| Literature DB >> 30041490 |
Jiajie Zang1, Baozhang Luo2, Yaping Wang3, Zhenni Zhu4, Zhengyuan Wang5, Xin He6, Wenjing Wang7, Yan Guo8, Xiao Chen9, Chunfang Wang10, Changyi Guo11, Shurong Zou12, Xiaodong Jia13, Fan Wu14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the rapid development of Shanghai's economy, diet habits have undergone great changes. The study aimed to examine the situation of out-of-home (OH) eating in Shanghai adults and the nutrition characteristics of eating in different dining places, and to assess the social demographic determinants of eating OH.Entities:
Keywords: Shanghai China; canteens; dietary intake; out-of-home eating; restaurants
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30041490 PMCID: PMC6073505 DOI: 10.3390/nu10070951
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Characteristics of study participants.
| Characteristics | Men | % of Sub-Group | Women | % of Sub-Group | All | % of Sub-Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age group (years) | ||||||
| 18–44 | 261 | 31.0 | 256 | 30.2 | 517 | 30.6 |
| 45–59 | 282 | 34.5 | 292 | 34.5 | 574 | 34.0 |
| ≥60 | 299 | 35.5 | 299 | 35.3 | 598 | 35.4 |
| Marital Status | ||||||
| Married | 672 | 79.8 | 643 | 75.9 | 1315 | 77.9 |
| Other marital status | 170 | 20.2 | 204 | 24.1 | 374 | 22.1 |
| Occupation | ||||||
| Professional job | 218 | 25.9 | 146 | 17.2 | 364 | 21.6 |
| Labor job | 103 | 12.2 | 75 | 8.9 | 178 | 10.5 |
| Others | 521 | 61.9 | 626 | 73.9 | 1147 | 67.9 |
| Years of education (years) | ||||||
| ≤6 | 174 | 20.7 | 231 | 27.3 | 405 | 24.0 |
| 7–9 | 234 | 27.8 | 250 | 29.5 | 484 | 28.7 |
| 10–12 | 216 | 25.7 | 191 | 22.6 | 407 | 24.1 |
| >12 | 218 | 25.9 | 175 | 20.7 | 393 | 23.3 |
| Weight Status | ||||||
| Underweight | 28 | 3.3 | 32 | 3.8 | 60 | 3.6 |
| Normal | 403 | 47.9 | 492 | 58.1 | 895 | 53.0 |
| Overweight | 322 | 38.2 | 260 | 30.7 | 582 | 34.5 |
| Obese | 80 | 9.5 | 35 | 4.1 | 115 | 6.8 |
| Non-measured | 9 | 1.1 | 28 | 3.3 | 37 | 2.2 |
| Smoker | ||||||
| No | 427 | 50.7 | 841 | 99.29 | 1268 | 75.1 |
| Yes | 415 | 49.3 | 6 | 0.71 | 421 | 25.0 |
| Drinker | ||||||
| No | 506 | 60.1 | 778 | 91.85 | 1284 | 76.0 |
| Yes | 275 | 32.7 | 43 | 5.08 | 318 | 18.8 |
| Non-reported | 61 | 7.2 | 26 | 3.07 | 87 | 5.2 |
| Household size | ||||||
| 1–2 persons | 382 | 45.4 | 356 | 42.03 | 738 | 43.7 |
| 3 persons | 295 | 35.0 | 317 | 37.43 | 612 | 36.2 |
| ≥4 persons | 165 | 19.6 | 174 | 20.54 | 339 | 20.1 |
| Family Income (RMB/person) | ||||||
| <20,000 | 289 | 34.3 | 316 | 37.31 | 605 | 35.8 |
| 20,000–50,000 | 428 | 50.8 | 416 | 49.11 | 844 | 50.0 |
| >50,000 | 125 | 14.9 | 114 | 13.46 | 239 | 14.2 |
| Non-reported | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.12 | 1 | 0.1 |
| Region | ||||||
| Urban | 412 | 48.9 | 419 | 49.47 | 831 | 49.2 |
| Suburban | 204 | 24.2 | 207 | 24.44 | 411 | 24.3 |
| Rural | 226 | 26.8 | 221 | 26.09 | 447 | 26.5 |
Frequency of eating OH and restaurant meals of adults living in urban, suburban, and rural areas.
| Item | Meals | All | % of Sub-Group | Urban | % of Sub-Group | Suburban | % of Sub-Group | Rural | % of Sub-Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eating OH | Breakfast | 414 | 25.6 | 237 | 26.7 | 93 | 24.9 | 84 | 19.6 |
| Lunch | 841 | 47.0 | 422 | 46.7 | 202 | 51.7 | 217 | 44.3 | |
| Dinner | 334 | 18.5 | 158 | 17.6 | 69 | 19.8 | 107 | 22.4 | |
| One Day | 942 | 55.1 | 492 | 56.0 | 215 | 56.0 | 235 | 48.1 | |
| Eating at restaurants | Breakfast | 263 | 17.5 | 172 | 19.1 | 59 | 17.1 | 32 | 7.9 |
| Lunch | 192 | 12.8 | 127 | 13.2 | 34 | 16.2 | 31 | 7.0 | |
| Dinner | 154 | 10.4 | 100 | 10.9 | 28 | 12.3 | 26 | 5.6 | |
| One Day | 466 | 31.8 | 299 | 34.2 | 92 | 31.5 | 75 | 17.9 |
Figure 1Location of eating outside.
Energy and nutrients between people eating outside or at home.
| Items | β1 (Restaurant) | t1 | P1 | β2 (Canteen) | t2 | P2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DQD | 0.44 | 0.85 | 0.397 | 0.42 | 0.83 | 0.407 |
| HBS | ||||||
| LBS | −0.117 | −0.34 | 0.732 | −0.28 | −0.58 | 0.559 |
| Energy (kcal) | ||||||
| Protein (g) | ||||||
| Carbohydrate (g) | ||||||
| Fat (g) | ||||||
| Vitamin A (μg) | 48.29 | 1.15 | 0.252 | 66.95 | 1.62 | 0.105 |
| Vitamin D (μg) | −0.46 | −0.33 | 0.743 | −2.01 | −1.48 | 0.140 |
| Vitamin B1 (mg) | 0.03 | 1.65 | 0.100 | |||
| Vitamin B2 (mg) | 0.05 | 1.71 | 0.087 | 0.03 | 1.18 | 0.238 |
| Vitamin B6 (mg) | −0.00 | −0.78 | 0.436 | −0.00 | −0.97 | 0.334 |
| Vitamin B12 (μg) | 0.01 | 0.84 | 0.400 | −0.01 | −0.51 | 0.609 |
| Vitamin C (mg) | 2.26 | 0.50 | 0.619 | −0.58 | −0.13 | 0.897 |
| Na (mg) | 220.34 | 0.98 | 0.326 | |||
| Ca (mg) | 15.93 | 0.78 | 0.437 | 6.35 | 0.32 | 0.752 |
| Zn (mg) | 0.48 | 1.75 | 0.080 | |||
| Fe (mg) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Multivariable Model were adjusted by gender, age, marriage status, occupation, smoking, drinking, BMI status, residency, number of family members, and income. DQD: diet quality distance; HBS: higher bound score; LBS: lower bound score. Values in bold: statistical significant compared to that at home.
Logistic regression models for eating outside, classified by predictors.
| Items | Univariable Model | Multivariable Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||
| Men | Reference | Reference | ||
| Women | 0.80 (0.56, 1.13) | 0.060 | ||
| 18–44 | Reference | Reference | ||
| 45–59 | ||||
| >60 | ||||
| Married | Reference | Reference | ||
| Other marital status | 1.27 (0.88, 1.84) | 0.204 | ||
| Professional job | Reference | Reference | ||
| Labor job | 0.73 (0.41, 1.30) | 0.284 | ||
| Others | 0.75 (0.53, 1.07) | 0.117 | ||
| ≤6 | Reference | Reference | ||
| 7~9 | ||||
| 10~12 | ||||
| >12 | ||||
| No | Reference | Reference | ||
| Yes | 1.12 (0.75, 1.66) | 0.574 | ||
| No | Reference | Reference | ||
| Yes | ||||
| Underweight | 0.81 (0.44, 1.52) | 0.515 | 0.63 (0.30, 1.32) | 0.223 |
| Normal | Reference | Reference | ||
| Overweight | 0.82 (0.63, 1.07) | 0.145 | 0.94 (0.69, 1.29) | 0.716 |
| Obese | 0.99 (0.62, 1.59) | 0.969 | 1.30 (0.73, 2.31) | 0.369 |
| Urban | Reference | Reference | ||
| Suburban | ||||
| Rural | ||||
| 1-2 persons | Reference | Reference | ||
| 3 persons | 0.75 (0.55, 1.05) | 0.079 | ||
| ≥4 persons | 1.17 (0.88, 1.57) | 0.287 | 1.28 (0.87, 1.88) | 0.282 |
| <20,000 | Reference | Reference | ||
| 20,000–50,000 | 1.24 (0.90, 1.72) | 0.192 | ||
| >50,000 | 1.17 (0.75, 1.85) | 0.492 | ||
Values in bold: statistical significant compared to references.