times. Finally, the samples were frozen at −80°C for 2 h and vacuum dried for 48 h. The samples were coated with platinum in a JEOL JFC-1600 auto fine coater device. Microbes colonized on glass coverslips or rhodochrosite slices were observed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Zeiss Supra55, Germany) at the State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research in Nanjing University. Quantification of biofilm formation by P. putida MnB1 was conducted in polystyrene, flat-bottom, 96-well microplates (Thermo ScientificTM NuncTM MicroWellTM Cell-Culture Treated Microplates) with 5 replicates. A 100 μL (1 × 106 cells/mL) cell suspension was incubated in LEP medium containing H2O2 (0, 40, and 200 μM) or MnCl2 (0, 40, 200, 1000, and 5000 μM) at 30°C without shaking for 6 and 12 h, respectively. After supernatants were removed, the biofilms were rinsed three times with PBS and stained with 100 μL of 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet (CV) for 15 min (Sule et al., 2009). CV was removed and the biofilms were rinsed three times before air drying. 100 μL of acetic acid (33%) was added to the biofilms, followed by a 30 min-incubation at 37°C to resolve CV completely. The solution was diluted (1:10) before measuring OD590 with a Safire Microplate Reader (Tecan Group Ltd., Mannedorf, Switzerland) to quantify the amount of CV absorbed by the biofilms. The effect of H2O2 on biofilm formation after cell adhesion onto solid surfaces was investigated with a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM, Leica TCS SP8, Germany) at the State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology of Nanjing University. P. putida MnB1 cell cultures (1.5 mL) were inoculated into a 6-well plate at a density of 1 × 106 cells/mL. A coverslip was placed on the bottom of the plate and incubated at 30°C for 6 and 12 h without shaking. After adhesion, H2O2 (0, 40, and 200 μM) was added to the culture for another 2 h. Then coverslips were taken out and rinsed three times with sterile deionized water. The colonized cells were stained with 1.0 mL of PBS containing 3.0 μL of STYO9 (3.34 mM) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States) for 20 min and washed three times with sterile deionized water. The prepared coverslips were fixed onto glass slides, and observed with the excitation and emission wavelength of 480 and 500 nm, respectively. The number of fluorescently labeled cells on the glass coverslips was quantified.

Determination of Cellular Levels of ROS, SOD and Catalase Activity

For detection of catalase (CAT) activity in P. putida MnB1, 10 μL H2O2 (9.7 M) was added to a 10 μL cell suspension to observe bubble formation, in which H2O2 yielded H2O and O2, indicating the existence of CAT activity. Suspensions containing inactive cells (water bath at 80°C for 30 min), and cell culture after removing bacteria by 0.22 μm filtration were served as controls. Bubble formation was visualized by use of a Dissecting Microscope (Olympus SZ61 Stereo Microscope, Japan). Total ROS was assessed with 10 μM 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA, Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China). 0.5 mL of cell suspension was placed in a 12-well plate at a density of 1 × 107 cells/mL. Cell suspensions were incubated with LEP medium containing 200 μM H2O2 at 30°C without shaking for 3, 6, and 12 h. Following H2O2 treatment, the cells were harvested and incubated with DCFH-DA at 25°C for 30 min and then washed twice with PBS. The intensity of the fluorescent signal was analyzed with an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and monitoring the emission wavelength of 525 nm. Following the H2O2 treatment similar to that of the ROS detection, cell lysates were harvested by liquid nitrogen freeze-thaw (three times) in lysis buffer (Beyotime Biotech, Nanjing, China). The supernatants were obtained by centrifugation (12,000 rpm, 3 min) to determine SOD and CAT activity (Beyotime Biotechnology, Haimen, China) by the WST-8 and the colorimetric method, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, respectively. The total ROS level, CAT, and SOD activity were calibrated and protein concentrations determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Haimen, China).

Genomic DNA Extraction, Gene Amplification, and Alignment

The whole genomic DNA was isolated following the manufacturer’s instructions (BioTeke Corporation, Beijing, China). Cells in logarithmic phase (2 × 109 cells in 2 mL) were centrifuged (10,000 rpm, 30 s) and the supernatants were discarded. After repeating centrifugation, the cells were re-suspended in 200 μL of Lysis Buffer A. 5 μL of lysozyme (10 mg/mL, dissolved in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) was added, mixed, and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. After the addition of 200 μL of Lysis Buffer B, the samples were immediately mixed and then treated with protease K (20 μL, 20 mg/mL) at 70°C for 10 min. After isopropanol precipitation and adsorption with Colum AC, the pellets were rinsed with Liquid Wash Buffer and then re-suspended in Liquid Elution Buffer. The extracted genomic DNA was preserved at −20°C for gene amplification. Primers of the following gene orthologs – mco, mntABC, sod, and bifA were designed according to the GenBank whole genome of P. putida GB-1. The primers used for qRT-PCR were synthesized by SunShine Biotechnology (Nanjing, China) and listed in Table . The homology of gene and protein sequences (Table ) were performed by using the alignment search algorithms BLASTN and BLASTX[1] and compared to the encoded genes and proteins in P. putida KT2440 (NC_002947.4) and P. putida GB-1 (NC_010322.1). The primer sequences for qRT-PCR. The sequence similarity for the amplified PCR products by NCBI Blast.

RNA Extraction and Quantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) Analysis

Planktonic and colonized cells were collected from flask and 6-well plates, respectively. 1.0 mL of cell cultures (1 × 106 cells/mL) were seeded into 100 mL LEP medium and incubated at 30°C with 120 r/min shaking. After 3, 6, 12, and 24 h of cultivation, 2.0 mL cell cultures were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 30 s. The precipitated cells were suspended and rinsed with PBS for three times. These planktonic cells were used for qRT-PCR assay. Cell cultures (1 × 106 cells/mL in 1.5 mL) were seeded into 6-well plates and incubated at 30°C without shaking. After 3, 6, 12, and 24 h of cultivation, the upper culture medium and the floating cells were discarded, the adhesive cells were collected for qRT-PCR assay. Modulations of gene expression in the biofilm cells treated with exogenous H2O2 and MnCl2 were assayed. Cells were seeded into 6-well plates (1 × 106 cells/well) and incubated at 30°C without shaking to allow biofilm formation. After 6, 12, and 24 h of cultivation for adhesion, microbes were incubated with H2O2 (0, 200 μM) or MnCl2 (0, 200 μM) for another 2 h. The supernatants and the floating cells were removed to collect the adhesive cells for qRT-PCR assay. Total RNA was isolated with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (n = 5/group). cDNA was synthesized in real time (RT) buffer with MultiScribe reverse transcriptase, and dNTPs (Promega, Madison, WI, United States). Relative mRNA expression was normalized to 16S rRNA. qRT-PCR analysis of mRNA was performed using SYBR Green I dye (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, United States) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The reaction mixture was incubated in a CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) (30 s at 94°C followed by 45 cycles of 1 s at 94°C, 15 s at 55°C and 10 s at 72°C). Measurement of the fluorescence signal generated with SYBR Green I DNA dye was conducted at the annealing steps. Specificity of the amplification was confirmed by melting curve analysis. Data were collected and processed by CFX Manager Software (Bio-Rad), and expressed as a function of threshold cycle (Ct). The samples for qRT-PCR analysis were evaluated using a single predominant peak for quality control. The comparative Ct (2−ΔΔC) method was used for analysis of relative mRNA expression, normalized to 16S rRNA.

GTP Inhibition Evaluation

To investigate the role of BifA in P. putida MnB1, biofilm development was evaluated in the presence or absence of GTP, a potential inhibitor of c-di-GMP specific PDE (Ross et al., 1990; Barraud et al., 2009). Cells were seeded into 6-well plates (1 × 106 cells/well) with and without 250 μM GTP pre-treatment. After 6 h or 12 h incubation, exogenous H2O2 (40, 200, and 1000 μM) or MnCl2 (40, 200, and 1000 μM) were added into the cell culture, respectively. After further incubation for 2 h, biofilm formation was validated by CV staining.

Statistical Analysis

The data were presented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Bacterial Growth and H2O2 Bio-Degradation

As shown in Figure , 40 μM H2O2 had little effect on proliferation of P. putida MnB1. With 200 μM H2O2, there was a slight retardation in proliferation during the early logarithmic phase. When H2O2 was increased to 1000 μM, proliferation during the first 24 h was remarkably suppressed, although biomass was quickly increased and then exceeded that of other groups at 24 h. H2O2 at the 3 tested dosages was degraded completely within 6 h by P. putida MnB1 (Figure ), whereas little H2O2 was decomposed within 6 h by dead cells or in medium alone (Figure ). Changes in proliferation indicated a defensive mechanism in P. putida MnB1 in response to exogenous H2O2. Since there was no significant change in proliferation of P. putida MnB1 at 40 and 200 μM of H2O2, these working concentrations were employed for the following experiments. Exogenous H2O2 did not inhibit the growth of P. putida MnB1, but was bio-degraded quickly by P. putida MnB1. (A) Cells were incubated with 0, 40, 200, and 1000 μM H2O2, respectively. Growth of P. putida MnB1 was detected by measuring the absorbance at 600 nm (n = 3). (B) The concentration of H2O2 in culture with P. putida MnB1was assayed by the xylenol orange reaction (n = 3). (C) H2O2 concentration (initial concentration of 1000 μM) in LEP medium was assayed in the presence or absence of alive P. putida MnB1 or inactivated microbes, respectively. The supernatant of the cell culture was reacted with xylenol orange. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance, ∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. control group (0 μM H2O2).

Biofilm Formation With Exogenous H2O2

Biofilm formation was investigated by CV staining. Based on preliminary data, biofilm formation could be detected before 3 h and the absorbance at OD590 was maintained steadily between 12 and 48 h. Therefore, most of our experiments were conducted before 12 h, which is defined as the earlier development stage before maturation (O’Toole and Kolter, 1998). In this study, P. putida MnB1 was pre-cultivated in 96-well plates for 6 h or 12 h before exposure to H2O2. Biofilm biomass in the first 6 h was evidently promoted in the group with 200 μM H2O2 (Figure ). However, no distinct changes were observed at 12 h with 40 or 200 μM H2O2 exposure (Figure ). By integrating with the concentration changes of H2O2 within 6 h (Figure ), it was deduced that the promotion of H2O2 on the biofilm formation at earlier stage was pronounced. Effect of exogenous H2O2 on the biofilm formation by P. putida MnB1. Biofilm formation by P. putida MnB1 was quantified by CV staining with absorbance at 590 nm. Cells were incubated with H2O2 (0, 40, and 200 μM) for 6 h (A) and 12 h (B) (n = 6), respectively. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance, ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. control group (0 μM H2O2). STYO 9 staining also showed that 40 and 200 μM H2O2 increased biofilm formation at 6 and 12 h on glass coverslips (Figures ). When the adhesion substrate was rhodochrosite, FESEM images showed nanowire development in H2O2-treated group besides of biofilm formation (Figure ). Confocal and FESEM observation of P. putida MnB1 biofilm formation with exogenous H2O2. After 6 and 12 h cultivation for adhesion, cells were incubated with H2O2 (0, 40, and 200 μM) for another 2 h, respectively. (A) Confocal observation of biofilm formation onto glass coverslips by STYO 9 staining (scale bar, 25 μm). Fluorescently labeled biofilm cells on the glass coverslips after incubation for 6 h (B) and 12 h (C) were quantified (field of vision, 276.79 × 276.79 μm) (n = 3). (D) FESEM images of P. putida MnB1 adhered to rhodochrosite with and without 200 μM H2O2 incubation for 12 h (scale bar, 1 μm). Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance, ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. control group (0 μM H2O2).

Intracellular ROS Levels and Anti-oxidative System With Exogenous H2O2 Treatment

Pseudomonas putida MnB1 is a strict aerobe and possesses CAT. The activity of CAT was detected by oxygen bubble formation upon H2O2 addition. CAT activity was observed in alive P. putida MnB1, while no activity was detected in inactivated cells or culture medium after microbes removing (Figure ). Intracellular total ROS levels, when 200 μM H2O2 was added, were increased significantly at 3 h, and maintained until 12 h (Figure ). H2O2 exposure for 3, 6, and 12 h significantly increased CAT activity, but failed to change SOD activity (Figures ). Effect of H2O2 on total cellular ROS levels, CAT and SOD activity in P. putida MnB1. H2O2 (9.7 M) was added to cell suspension, and bubble formation was observed by Dissecting Microscope (scale bar, 1 mm) (A). The volume of four reactions were 20 μL, containing alive microbes (without H2O2), 10 μL cell culture after removing microbes and 10 μL H2O2, 10 μL inactivated bacteria with10 μL H2O2, and 10 μL alive microbes with 10 μL H2O2 (scale bar, 1 mm). Cellular total ROS levels were determined with 200 μM H2O2 incubation for 0, 3, 6, and 12 h (n = 4), respectively (B). Cellular activity of CAT (C) and SOD (D) was analyzed, respectively (n = 4). Total ROS levels, CAT and SOD activity were calibrated to protein concentration in each sample. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance, ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. control group (0 h incubation).

mntABC, sod, and bifA Gene Modulation in Planktonic and Colonized Cells

Sequence similarity in nucleic acid and protein for the amplified products mco, mntABC, sod, and bifA was investigated by NCBI Blast. Most of the PCR products shared at least 98% homology with that of P. putida KT2440 or P. putida GB-1 (Table ). The homology of each encoded protein predicted by NCBI Blast suggested the existence of conserved motifs. Differences in mRNA expression between planktonic and colonized cells were assayed by qRT-PCR. mco gene expression in the colonized cells was varied slightly at different stages relative to the planktonic cells (Figure ). No significant change in mco mRNA levels was detected during the stabilization and maturation of biofilms (Figure ). In contrast to the planktonic cells, mntABC mRNA levels were increased in colonized cells at 12 h (Figure ). However, mntABC gene expression was markedly decreased during biofilm maturation (Figure ). Expression of mco, mntABC, sod, and bifA gene between the planktonic and biofilm lifestyles as well as during biofilm development. mco (A), mntABC (B), sod (C), and bifA (D) mRNA levels in planktonic cells and colonized cells at 6, 12, and 24 h incubation were determined by qRT-PCR, respectively. (E) The cellular mRNA levels of mco, mntABC, sod and bifA during biofilm development in the colonized cells were determined by qRT-PCR. These expression levels were normalized to 16s rRNA (n = 4). Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance, ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. planktonic cell group. ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 vs. 6 h-biofilm formation group. There was no significant difference in the expression of sod gene between planktonic and colonized P. putida MnB1 cells (Figure ). But, sod mRNA levels were increased clearly when the biofilm was developed at 24 h (Figure ). Compared to planktonic cells, bifA gene expression in colonized cells was declined evidently, especially at 24 h (Figure ). bifA mRNA levels during the middle stage were lower than the earlier stage, but increased greatly at 24 h (Figure ).

bifA and sod Gene Modulation by Exogenous H2O2

The effects of H2O2 on sod gene expression were time-dependent. Compared to the control group, H2O2 significantly down-regulated the expression of sod gene in biofilm cells at 12 h, with no apparent effect at 3, 6, or 24 h (Figure ). H2O2 significantly repressed sod mRNA levels at 6 and 12 h biofilm development, but such a repression was restored when the biofilm was developed to 24 h (Figure ). The sod and bifA mRNA levels in biofilm cells as well as during biofilm development with exogenous H2O2. sod (A) and bifA (C) mRNA levels were detected by qRT-PCR analysis in colonized cells incubated with 200 μM H2O2 for 2 h after 3 h, 6, 12, and 24 h cultivation for adhesion, respectively. Relative gene expression levels of sod and bifA were normalized to 16s rRNA (n = 4), respectively. The cellular mRNA levels of sod (B) and bifA (D) during different stages of biofilm formation. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance, ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. control group (0 μM H2O2). #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, and ###P < 0.001 vs. 3 h-biofilm formation group. The sensitivity of bifA gene expression modulation in biofilm cells under H2O2 exposure was evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 h. H2O2 significantly reduced the expression of bifA gene at 3 and 6 h, which were consistent with H2O2-promoted biofilm formation at the initial stage (Figure ). But, the decrease in the bifA mRNA levels was restored at 12 h of biofilm development (Figures ), being consistent with the CV staining results in which the effect of H2O2 on biofilm formation was nearly disappeared at that stage (Figure ). bifA gene expression was dysregulated by H2O2 throughout biofilm development.

Bacterial Growth and Biofilm Formation With Exogenous Mn2+ Ion Supply

Concentrations of 40, 200, 1000, and 5000 μM MnCl2 were selected as working dosages. As shown in Figure , MnCl2 at all dosages had little effect on the proliferation of P. putida MnB1 within 12 h, but proliferation was promoted after the logarithmic growth period. Interestingly, 200 and 1000 μM MnCl2 were found to reduce biofilm formation significantly at 6 and 12 h (Figure ). Similar suppression effect was observed at 6 h with 5000 μM Mn2+ ion supply (Figure ). Effect of exogenous Mn2+ ion on the growth and biofilm formation by P. putida MnB1. (A) Microbial growth was detected by measuring the absorbance at 600 nm. P. putida MnB1 was incubated with 0, 40, 200, 1000, and 5000 μM Mn2+, respectively. Biofilm formation by P. putida MnB1 was quantified by CV staining with absorbance at 590 nm. Cells were incubated with Mn2+ (0, 40, 200, 1000, and 5000 μM) for 6 and 12 h (n = 6) (B). Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance, ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 vs. control group (0 μM MnCl2).

mco, mntABC, sod, and bifA Gene Modulation by Exogenous Supply of Mn2+ Ion

mco gene expression in the colonized cells was not sensitive to exogenous Mn2+ ion supply (Figure ). During biofilm development, the expression levels of mntABC in the colonized cells were remarkably up-regulated by 200 μM Mn2+ compared to planktonic cells (Figure ). Down-regulation of sod and up-regulation of bifA mRNA was also induced by 200 μM Mn2+ at 12 h (Figures ). Biofilm mntABC mRNA levels were decreased in the colonized cells at 24 h relative to 6 and 12 h (Figure ), indicating adaption to exogenous Mn2+ overload. Furthermore, sod mRNA levels were down-regulated, exactly similar to H2O2 exposure (Figure ). Additionally, bifA expression was increased at 12 h, but declined in biofilms at 24 h (Figure ) in the colonized cells exposed to 200 μM Mn2+. The mco, mntABC, sod, and bifA mRNA levels in biofilm cells as well as during biofilm development with exogenous Mn2+. mco (A), mntABC (B), sod (C), and bifA (D) mRNA levels in colonized cells incubated with 200 μM Mn2+ for 2 h after 6, 12, and 24 h cultivation for adhesion, were detected by qRT-PCR, respectively. The cellular mRNA levels of mntABC (E), sod (F), and bifA (G) at different stages of biofilm formation were detected by qRT-PCR, respectively. Relative gene expression levels of mco, mntABC, sod and bifA were normalized to 16s rRNA (n = 4), respectively. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance, ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. control group (0 μM MnCl2). ###P < 0.001 vs. 3 h-biofilm formation group.

Regulatory Effect of GTP on Biofilm Formation

bifA mRNA levels in P. putida MnB1 were down-regulated by H2O2 at 3 and 6 h (Figure ), while the opposite modulation was observed with MnCl2 incubation at 12 h (Figure ). GTP is an effective inhibitor of BifA that partially blocks BifA-mediated degradation of c-di-GMP, promoting biofilm formation (Barraud et al., 2009). At different Mn2+ concentrations, pre-incubation with 200 μM GTP significantly promoted biofilm formation at 6 h (Figure ), this promotion was further strengthened to nearly 3–5 fold at 12 h (Figure ). GTP also increased biofilm formation at 6 h with 40 and 1000 μM H2O2 (Figure ). But, the amplification effect of GTP on biofilm formation did not show demonstrable at 12 h with H2O2 exposure at 3 dosages (Figure ). Effect of GTP on biofilm formation by P. putida MnB1. Microbes were incubated with Mn2+ at 40, 200, and 1000 μM for 6 h (A) and 12 h (B) in the presence or absence of 250 μM GTP (n = 6), respectively. Microbes were incubated with H2O2 at 40, 200, and 1000 μM for 6 h (C) and 12 h (D) in the presence or absence of 250 μM GTP (n = 6), respectively. Biofilm formation of P. putida MnB1 was quantified by CV staining with absorbance at 590 nm. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance, ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. control group (0 μM GTP).

Discussion

In general, activation of anti-oxidative system (Kubota et al., 2008) and biofilm formation (Falkowski et al., 2008) are strategies utilized by pathogenic microorganisms to achieve stress tolerance. However, the mechanisms by which environmental microbes adapt to varying environments are not fully understood. In this study, the involvement of anti-oxidative system and c-di-GMP signaling in response to H2O2 and MnCl2 by P. putida MnB1 were investigated to elucidate the microbial adaptive mechanisms within natural environments.

Modulation of Anti-oxidative System in Response to Exogenous H2O2

In this study, no cytotoxic effect of H2O2 (40–1000 μM) on P. putida MnB1 proliferation was observed. However, at 1000 μM H2O2, proliferation was retarded in the first 24 h (Figure ). Rapid recovery from high H2O2 levels suggests an effective defense mechanism against exogenous H2O2. P. putida MnB1 could quickly degrade H2O2 and produce O2 bubbles (Figure ), suggesting H2O2 decomposition (Figures ) by CAT activity (An et al., 2011; Chiang et al., 2011). However, cellular oxidative stress was maintained until 12 h even though the H2O2 had been scavenged (Figures ), with increased ROS levels (Figure ). Meanwhile, CAT activity increased significantly until 12 h (Figure ) induced by H2O2 exposure for decomposition. This decomposition improves cell viability by reducing oxidative damage to DNA and RNA in Bifidobacterium longum (Zuo et al., 2014) and in several UV-sensitive bacteria, during intracellular oxidative stress (Santos et al., 2012). During this procedure, sod over-expression synergistically accelerates the decomposition of exogenous H2O2 catalyzed by CAT. Sod-regulated anti-oxidative mechanisms are commonly adaptive processes for microbial protection (Green and Paget, 2004; Imlay, 2013). Intracellular ROS is produced not only physiologically, but also in response to environmental stimuli, including lack of nutrients, heavy metals contamination and ultraviolet light (Cabiscol et al., 2000; Green and Paget, 2004; Matallana-Surget et al., 2009; Chattopadhyay et al., 2011; Murata et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2013; Imlay, 2013). Herein, no significant SOD activation (Figure ) or sod up-regulation was observed during biofilm formation of P. putida MnB1 with H2O2 exposure (Figure ). In the presence of H2O2, sod up-regulation relieves oxidative stress and allows microbial adaptation to environmental change (Green and Paget, 2004; Imlay, 2013). Therefore, the function of SOD involved anti-oxidative system in the resistance to H2O2 in P. putida MnB1 is not observably crucial.

Biofilm Formation in Response to Exogenous H2O2

In the present study, bifA gene expression was altered significantly when P. putida MnB1 cells were transformed from a planktonic to an adhesive lifestyle, as well as during the development of biofilms (Figure ). c-di-GMP specific PDEs modulate biofilm formation by decreasing cellular c-di-GMP levels as well as the sensitivity of microbes to environmental stresses (Osterberg et al., 2013; Fang et al., 2014; Aragon et al., 2015). It has been well disclosed that biofilm cells are more resistant to oxidative stress than planktonic cells in phytopathogenic microbes (Haque et al., 2017) and in animal pathogens (Hisert et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2013; Chua et al., 2016; Echeverz et al., 2017), which favors adaption and survival (Hisert et al., 2005; Dean et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2011; DePas et al., 2013; Chua et al., 2016). In this study, bifA gene expression (Figures ) and associated biofilm development (Figures , ) in P. putida MnB1 were clearly modulated by H2O2 exposure. Therefore, bifA-involved biofilm formation may be a defensive strategy utilized by P. putida MnB1 to survive H2O2 exposure-induced oxidative stress. Furthermore, the initiation of biofilm formation by P. putida MnB1 was more susceptible to H2O2 exposure than the mature biofilm (Figures ), being consistent with results obtained with P. putida KT2440 in response to ZnO nanoparticles (Ouyang et al., 2017). c-di-GMP-mediated adsorption is normally a key process for microbial leaching, in which biofilm formation is a defensive strategy against exogenous H2O2. 50 μM H2O2 promotes the adsorption of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans onto pyrite surfaces, enhancing the microbial oxidation of pyrite (Bellenberg et al., 2014). A significant increase in c-di-GMP content in colonized but not suspended cells has been reported in T. ferrooxidans (Ruiz et al., 2012). It has been indicated that bacteria develop nanowires to facilitate efficient electron transport within the biofilm of microbial fuel cells (Reguera et al., 2005; Gorby et al., 2006) and clinical pathogens (Wanger et al., 2013). The nanowires formed between cells and the interface between cells and solid-phase, may contribute to biofilm development (Reguera et al., 2006, 2007), biofilm stabilization (Reguera et al., 2005; Gorby et al., 2006), and pathogenicity (Wanger et al., 2013). Acyl-homoserine lactone is a second messenger to regulate biofilm formation and triggers nanowires occurrence in Aeromonas hydrophila (Castro et al., 2014). Nanowires are proved to increase biofilm stabilization and decrease sensitivity to antibiotic treatment (Wanger et al., 2013). The nanowires observed in this study may exhibit the role of biofilm formation in response of P. putida MnB1 to H2O2 exposure (Figure ). This is an interesting observation that provides a foundation for further investigation of BifA-mediated biofilm development. Therefore, biofilm formation by P. putida MnB1 may defend against unfavorable environmental condition and it may be more sensitive than the intracellular anti-oxidative system.

Mn2+ Ion Functions to Modulate Biofilm Formation

Effective acquisition of Mn2+ is normally involved in microbial resistance to oxidative stress and in bacterial pathogenesis (Papp-Wallace and Maguire, 2006; Coady et al., 2015). In this study, colonized cells exhibited an up-regulation of mntABC at mRNA level, suggesting the increased capacity for Mn2+ uptake (Figure ). Mn2+ overload increased mntABC gene expression as the biofilm was developed, demonstrating the adaptation potential (Figure ). Pathogens generally produce ROS for protection from the host immune response by increasing expression of Mn transporter proteins (Kehl-Fie et al., 2013; Park et al., 2017). Mutation or down-regulation of Mn transporters (MntABC, MntC, and MntH) significantly interferes with Mn2+ acquisition, increasing susceptibility to oxidative damage in Streptococcus (Wang et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2017), Staphylococcus aureus (Horsburgh et al., 2002; Coady et al., 2015), and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Tseng et al., 2001; Kehl-Fie et al., 2013). SOD is an important oxygen free radical scavenger, and possibly use Mn2+ as a cofactor to influence disease progression (Miao and St Clair, 2009). MCO is the major Mn oxidation enzyme to supply energy for Mn-oxidizing microbes (Brouwers et al., 1999, 2000; Francis and Tebo, 2001; Dick et al., 2008). In the present study, mco levels were barely changed with exogenous Mn2+ (Figure ) and H2O2 (data not shown), indicating that Mn2+ ion supply did not remarkably affect Mn2+ oxidation. Similar to H2O2, exogenous Mn2+ ion decreased the expressions of sod significantly (Figure ), but negatively related to biofilm formation (Figure ). Mn2+ ion function to scavenge ROS as a cofactor for SOD, the effective acquisition of which is found to be closely associated with the repair of oxidative damage (DePas et al., 2013), thus ensuring the effective growth of bacteria after phagocytosis (Tseng et al., 2001; Horsburgh et al., 2002; Kehl-Fie et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2014; Coady et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2017). As a type of trace nutrient, Mn2+ ion supply is an important factor affecting the biofilm formation (Shrout et al., 2006; Amaya-Gomez et al., 2015). In one respect, Mn2+ ion supply can promote the biofilm formation, which is restored by Mn2+ depletion in Streptococcus mutans, P. aeruginosa, and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Shrout et al., 2006; Amaya-Gomez et al., 2015). In contrast, Mn2+ ion can inhibit biofilm formation by some microbes (e.g., Yersinia pestis), possibly through the activation of c-di-GMP specific PDE HmsP, being strictly dependent on Mn2+ (Bobrov et al., 2005). Suppression of sod demonstrates a ROS scavenger of Mn2+, which serves as a substitution for the protective role of biofilm formation. Consistently, bifA up-regulation was accompanied by biofilm suppression in P. putida MnB1 (Figures , ). Mutation of an oxidative stress regulatory protein, OxyR, makes cells more sensitive to H2O2, resulting in defective biofilm maturation in Xylella fastidiosa. Thus, ROS may be a potential environmental stimulus for biofilm formation during host invasion by the bacterial phytopathogen, Xylella fastidiosa (Wang et al., 2017), further suggesting a potential relationship between anti-oxidative system and biofilm formation. Therefore, biofilm formation may be a universal mechanism for adaptation to environmental changes, and Mn2+ ion may decrease biofilm formation through regulation of bifA in P. putida MnB1.

BifA-Involved Biofilm Formation: A Sensitive Strategy for Protection

Mn2+ and H2O2 can be considered a trace nutrient supply and an environmental stress for P. putida MnB1, respectively. A close relationship was observed between regulation by Mn2+ and H2O2 and the formation and development of biofilms (Figures , , ). Moreover, GTP reversed the suppressive effect of Mn2+ on biofilm formation and greatly increased biofilm development for P. putida MnB1 (Figures ). GTP also accelerated biofilm formation at the initiation stage following the addition of H2O2 (Figures ). A bifA ortholog was amplified from the P. putida MnB1 genome, sharing 89% homology with the c-di-GMP PDE of P. putida GB1. Analysis with the alignment search algorithm BLASTX showed that the P. putida MnB1 BifA ortholog contain an EAL motif, which is crucial for c-di-GMP specific PDE activity. DGC synthesizes c-di-GMP in a GTP-dependent manner (Chen and Schaap, 2012) and c-di-GMP specific PDE is highly responsive to intracellular GTP availability (Christen et al., 2005; Barraud et al., 2009; An et al., 2010; Purcell et al., 2017). In response to diverse stresses on P. aeruginosa, c-di-GMP specific PDE mediates biofilm formation as well as the production and secretion of virulence factors that play a vital role in escape from host defense. In P. aeruginosa, biofilm dispersal and intracellular c-di-GMP specific PDE activity are significantly abrogated in the presence of GTP (Barraud et al., 2009). The gene rbdA encodes a bifunctional protein containing highly conserved DGC (GGDEF) and c-di-GMP specific PDE (EAL) motifs. GTP increases the c-di-GMP specific PDE activity of RbdA by allosterically modulating the GGDEF domain, promoting biofilm dispersal and production of virulence factors (rhamnolipids and exopolysaccharides) (An et al., 2010). Consistent with the results from P. aeruginosa (Barraud et al., 2009), we also manifested that GTP improved biofilm formation of P. putida MnB1, suggesting a key role for BifA in the formation of P. putida MnB1 biofilms as a sensitive defense to environmental stresses (Figure ). BifA regulated-biofilm formation is a primary mechanism to defend exogenous H2O2 exposure and closely correlates to cellular oxidative stress. Mn2+ ion and H2O2 represent 2 types of environmental factors, a trace nutrient substrate and an oxidative stress, respectively. Four genes that encode MCO, Mn2+ transporter, SOD and BifA were assayed for their expression during bacterial growth following exposure to the two environmental factors Mn2+ ion and H2O2 on the growth, Mn2+ acquisition, anti-oxidative system and biofilm formation in P. putida MnB1. Exogenous Mn2+ promoted Mn2+ uptake and acquisition. An increase in intracellular Mn2+ may act as nutrient substrate promoting microbial growth. Alternatively, Mn2+ may function as a cofactor for important enzymes, such as SOD, which scavenges ROS. Mn oxide, catalyzed by MCO is a barrier to protect from invasion, heavy metal and oxidative damage. Mn2+ may target Mn2+-responsive regulators to inhibit biofilm formation by BifA up-regulation. Decrements in intracellular anti-oxidative system and the inhibition of biofilm formation suggests that Mn2+ favors the microbial growth but suppresses biofilm development. Exogenous H2O2 triggers intracellular ROS over-production, but does not significantly affect the proliferation of P. putida MnB1. Bio-degradation of exogenous H2O2 and quick recovery of proliferative capacity at high H2O2 levels are due to CAT activity. In contrast to the activation of anti-oxidative system, promotion of the biofilms by down-regulation of BifA gene or the blockade of BifA activity suggests that biofilm formation may be a primary mechanism by which P. putida MnB1 defends unfavorable environmental factors. Therefore, BifA-mediated biofilm formation may be more sensitive than anti-oxidative system in response to Mn2+ ion and H2O2 in P. putida MnB1. The sensitivity of BifA-mediated biofilm formation may highlight its role in the adaption of microbes to environment stress. MCO, Manganese oxidase; MntABC, ABC-Type manganese transporter; SOD, Superoxide dismutase; CAT, Catalase; PDE, Phosphodiesterase; ROS, Reactive oxygen species. Deletion of the yjcCT gene of Klebsiella pneumoniae CG43 (a c-di-GMP specific PDE), promotes sensitivity to H2O2 treatment, with the reduction of survival rate. At the same time, ROS overproduction generally accompanies biofilm development (Huang et al., 2013). For the pathogenic bacteria P. aeruginosa, exogenous H2O2 promotes biofilm formation (Chua et al., 2016). Furthermore, mutation in WspF is induced by H2O2, with high intracellular c-di-GMP concentration and biofilm development (Chua et al., 2016). cdgR encodes a c-di-GMP specific PDE in Salmonella enteric var. Typhimurium, interference of which decreases resistance to H2O2 (Hisert et al., 2005). Therefore, bifA can respond to environmental factors by regulating biofilm formation, which is more sensitive than the intracellular anti-oxidative system in P. putida MnB1.

Conclusion

In this study, the effects of H2O2 and Mn2+ ion on P. putida MnB1 growth, Mn2+ ion acquisition, anti-oxidative system, and biofilm formation were investigated. Exogenous Mn2+ ion supply promoted the growth and Mn2+ uptake capacity of P. putida MnB1, but suppressed biofilm formation. Exogenous H2O2 was bio-degraded quickly in the presence of P. putida MnB1, with maintained cellular oxidative stress after H2O2 depletion. No significant SOD activation or sod gene up-regulation was detected in P. putida MnB1with H2O2 exposure. In contrast, bifA gene expression and subsequent biofilm formation were significantly modulated by Mn2+ ion and H2O2. The correlation between bifA-mediated biofilm formation and effect of Mn2+ ion and H2O2 was further manifested by blocking BifA activity in the presence of GTP. Sensitivity differences between intracellular anti-oxidative system and biofilm formation suggests that BifA-mediated biofilm formation may be a primary defense mechanism by P. putida MnB1 in response to environmental factors. These findings highlight the role of biofilm development in adaption of microbes to environment stresses.

Author Contributions

DZ conceived and designed the study. YZ conducted the experiments and prepared the manuscript. YL, HL, XZ, and KJ conducted the experiments. JL, LW, and RW analyzed and interpreted the data. DZ and XL wrote and revised the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Table 1

The primer sequences for qRT-PCR.

GenePrimer sequences (5′→3′)
mcoForwardACGACGTCAACCTGGTGATA
ReverseTTGAGTTTGGGCTGGTACTG
mntABCForwardTCGAACAGGTCAGTTTCAGC
ReverseCAGCAGGGTCTTGATCAGC
sodForwardACTGATGCGGTGAGTGATGT
ReverseCACTAGTGGTGCGTCGTTCT
bifAForwardCAGGTAACCCTGCTGGAAGT
ReverseGTGCACATTCTCGAAAGCAT
Table 2

The sequence similarity for the amplified PCR products by NCBI Blast.

GeneDescriptionIdentityAccession no.
mcoGene:
Pseudomonas putida strain PP112420, complete genome99%CP017073.1
Pseudomonas putida GB-1, complete genome99%CP000926.1
Protein:
Multispecies: multicopper oxidase (Pseudomonas)100%WP_012272302.1
mntABCGene:
Pseudomonas putida strain PP112420, complete genome99%CP017073.1
Pseudomonas putida GB-1, complete genome99%CP000926.1
Protein:
manganese ABC transporter ATP-binding protein (Pseudomonas putida)100%WP_012271765.1
manganese ABC transporter ATP-binding protein (Pseudomonas sp. NBRC 111140)99%WP_060492768.1
sodGene:
Pseudomonas putida KT2440 chromosome, complete genome95%NC002947.4
Protein:
Multispecies: superoxide dismutase (Pseudomonas)100%WP_012274023.1
superoxide dismutase (Pseudomonas sp. URIL 14HWK12:14)99%WP_027609138.1
bifAGene:
Pseudomonas putida KT2440 chromosome, complete genome89%NC002947.4
Protein:
Multispecies: cyclic diguanylate phosphodiesterase (Pseudomonas)100%WP_012272142.1
diguanylate phosphodiesterase (Pseudomonas sp. NBRC 11114)99%WP_060493478.1
  120 in total

1.  The c-di-GMP phosphodiesterase BifA regulates biofilm development in Pseudomonas putida.

Authors:  Alicia Jiménez-Fernández; Aroa López-Sánchez; Patricia Calero; Fernando Govantes
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.541

Review 2.  Get the message out: cyclic-Di-GMP regulates multiple levels of flagellum-based motility.

Authors:  Alan J Wolfe; Karen L Visick
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Mitochondria, reactive oxygen species, and chronological aging: a message from yeast.

Authors:  Yong Pan
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 4.032

4.  Contribution of reactive oxygen species to UV-B-induced damage in bacteria.

Authors:  Ana L Santos; Newton C M Gomes; Isabel Henriques; Adelaide Almeida; António Correia; Ângela Cunha
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 6.252

5.  Combination of heterogeneous catalase and superoxide dismutase protects Bifidobacterium longum strain NCC2705 from oxidative stress.

Authors:  Fanglei Zuo; Rui Yu; Xiujuan Feng; Gul Bahar Khaskheli; Lili Chen; Huiqin Ma; Shangwu Chen
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  cumA, a gene encoding a multicopper oxidase, is involved in Mn2+ oxidation in Pseudomonas putida GB-1.

Authors:  G J Brouwers; J P de Vrind; P L Corstjens; P Cornelis; C Baysse; E W de Vrind-de Jong
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Cyclic di-GMP: the first 25 years of a universal bacterial second messenger.

Authors:  Ute Römling; Michael Y Galperin; Mark Gomelsky
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 11.056

8.  Tolerance to oxidative stress is required for maximal xylem colonization by the xylem-limited bacterial phytopathogen, Xylella fastidiosa.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Yunho Lee; Michele M Igo; M Caroline Roper
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.663

9.  Molecular strategy for survival at a critical high temperature in Eschierichia coli.

Authors:  Masayuki Murata; Hiroko Fujimoto; Kaori Nishimura; Kannikar Charoensuk; Hiroshi Nagamitsu; Satish Raina; Tomoyuki Kosaka; Taku Oshima; Naotake Ogasawara; Mamoru Yamada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Hydrogen peroxide as a central redox signaling molecule in physiological oxidative stress: Oxidative eustress.

Authors:  Helmut Sies
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 11.799

View more
  3 in total

1.  Signal Sensing and Transduction Are Conserved between the Periplasmic Sensory Domains of BifA and SagS.

Authors:  Jozef Dingemans; Rebecca E Al-Feghali; Holger Sondermann; Karin Sauer
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.389

Review 2.  Precision targeting of food biofilm-forming genes by microbial scissors: CRISPR-Cas as an effective modulator.

Authors:  Sreejita Ghosh; Dibyajit Lahiri; Moupriya Nag; Tanmay Sarkar; Siddhartha Pati; Hisham Atan Edinur; Manoj Kumar; Muhammad R A Mohd Zain; Rina Rani Ray
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 3.  Recent Strategies for Bioremediation of Emerging Pollutants: A Review for a Green and Sustainable Environment.

Authors:  Saroj Bala; Diksha Garg; Banjagere Veerabhadrappa Thirumalesh; Minaxi Sharma; Kandi Sridhar; Baskaran Stephen Inbaraj; Manikant Tripathi
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-08-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.