Literature DB >> 36152401

Why does abortion stigma matter? A scoping review and hybrid analysis of qualitative evidence illustrating the role of stigma in the quality of abortion care.

Annik Mahalia Sorhaindo1, Antonella Francheska Lavelanet2.   

Abstract

Abortion stigma shapes the environment in which abortion is delivered and received and can have important implications for quality in abortion care. However, this has not previously been clearly articulated and evidenced. We conducted a scoping review of existing qualitative evidence to characterize the relationship between abortion stigma and quality in abortion care. Using a systematic process, we located 50 qualitative studies to include in our analysis. We applied the interface of the WHO quality of care and abortion stigma frameworks to the qualitative evidence to capture manifestations of the interaction between abortion stigma and quality in abortion care in the existing literature. Four overarching themes linked to abortion stigma emerged: A) abortion as a sin and other religious views; B) regulation of abortion; C) judgement, labelling and marking; and D) shame, denial, and secrecy. We further characterized the emerging ways in which abortion stigma operates to inhibit quality in abortion care into seven manifestations of the relationship between abortion stigma and quality in abortion care: 1) poor treatment and the repercussions, 2) gatekeeping and obstruction of access, 3) avoiding disclosure, 4) arduous and unnecessary requirements, 5) poor infrastructure and lack of resources, 6) punishment and threats and 7) lack of a designated place for abortion services. This evidence complements the abortion stigma-adapted WHO quality of care framework suggested by the International Network for the Reduction of Abortion Discrimination and Stigma (inroads) by illustrating specifically how the postulated stigma-related barriers to quality abortion care occur in practice. Further research should assess these manifestations in the quantitative literature and contribute to the development of quality in abortion care indicators that include measures of abortion stigma, and the development of abortion stigma reduction interventions to improve quality in abortion care.
Copyright © 2022 World Health Organization. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion stigma; Indicators; Measurement; Qualitative research; Quality in abortion care; Thematic analysis; Treatment

Year:  2022        PMID: 36152401      PMCID: PMC9577010          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   5.379


  87 in total

1.  Analyzing the impacts of abortion clinic structures and processes: a qualitative analysis of women's negative experience of abortion clinics.

Authors:  Katrina Kimport; Kate Cockrill; Tracy A Weitz
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Why women are dying from unsafe abortion: narratives of Ghanaian abortion providers.

Authors:  Carolyn M Payne; Michelle Precourt Debbink; Ellen A Steele; Caroline T Buck; Lisa A Martin; Jane A Hassinger; Lisa H Harris
Journal:  Afr J Reprod Health       Date:  2013-06

3.  Implementing the liberalized abortion law in Kigali, Rwanda: Ambiguities of rights and responsibilities among health care providers.

Authors:  Jessica Påfs; Stephen Rulisa; Marie Klingberg-Allvin; Pauline Binder-Finnema; Aimable Musafili; Birgitta Essén
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 2.372

4.  Self-managed abortion: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Heidi Moseson; Stephanie Herold; Sofia Filippa; Jill Barr-Walker; Sarah E Baum; Caitlin Gerdts
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 5.237

5.  The political economy of abortion in India: cost and expenditure patterns.

Authors:  Ravi Duggal
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2004-11

6.  "It's not something you talk about really": information barriers encountered by women who travel long distances for abortion care.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Jenna Jerman; Lori Frohwirth
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Providing medical abortion in general practice: General practitioner insights and tips for future providers.

Authors:  Seema Deb; Asvini K Subasinghe; Danielle Mazza
Journal:  Aust J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-06

8.  Perceived abortion stigma and psychological well-being over five years after receiving or being denied an abortion.

Authors:  M Antonia Biggs; Katherine Brown; Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.

Authors:  James Thomas; Angela Harden
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Community perception of abortion, women who abort and abortifacients in Kisumu and Nairobi counties, Kenya.

Authors:  Boniface Ayanbekongshie Ushie; Kenneth Juma; Grace Kimemia; Ramatou Ouedraogo; Martin Bangha; Michael Mutua
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.