Literature DB >> 30039341

A reel mechanism-based robotic colonoscope with high safety and maneuverability.

Dongkyu Lee1, Seonggun Joe1, Hyeongseok Kang1, Taeyoung An1, Byungkyu Kim2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: At present, the colonoscopy is the most common method of screening for colorectal cancer. However, endoscopists still encounter difficulties with intubation, primarily due to the structural diversity (e.g., path, shape, and size) and viscoelasticity of the colon. Therefore, well-trained, skillful operators are required to overcome these factors and operate colonoscopes without harming patients.
OBJECTIVES: In our previous work, we presented a reel mechanism-based robotic colonoscope designed to mitigate the difficulties of conventional colonoscopies. Although we reported excellent mobile performance with respect to the robot, we did not provide an in-depth discussion concerning patient safety. Therefore, in this article, we propose a method of improving robot safety, and this is verified by investigating the static and dynamic forces acting on the colon. In addition, the maneuverability and safety of the robot in the in vitro condition are evaluated.
METHODS: The safety solution is provided by covering the robot's legs with silicone. To evaluate the results, the reaction force according to leg deformation is measured. Then, the force transmitted to the colon is also measured when the robot moves through various environments. Finally, a mobility test on an excised porcine colon is performed to simultaneously verify the robot's maneuverability and safety.
RESULTS: We verify that the static and dynamic force acting on the colon is less than the burst force of a human colon. In addition, the maneuverability of the robotic colonoscope shows reliable locomotion performance even with the soft material covering the legs; it has forward velocities of 9.552 ± 1.940 mm/s on a flat path.
CONCLUSION: Owing to the reliable locomotion mechanism with the safety-securing silicone, the robot achieves high and reliable maneuverability without any scratches or perforations to the porcine colon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High maneuverability; High safety; Locomotion test; Microrobot; Reel mechanism; Robotic colonoscope

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30039341     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6362-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Development of a colon endoscope robot that adjusts its locomotion through the use of reinforcement learning.

Authors:  G Trovato; M Shikanai; G Ukawa; J Kinoshita; N Murai; J W Lee; H Ishii; A Takanishi; K Tanoue; S Ieiri; K Konishi; M Hashizume
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  A novel technique for endoscopic snare polypectomy using a duodenoscope in combination with a colonoscope for the inaccessible colonic polyp.

Authors:  G Dafnis
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 3.  The difficult colonoscopy.

Authors:  Todd N Witte; Robert Enns
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  Design of wormlike automated robotic endoscope: dynamic interaction between endoscopic balloon and surrounding tissues.

Authors:  Carmen C Y Poon; Billy Leung; Cecilia K W Chan; James Y W Lau; Philip W Y Chiu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Mechanical properties of the colon: comparison of the features of the African and European colon in vitro.

Authors:  D A Watters; A N Smith; M A Eastwood; K C Anderson; R A Elton; J W Mugerwa
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Colorectal cancer following negative colonoscopy: is 5-year screening the correct interval to recommend?

Authors:  Steven K Nakao; Steven Fassler; Iswanto Sucandy; Soo Kim; D Mark Zebley
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Honey bee hairs and pollenkitt are essential for pollen capture and removal.

Authors:  Guillermo J Amador; Marguerite Matherne; D'Andre Waller; Megha Mathews; Stanislav N Gorb; David L Hu
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.956

8.  Design and preliminary evaluation of a self-steering, pneumatically driven colonoscopy robot.

Authors:  Hossein Dehghani; C Ross Welch; Abolfazl Pourghodrat; Carl A Nelson; Dmitry Oleynikov; Prithviraj Dasgupta; Benjamin S Terry
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2017-01-26

9.  A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?

Authors:  C J A Bowles; R Leicester; C Romaya; E Swarbrick; C B Williams; O Epstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  The endoscopy evolution: 'the superscope era'.

Authors:  Nisha Patel; Ara Darzi; Julian Teare
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-13
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for Robotic Flexible Endoscopy at the Time of COVID-19.

Authors:  Onaizah Onaizah; Zaneta Koszowska; Conchubhair Winters; Venkatamaran Subramanian; David Jayne; Alberto Arezzo; Keith L Obstein; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-02-25

2.  Application of robotic technologies in lower gastrointestinal tract endoscopy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Harpreet Kaur Sekhon Inderjit Singh; Emily Rose Armstrong; Sujay Shah; Reza Mirnezami
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-12-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.