Literature DB >> 30042010

Optimizing Treatment Sequence for Late-line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Using Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib.

Matthias Unseld1, Magdalena Drimmel1, Alexander Siebenhüner2, Andreas Gleiss3, Daniela Bianconi1, Markus Kieler1, Werner Scheithauer1, Thomas Winder2, Gerald W Prager4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment sequencing for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been highly debated. The thymidine-based nucleoside trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) and the multikinase inhibitor regorafenib have demonstrated clinical benefits in randomized phase III trials compared with placebo. However, limited data are available on the most optimal therapy sequence involving TAS-102 and regorafenib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the present retrospective, observational, real-life study, clinical data on mCRC patients treated with TAS-102 or an alternative salvage treatment at the Medical University of Vienna and University Hospital Zurich were collected from January 2013 to December 2016.
RESULTS: A total of 85 patients whose disease had progressed during fluoropyrimidine-based therapy (FBT) with or without an antibody were included. The disease control rate in patients treated with TAS-102 after FBT-based treatment was 24% compared with 35% in patients treated with regorafenib after FBT-based treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-7.47; P = .449). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients treated with TAS-102 was 2.8 months (quartile, 2.0-4.8 months) and 15.9 months, respectively. When the data were analyzed according to the subgroups of patients with or without an FBT-free period, the TAS-102-treated patients with a previous FBT-free interval had a PFS of 3.1 months and OS of 17.7 months compared with a PFS of 2.2 months and OS of 8.1 months for patients who received TAS-102 immediately after FBT.
CONCLUSION: Our results have confirmed the efficacy of TAS-102 and regorafenib in the real-life setting. The treatment sequence analysis showed a tendency for longer PFS and OS for TAS-102-treated patients after an FBT-free interval. Prospective randomized data are needed to gain more information about the most beneficial therapy sequence in the salvage treatment of mCRC.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Metastatic colorectal cancer; Real life study; Regorafenib; TAS-102; Treatment sequence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30042010     DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer        ISSN: 1533-0028            Impact factor:   4.481


  8 in total

1.  Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in clinical practice: a feasible alternative for patients with good performance status.

Authors:  C Carriles; P Jimenez-Fonseca; M Sánchez-Cánovas; P Pimentel; A Carmona-Bayonas; T García; M Carbajales-Álvarez; A Lozano-Blázquez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Oncology Center.

Authors:  Anuj K Patel; Ritika Abhyankar; Lauren K Brais; Mei Sheng Duh; Victoria E Barghout; Lynn Huynh; Mihran A Yenikomshian; Kimmie Ng; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-10-01

3.  An Observational Study of Trifluridine/Tipiracil-Containing Regimen Versus Regorafenib-Containing Regimen in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Meng-Che Hsieh; Kun-Ming Rau; Shung-Eing Lin; Kuang-Wen Liu; Chong-Chi Chiu; Chih-I Chen; Ling-Chiao Song; Hsin-Pao Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Prognostic scores for evaluating the survival benefit of regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an exploratory analysis of the REGOTAS study.

Authors:  Toshikazu Moriwaki; Shota Fukuoka; Toshiki Masuishi; Atsuo Takashima; Yosuke Kumekawa; Takeshi Kajiwara; Kentaro Yamazaki; Taito Esaki; Akitaka Makiyama; Tadamichi Denda; Yukimasa Hatachi; Takeshi Suto; Naotoshi Sugimoto; Masanobu Enomoto; Toshiaki Ishikawa; Tomomi Kashiwada; Eiji Oki; Yoshito Komatsu; Akihito Tsuji; Kenji Tsuchihashi; Daisuke Sakai; Hideki Ueno; Takao Tamura; Kimihiro Yamashita; Yasuhiro Shimada
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Regorafenib, TAS-102, or fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: any difference in randomized trials?

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Qianqian Wang; Xicheng Wang; Jian Li; Lin Shen; Zhi Peng
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Improved Overall Survival of Colorectal Cancer under Multidisciplinary Team: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dong Peng; Yu-Xi Cheng; Yong Cheng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Selection of Oral Therapeutics in China for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jianxia Li; Yue Cai; Yanhong Deng
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-06-07

8.  Review of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment pathways and early clinical experience of trifluridine/tipiracil in the UK named patient programme.

Authors:  Timothy Iveson; Angela M Carter; Kai-Keen Shiu; Clare Spooner; Daniel Stevens; Saifee Mullamitha
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.