Literature DB >> 23052520

Colorectal cancer following negative colonoscopy: is 5-year screening the correct interval to recommend?

Steven K Nakao1, Steven Fassler, Iswanto Sucandy, Soo Kim, D Mark Zebley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the high sensitivity of screening colonoscopy, polyps and cancers can still go undetected. With the polyp-to-cancer transformation cycle averaging 7-10 years, present guidelines recommend repeat colonoscopy within 10 years after negative screening. However, not all colorectal malignancies follow this decade-long progression. This study evaluates the incidence and pathology of colorectal cancers following a previous negative screening colonoscopy.
METHODS: Records of patients who underwent a colectomy at our institution, from 1998 to 2009, were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 1,784 patient records were screened using exclusion criteria for inclusion in this study. The patients were divided as follows: Group 1 included patients with a negative colonoscopy within the previous 5 years; Group 2 included patients without a previous colonoscopy or with a previous colonoscopy more than 5 years prior. Group 1 patients were evaluated by colonoscopy for anemia, diverticulitis, signs of obstruction, and bleeding. Age, tumor location, operation performed, and pathology findings were recorded. The χ(2) test and paired t test were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 233 patients were included in this study. Group 1 contained 43 patients with a mean age of 73 years (range = 35-94, median = 75). Group 2 had 190 patients with a mean age of 68 years (range = 19-91, median = 70). Group 1 consisted of 18 male and 25 female patients, and Group 2 included 94 male and 96 female patients. Both groups were further classified into the following age categories: <50 years, 50-80 years, and >80 years. Eighteen percent of the total study population had newly discovered colorectal cancer within a 5-year colonoscopy screening period. There were no significant differences in the distribution of the T and N stages between the two groups and no statistically significant differences when the rate of lymphovascular invasion (19 vs. 17 %; p = 0.39) and perineural invasion (7 vs. 11 %; p = 0.58) were compared.
CONCLUSIONS: Within 5 years, 18 % of our study population developed colorectal cancer. Most of these malignancies were found within the 50-80-year age group and located predominantly in the right colon and distally in the sigmoid and rectum. While distal cancers may be visualized by flexible sigmoidoscopy, those located more proximally may be missed, necessitating the need for a full colonoscopy. Although staging was similar between the two groups, Group 1 tumors were less aggressive despite having appeared within 5 years. As a result of our incidence of colorectal cancer within a 5-year interval, a shorter period for routine colonoscopy may be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23052520     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2543-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  22 in total

Review 1.  Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Evelyn P Whitlock; Jennifer S Lin; Elizabeth Liles; Tracy L Beil; Rongwei Fu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Jenny Chang-Claude; Christoph M Seiler; Alexander Rickert; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Analysis of molecular alterations in left- and right-sided colorectal carcinomas reveals distinct pathways of carcinogenesis: proposal for new molecular profile of colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Tamotsu Sugai; Wataru Habano; Yu-Fei Jiao; Mitsunori Tsukahara; Yuichiro Takeda; Koki Otsuka; Shin-ichi Nakamura
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; E Robert Greenberg; Michael Beach; Robert S Sandler; Dennis Ahnen; Robert W Haile; Carol A Burke; Dale C Snover; Robert S Bresalier; Gail McKeown-Eyssen; Jack S Mandel; John H Bond; Rosalind U Van Stolk; Robert W Summers; Richard Rothstein; Timothy R Church; Bernard F Cole; Tim Byers; Leila Mott; John A Baron
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Brian Bressler; Lawrence F Paszat; Zhongliang Chen; Deanna M Rothwell; Chris Vinden; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Jenny Chang-Claude; Christoph M Seiler; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Jaroslaw Regula; Ewa Kraszewska; Marcin Polkowski; Urszula Wojciechowska; Joanna Didkowska; Maria Zwierko; Maciej Rupinski; Marek P Nowacki; Eugeniusz Butruk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Meredith A Goldwasser; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; David R Urbach; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies.

Authors:  D Heresbach; T Barrioz; M G Lapalus; D Coumaros; P Bauret; P Potier; D Sautereau; C Boustière; J C Grimaud; C Barthélémy; J Sée; I Serraj; P N D'Halluin; B Branger; T Ponchon
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 10.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2008: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and cancer screening issues.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Otis Webb Brawley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  6 in total

1.  A reel mechanism-based robotic colonoscope with high safety and maneuverability.

Authors:  Dongkyu Lee; Seonggun Joe; Hyeongseok Kang; Taeyoung An; Byungkyu Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Split-Dose Bowel Preparation Reduces the Need for Early Repeat Colonoscopy Without Improving Adenoma Detection Rate.

Authors:  Li Wang; Brandon S Sprung; Arthur J DeCross; Danielle Marino
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death.

Authors:  Douglas A Corley; Christopher D Jensen; Amy R Marks; Wei K Zhao; Jeffrey K Lee; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Jolanda de Boer; Bruce H Fireman; Joanne E Schottinger; Virginia P Quinn; Nirupa R Ghai; Theodore R Levin; Charles P Quesenberry
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Association between appendectomy and subsequent colorectal cancer development: an Asian population study.

Authors:  Shih-Chi Wu; William Tzu-Liang Chen; Chih-Hsin Muo; Tao-Wei Ke; Chu-Wen Fang; Fung-Chang Sung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Assessing colonoscopic inspection skill using a virtual withdrawal simulation: a preliminary validation of performance metrics.

Authors:  Christine M Zupanc; Guy M Wallis; Andrew Hill; Robin Burgess-Limerick; Stephan Riek; Annaliese M Plooy; Mark S Horswill; Marcus O Watson; Hans de Visser; David Conlan; David G Hewett
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  A link between appendectomy and gastrointestinal cancers: a large-scale population-based cohort study in Korea.

Authors:  Youn Young Park; Kil-Yong Lee; Seong Taek Oh; Sang Hyun Park; Kyung Do Han; Jaeim Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.