Literature DB >> 30039747

Dualities between Tunisian provider beliefs and actions in abortion care.

Sarah Raifman1, Selma Hajri2, Caitlin Gerdts3, Diana Foster4.   

Abstract

Despite Tunisia's historically progressive reproductive health policies, Tunisian women now face significant challenges accessing legal abortion. Through in-depth interviews with providers at six facilities, we explored factors influencing provider attitudes about abortion and provider perspectives about abortion morality, safety, and legality. We found that gatekeepers (counsellors and front office staff) generally believed abortion was immoral, while obstetricians and gynecologists were more likely to support an individual's right to access abortion. However, providers' actions do not necessarily align with their stated beliefs regarding abortion; some providers who said they support abortion access generally held personal beliefs about when and for whom abortion is appropriate which influenced their provision of care. System-level barriers to abortion provision, such as a lack of resources, hinder some providers who may otherwise be willing to provide the service. These system-level barriers may also account for inconsistencies between providers' beliefs and actions related to abortion. Illuminating the complexity in provider beliefs and attitudes about abortion can help us to better understand whether and why abortion care is provided, as well as the factors that ultimately determine whether a woman can obtain an abortion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tunisia; abortion; conscientious objection; gatekeepers; quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30039747     DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1472486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health Matters        ISSN: 0968-8080


  4 in total

Review 1.  Why does abortion stigma matter? A scoping review and hybrid analysis of qualitative evidence illustrating the role of stigma in the quality of abortion care.

Authors:  Annik Mahalia Sorhaindo; Antonella Francheska Lavelanet
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 2.  Exploring and Monitoring Privacy, Confidentiality, and Provider Bias in Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Provision to Young People: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Andrew G Corley; Andrea Sprockett; Dominic Montagu; Nirali M Chakraborty
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  The Right to Abortion in Tunisia after the Revolution of 2011: Legal, Medical, and Social Arrangements as Seen through Seven Abortion Stories.

Authors:  Irene Maffi; Malika Affes
Journal:  Health Hum Rights       Date:  2019-12

4.  The role of midwives in first-trimester abortion care: A 40-year experience in Tunisia.

Authors:  Selma Hajri; Hedia Belhadj
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.561

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.