David A Nace1, Subashan K Perera2, Joseph T Hanlon3, Stacey Saracco3, Gulsum Anderson3, Steven J Schweon4, Michele Klein-Fedyshin5, Charles B Wessel5, Mary Mulligan6, Paul J Drinka7, Christopher J Crnich8. 1. Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: naceda@upmc.edu. 2. Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 3. Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 4. Infection Prevention Consultant, Saylorsburg, PA. 5. Health Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 6. AMDA-The Society of Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, Columbia, MD. 7. Division of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. 8. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; William S. Middleton VA Hospital, Madison, WI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify a set of signs and symptoms most likely to indicate uncomplicated cystitis in noncatheterized nursing home residents ≥65 years of age using consensus-based methods informed by a literature review. DESIGN: Literature review and modified Delphi survey with strict inclusion criteria. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Expert panel of 20 physicians certified in geriatric medicine and/or medical direction, actively practicing in post-acute and long-term care settings. METHODS: The authors performed a literature review to produce a comprehensive list of potential signs and symptoms of presumptive uncomplicated cystitis, including nonspecific "quality control" items deemed unlikely to indicate uncomplicated cystitis. The expert panel rated their agreement for each sign/symptom using a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Agreed upon signs and symptoms were summarized using a diagnostic algorithm for easy clinical use. RESULTS: The literature review identified 16 signs and symptoms that were evaluated in 3 Delphi survey rounds. The response rate was 100% for round 1 and 95% for the second 2 rounds. Consensus agreement for inclusion was achieved for dysuria on round 1 with exclusion of the 3 quality controls, and "offensive smelling urine." Consensus in the second round was reached for including 4 additional items (gross hematuria, suprapubic pain, urinary frequency, and urinary urgency). Round 3 evaluated dysuria alone and combinations of symptoms. Consensus that dysuria alone is sufficient for diagnosis of cystitis was not reached. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The panel identified 5 signs and symptoms likely indicative of uncomplicated cystitis in nursing home residents and developed a diagnostic algorithm that can be used to promote antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes. Given similarities in populations, the algorithm may also be applicable to the older adult and the broader post-acute/long-term care populations.
OBJECTIVES: To identify a set of signs and symptoms most likely to indicate uncomplicated cystitis in noncatheterized nursing home residents ≥65 years of age using consensus-based methods informed by a literature review. DESIGN: Literature review and modified Delphi survey with strict inclusion criteria. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Expert panel of 20 physicians certified in geriatric medicine and/or medical direction, actively practicing in post-acute and long-term care settings. METHODS: The authors performed a literature review to produce a comprehensive list of potential signs and symptoms of presumptive uncomplicated cystitis, including nonspecific "quality control" items deemed unlikely to indicate uncomplicated cystitis. The expert panel rated their agreement for each sign/symptom using a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Agreed upon signs and symptoms were summarized using a diagnostic algorithm for easy clinical use. RESULTS: The literature review identified 16 signs and symptoms that were evaluated in 3 Delphi survey rounds. The response rate was 100% for round 1 and 95% for the second 2 rounds. Consensus agreement for inclusion was achieved for dysuria on round 1 with exclusion of the 3 quality controls, and "offensive smelling urine." Consensus in the second round was reached for including 4 additional items (gross hematuria, suprapubic pain, urinary frequency, and urinary urgency). Round 3 evaluated dysuria alone and combinations of symptoms. Consensus that dysuria alone is sufficient for diagnosis of cystitis was not reached. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The panel identified 5 signs and symptoms likely indicative of uncomplicated cystitis in nursing home residents and developed a diagnostic algorithm that can be used to promote antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes. Given similarities in populations, the algorithm may also be applicable to the older adult and the broader post-acute/long-term care populations.
Suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most commonly diagnosed
infection, and the leading reason for antibiotic use, in nursing homes.[1-3] Unfortunately, much of the treatment for suspected UTI is unnecessary,
placing residents at risk of harm from adverse drug events; Clostridium
difficile infections; and risk of development of, or exposure to,
antibiotic resistant organisms.[3-8]Clinical uncertainty surrounding asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is the major
driver for overtreatment of UTI.[9-11] By definition,
individuals with ASB do not have any specific urinary symptoms despite growth of
bacteria on a urine culture. It is clear from numerous studies over the past four
decades that ASB in older adults should not be treated.[3] Several professional societies have issued statements
discouraging urine testing and antibiotic treatment in the absence of urinary
symptoms.[12, 13] However, many clinicians continue to treat ASB in
older adults, citing uncertainty regarding the exact signs and symptoms of UTI in
this population.[14, 15]Several sets of diagnostic criteria for UTI in the long-term care setting
have been developed to aid clinicians in decision making.[16-19]
These criteria serve various purposes such as promoting retrospective comparative
benchmarking or establishing minimum criteria necessary to initiate antibiotic
therapy. These criteria are frequently not followed due to lack of awareness,
complexity, as well as concerns of low sensitivity and poor positive predictive
value.[3, 20] Another drawback of these criteria is that they consider UTI as a
broad clinical entity. In truth, UTI includes a spectrum of diseases that can range
from uncomplicated cystitis, to catheter associated UTI, prostatitis, epididymitis,
pyelonephritis, and urosepsis.[21, 22] The epidemiology and natural history of
each of these subtypes will differ and management should be ideally tailored to the
presenting condition.[21] It is widely
accepted that uncomplicated cystitis is the most common type of suspected UTI and is
generally less severe than pyelonephritis or urosepsis.[22-25]
Clinicians are frequently challenged when differentiating uncomplicated cystitis
from ASB. Given this, identifying a set of diagnostic criteria for uncomplicated
cystitis is an important need.The objective of this study was to identify a set of signs and symptoms most
likely to indicate uncomplicated cystitis in non-catheterized nursing home residents
≥ 65 years of age using consensus based methods informed by a literature
review. We used a modified Delphi approach involving an extensive background
literature search and a series of structured surveys completed by a panel of
practicing experts in geriatric, post-acute, and long-term care medicine.[26-33] We then created an algorithm to aid nursing home clinicians in the
diagnosis of uncomplicated cystitis.
METHODS
Comprehensive Literature Review and Survey Development
The authors worked with two medical librarians at the University of
Pittsburgh to conduct a literature review restricted to English language
articles in PubMed and Embase from 1980 to 2016 using a combination of terms
including urinary tract infections, urinary tract, infections, nursing homes,
cognitively impaired, and aged. The search strategy for the overarching question
is in Appendix 1.
Article abstracts were reviewed and those evaluating the presence of signs and
symptoms of cystitis were selected for full review. Moreover, existing
guidelines for the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents were
reviewed.[16-19] A preliminary list of potential signs and
symptoms to be assessed in the Delphi survey rounds was assembled. Three signs
and symptoms not considered indicative of uncomplicated
cystitis were also identified for use as quality controls. It was expected that
these three quality control items would be rejected.
Expert Panel for Delphi
Accurate diagnosis of infections in post-acute and long-term care
(PA/LTC) presents many challenges owing to the unique characteristics of this
population. As such, the expert panel members for the Delphi survey had to have
both working knowledge of the PA/LTC environment as well as clinical expertise
in the care of nursing home residents, including those unable to report symptoms
due to advanced dementia, aphasia, or other conditions. A national panel of 20
physicians actively practicing in the PA/LTC setting was assembled. Participants
had to be board certified in geriatric medicine, be board certified in medical
direction, or have completed a fellowship in geriatric medicine. Appendix 2 lists the experts and
their current affiliations.
Data Collection and Analysis
The first round of the Delphi survey was conducted individually by
e-mail and participants were blind to the identity of other panel members. The
expert panel was asked to rate their agreement for each sign/symptom given the
following instructions: “This set of questions pertains to the diagnosis
of uncomplicated cystitis (in non-catheterized residents), in the absence of
warning signs that suggest complicated disease such as pyelonephritis or
prostatitis. Regardless of general prevalence, please indicate your level of
agreement that new onset or worsening of the following signs and symptoms
indicate uncomplicated bladder infection in nursing home residents.”
Agreement was measured using a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree;
2=disagree; 3=equivocal; 4=agree; 5=strongly agree). In the first round, the
goal was to conservatively determine signs/symptoms to include and exclude under
strict criteria. Criteria reaching consensus for inclusion would be considered
as potential “stand alone” criteria for evaluation in subsequent
rounds. For this round, consensus agreement was defined as a 95% lower
confidence interval limit of ≥ 4.0 for the item, whereas consensus
disagreement was defined as an upper 95% confidence limit of ≤ 3.0 for
the item. All items for which consensus could not be reached during the first
round were returned to the panel in the second round, along with their initial
rating and the mean rating for all panel members. Consensus agreement in the
second round was defined as 2/3 of the panel giving a rating of ≥ 4.0 for
the item. Finally, a third round survey was conducted to solicit the 2/3
majority expert panel opinion on single or combinations of individual
signs/symptoms identified in the first two rounds of the modified Delphi. The
results were summarized as a diagnostic flowchart to facilitate clinical use.
The University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board reviewed and approved
the Delphi survey as exempt.
RESULTS
The literature search revealed 712 studies in PubMed and 1048 in Embase,
yielding a total of 1219 articles after duplicates were removed. Following abstract
review, 90 were deemed relevant for full review and 19 reported prevalence of one or
more symptoms. Thirteen symptoms that might be and three unlikely to be (quality
controls) related to a urinary tract infection were included in the first round of
the Delphi survey (Table 1). Of the twenty
panel members, 50% were female, 15 held board certifications in geriatric medicine,
15 in medical direction, and 17 had completed a geriatric medicine fellowship.
Eighteen panel members met more than one inclusion criteria.
Table 1.
Modified Delphi Survey Rounds 1 & 2[†]
Round 1
Round 2
Sign or Symptom
Consensus Reached to Exclude Sign/Symptom
From Final Criteria
Consensus Reached to Include Sign/Symptom in
Final Criteria
Consensus Not Reached to Include
Signs/Symptom (Assessed Again in Round 2)
Consensus Reached to Include Sign/Symptom in
Final Criteria
Literature Based
Signs/Symptoms Potentially Related to UTI
1. Chills or Rigors
X
2. Dysuria
X
3. Fever (≥ 100 F, or repeated
temperatures > 99 F, and/or increase of ≥ 2 degrees F
above baseline temperature)
X
4. Urinary Frequency
X
X
5. Hematuria (gross)
X
X
6. Incontinence
X
7. Mental Status Change (delirium, altered
level of consciousness, confusion)
X
8. Malaise
X
9. Nocturia
X
10. Offensive Smelling Urine
X
11. Suprapubic pain
X
X
12. Turbid urine
X
13. Urinary Urgency
X
X
Signs/Symptoms Used as
Quality Control Variables*
14. Depressive Symptoms
X
15. Insomnia
X
16. Radiating Thigh Pain
X
Rounds 1 & 2 identified individual specific signs/symptoms to
include or exclude from final criteria. A third round (not shown) was
conducted to assess whether single or combinations of signs/symptoms were
adequate criteria.
Signs or symptoms not likely to be related to cystitis. These were
included to assess result validity
The first round response rate was 100%. One symptom,
“dysuria”, reached consensus criteria for inclusion. In addition, the
panel agreed on excluding the three nonspecific quality control items
(“insomnia”, “depression”, “radiating thigh
pain”), and “offensive smelling urine” as being indicative of
uncomplicated cystitis. The remaining 11 items which did not reach consensus were
included in the second round of the survey.The second round response rate was 95%. Consensus was reached on including
four additional symptoms (urinary frequency, urinary urgency, suprapubic pain and
gross hematuria).The third round addressed combinations of individual symptoms. The panel
failed to reach a 2/3 majority on dysuria being a sufficient minimal criterion by
itself; the combination of hematuria and frequency or urgency being a sufficient
minimal criteria in absence of dysuria; and combination of suprapubic pain and
frequency or urgency being a sufficient minimal criterion in absence of dysuria. The
results are qualitatively summarized in Figure
1 to enable easy clinical use.
Figure 1.
Algorithm for the Diagnostic Approach to Uncomplicated Cystitis in
Non-Catheterized Nursing Home Residents
DISCUSSION
In this study, a panel of physicians with expertise in geriatrics and PA/LTC
medicine was able to achieve consensus agreement on a set of signs and symptoms
likely to be related to uncomplicated cystitis in non-catheterized older nursing
home residents. The panel member’s agreement on exclusion of the three
quality control signs and symptoms unlikely to be UTI-related was reassuring. Using
this information, we were able to create a streamlined algorithm to facilitate the
diagnosis of uncomplicated cystitis in this population.This diagnostic algorithm is unique in that it deconstructs the concept of
suspected UTI into three potential domains: complicated UTI or other non-UTIinfection, likely cystitis, and unlikely
cystitis (e.g., ASB). The advantage of this algorithm is that it
provides the clinician with a guided framework for the diagnostic approach to UTI.
Considering UTI as one large homogenous category clouds diagnosis given the
multitude of possible symptoms. The main focus of this work was the differentiation
of uncomplicated cystitis from ASB. The algorithm highlights signs and/or symptoms
that would suggest the presence of complicated UTI or other non-UTIinfection, but does not attempt to define criteria for each of these
possibilities. Individuals meeting the criteria for complicated UTI or other
non-UTIinfection should be evaluated by a clinician, with decisions
for additional diagnostic testing and/or treatment based upon the results of the
evaluation and the individual’s clinical and hemodynamic status. Also, while
this work addressed the nursing home population, we believe the algorithm is
applicable to the older adult and post-acute / long-term care populations given
their similarities.This study has several limitations. Given a limited evidence base, we had to
rely on expert consensus methods to develop our diagnostic guideline. However, the
modified Delphi process is a widely accepted research methodology to reach consensus
which employs several strategies to reduce biases.[26–32, 34] These include the use of a thorough baseline
literature search as well as steps to ensure blinding of the panel members to each
other’s identity, thus promoting equal panel member input. Like all current
diagnostic guidelines for suspected UTI, it is not possible to determine the exact
sensitivity or specificity of this algorithm since no gold standard for the
diagnosis of UTI exists.[3, 14, 35] Our
diagnostic guideline is being tested in a cluster randomized trial. Individuals with
dementia represent a significant proportion of the nursing home population.
Obtaining a history from individuals with advanced stage dementia can prove
challenging. However, we do not believe this decreases the applicability of the
algorithm for several reasons. While prevalence rates will vary from facility to
facility, the vast majority of nursing home residents do not have advanced stage
dementia that would preclude their ability to communicate acute symptoms.[36, 37]
Also, it is possible to determine the presence of physical signs (e.g. suprapubic
pain, hematuria, increased voiding frequency, or obvious discomfort during voiding)
during clinical care and examination of such residents by the nursing staff or
clinicians. Also, risk of non-treatment must be questioned. Prior studies of ASB
included residents with dementia and showed no benefit in the absence of urinary
symptoms, no survival benefit was found in a cohort study of residents with advanced
dementia and suspected UTI, and many cases of uncomplicated cystitis resolve
spontaneously and without progression to pyelonephritis.[3, 38–41] As always, clinicians should be use
clinical judgment when applying guidelines such as this algorithm.There are a number of strengths of this study. The systematic literature
search strategies ensured current foundational background knowledge. As noted, the
Delphi process is widely accepted and is preferred over other consensus methods such
as nominal group techniques.[26, 27] The Delphi panel was comprised of a
national group of skilled and practicing PA/LTC physicians. Panel members had
practical knowledge of PA/LTC environment. Panel members also had direct knowledge
of the challenge of diagnosing UTI in the nursing home population, including those
with cognitive or communication impairment. As such, the work should be
generalizable to the larger nursing home population. Also, the response rate among
panel members was very high, suggesting the issue at hand is “near and
dear” to them.Implementing clinical guidelines or algorithms in the PA/LTC setting is
challenging. While it may be possible to implement change on a single unit or
facility, promoting practice change across many facilities is difficult. Identifying
strategies to implement this algorithm in a group of PA/LTC homes is a priority and
is the focus of an ongoing AHRQ-funded dissemination project by the authors and AMDA
– The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine (AHRQ - R18
HS023779).
CONCLUSIONS/RELEVANCE
We used a modified Delphi process to identify five signs and symptoms likely
indicative of uncomplicated cystitis, one of the most common problems encountered in
PA/LTC residents. The diagnostic algorithm developed as part of this project should
be of use to nursing home clinicians and can be used to promote antibiotic
stewardship efforts as required under the revised Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) requirements of participation[42]. We believe it is also applicable for use in the older adult and
broader post-acute / long-term care populations. Dissemination and implementation of
this algorithm is currently being evaluated in an ongoing national project.
Authors: Nick Daneman; Susan E Bronskill; Andrea Gruneir; Alice M Newman; Hadas D Fischer; Paula A Rochon; Geoffrey M Anderson; Chaim M Bell Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Carmen S J Willems; Joep van den Broek D'Obrenan; Mattijs E Numans; Theo J M Verheij; Alike W van der Velden Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2013-12-07 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: Joseph T Hanlon; Sherrie L Aspinall; Todd P Semla; Steven D Weisbord; Linda F Fried; C Bernie Good; Michael J Fine; Roslyn A Stone; Mary Jo V Pugh; Michelle I Rossi; Steven M Handler Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Alyssa B Dufour; Michele L Shaffer; Erika M C D'Agata; Daniel Habtemariam; Susan L Mitchell Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-11-28 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Manisha Juthani-Mehta; Vincent Quagliarello; Eleanor Perrelli; Virginia Towle; Peter H Van Ness; Mary Tinetti Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: David A Nace; Joseph T Hanlon; Christopher J Crnich; Paul J Drinka; Steven J Schweon; Gulsum Anderson; Subashan Perera Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Christine E Kistler; Anna S Beeber; Sheryl Zimmerman; Kimberly Ward; Claire E Farel; Keith Chrzan; Christopher J Wretman; Marcella H Boynton; Michael Pignone; Philip D Sloane Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-01-20 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Joseph T Hanlon; Subashan Perera; Steven Schweon; Paul Drinka; Christopher Crnich; David A Nace Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Carmel Hughes; David R Ellard; Anne Campbell; Rachel Potter; Catherine Shaw; Evie Gardner; Ashley Agus; Dermot O'Reilly; Martin Underwood; Mark Loeb; Bob Stafford; Michael Tunney Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Anna Song Beeber; Christine E Kistler; Sheryl Zimmerman; Cassandra Dictus; Kimberly Ward; Claire Farel; Keith Chrzan; Christopher J Wretman; Marcella Boyton-Hansen; Michael Pignone; Philip D Sloane Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Andrea Chambers; Cynthia Chen; Kevin Antoine Brown; Nick Daneman; Bradley Langford; Valerie Leung; Kwaku Adomako; Kevin L Schwartz; Julia E Moore; Jacquelyn Quirk; Sam MacFarlane; Tim Cronsberry; Gary E Garber Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: S D Kuil; S Hidad; J C Fischer; J Harting; C M P M Hertogh; J M Prins; M D de Jong; F van Leth; C Schneeberger Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 9.079