Literature DB >> 30038830

ALTERED SAGITTAL PLANE HIP BIOMECHANICS IN ADOLESCENT MALE DISTANCE RUNNERS WITH A HISTORY OF LOWER EXTREMITY INJURY.

Pamela B Lachniet, Jeffery A Taylor-Haas1, Mark V Paterno1, Christopher A DiCesare2, Kevin R Ford3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity overuse injuries, including bone stress injuries (BSI), are common in runners and may result in prolonged recovery and time off from running. Identifying risk factors for running-related overuse injuries may have a clinically relevant role in prevention of these injuries.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare an adolescent and young adult population of male runners known to have a history of BSI with an injury-free cohort and retrospectively assess for kinematic differences that may differentiate the two cohorts. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory case control investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
METHODS: 25 male high school and collegiate cross-country runners were enrolled. Ten self-reported a prior history of BSI consisting of lower extremity stress fracture or shin splints/medial tibial stress syndrome and were categorized as injured (INJ). Fifteen self-reported no prior history of lower extremity injury and were categorized as uninjured (UNINJ). All runners were pain-free at time of testing. Runners ran at a self-selected speed on a treadmill with retro-reflective markers attached to thorax, pelvis, and each lower extremity segment. Three-dimensional kinematic calculations were made during stance phase (initial treadmill heel contact to toe off) and averaged over 20 steps. One-way ANCOVA was used to compare kinematic differences at the hip and knee between the INJ and UNINJ cohort.
RESULTS: Runners in the INJ group demonstrated greater peak hip flexion during stance phase on both the right limb [INJ = 32.5°(±3.8°) vs. UNINJ = 26.9°(±4.6°); p<0.01] and the left limb [INJ = 31.2°(±4.8°) vs. UNINJ = 26.8°(±3.1°); p = 0.01] when compared to the UNINJ group. No significant difference in step length or step rate between the INJ and UNINJ cohorts was noted when normalized to height and weight (p = 0.39 and 0.39).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate increased peak stance phase hip flexion in a population of young adult male runners with a previous history of BSI. This association may represent an important preliminary finding in the development of a clinically relevant tool to identify risk of BSI. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, future prospective investigations are warranted to validate these findings to determine if these alterations are compensatory following an injury or predictive of a future injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone stress injury; kinematics; running

Year:  2018        PMID: 30038830      PMCID: PMC6044588     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  24 in total

1.  Kinematic-based technique for event time determination during gait.

Authors:  S J Stanhope; T M Kepple; D A McGuire; N L Roman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review.

Authors:  R N van Gent; D Siem; M van Middelkoop; A G van Os; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; B W Koes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Energy absorption of impacts during running at various stride lengths.

Authors:  T R Derrick; J Hamill; G E Caldwell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Changes in muscle activation patterns when running step rate is increased.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Chumanov; Christa M Wille; Max P Michalski; Bryan C Heiderscheit
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Step frequency and lower extremity loading during running.

Authors:  H Hobara; T Sato; M Sakaguchi; T Sato; K Nakazawa
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.118

7.  Increased medial longitudinal arch mobility, lower extremity kinematics, and ground reaction forces in high-arched runners.

Authors:  D S Blaise Williams; Robin N Tierney; Robert J Butler
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Reduced hip strength is associated with increased hip motion during running in young adult and adolescent male long-distance runners.

Authors:  Jeffery A Taylor-Haas; Jason A Hugentobler; Christopher A DiCesare; Kathryn C Hickey Lucas; Nathaniel A Bates; Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-08

9.  Effects of step rate manipulation on joint mechanics during running.

Authors:  Bryan C Heiderscheit; Elizabeth S Chumanov; Max P Michalski; Christa M Wille; Michael B Ryan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Overuse injuries in high school runners: lifetime prevalence and prevention strategies.

Authors:  Adam S Tenforde; Lauren C Sayres; Mary L McCurdy; Hervé Collado; Kristin L Sainani; Michael Fredericson
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.298

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reliability of 2-Dimensional Video Analysis in Adolescent Runners.

Authors:  Yukiko Matsuzaki; Madison R Heath; Julianne M Khan; Alexandra T Mackie; Elad Spitzer; Peter D Fabricant
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2022-03-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.