Literature DB >> 30037404

Impact of crystalline and amorphous iron- and aluminum hydroxides on mechanisms of phosphate adsorption and desorption.

Stella Gypser1, Florian Hirsch2, Anja M Schleicher3, Dirk Freese4.   

Abstract

Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopic experiments were carried out during phosphate adsorption on highly crystalline gibbsite, poorly crystalline 2-line-ferrihydrite and amorphous iron-aluminum-hydroxide mixtures in the molar ratio 1:0, 10:1, 5:1, 1:1, 1:5, 1:10 and 0:1. The OH stretching vibrational bands were utilized to analyze changes in structural and surface OH groups during adsorption, because the position of characteristic PO vibrational bands can shift depending on reaction conditions, pH or adsorbed phosphate content. Adsorption and desorption kinetics were studied at pH6 and different initial phosphate concentrations to achieve varying phosphate coverage on the mineral surfaces. For gibbsite the formation of AlHPO4 and Al2HPO4 can be assumed, while for ferrihydrite, a FeHPO4 or Fe2PO4 complex and the precipitation of FePO4 with longer equilibration time were proposed. Fe2HPO4 or a Fe2PO4 surface complex was deduced for Fe-hydroxides, an AlH2PO4 surface complex was identified for Al-hydroxide, and both displayed either hydrogen bonds to neighboring hydroxyl groups or hydrogen bonds to outer-sphere complexes. Fe:Al-hydroxide mixtures with high Al ratios showed a low phosphate desorption rate, while ferrihydrite and the Fe:Al-hydroxide mixtures with high Fe ratios had almost negligible desorption rates. It was concluded that within the weakly associated amorphous FeO(OH) materials, FePO4 precipitated, which was bound by outer-sphere hydrogen bonds. With high Al ratios, desorption increased, which indicated weaker phosphate binding of both inner-sphere and outer-sphere complexes and hence, either no or minor quantities of precipitate. Ferrihydrite showed a more rigid structure and a lower extent of precipitation compared to amorphous Fe-hydroxide.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adsorption; Desorption; FT-IR; Phosphate; Precipitation; Surface complexation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 30037404     DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2017.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)        ISSN: 1001-0742            Impact factor:   5.565


  4 in total

1.  Phosphate-modified ferric-based material remediates lead and arsenic co-contaminated soil and enhances maize seedling growth.

Authors:  Yining Yuan; Ming Lu; Naimei Tu; Yaoyao Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Enhanced phosphate removal with fine activated alumina synthesized from a sodium aluminate solution: performance and mechanism.

Authors:  Guoyu Wu; Guihua Liu; Xiaobin Li; Zhihong Peng; Qiusheng Zhou; Tiangui Qi
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.361

3.  Fabrication of Novel Al(OH)3/CuMnAl-Layered Double Hydroxide for Detoxification of Organic Contaminants from Aqueous Solution.

Authors:  Jamiu O Eniola; Rajeev Kumar; Awad A Al-Rashdi; Mohammad Omaish Ansari; Mohamed A Barakat
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2019-10-22

4.  Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Interaction between Organic Phosphates and Goethite.

Authors:  Prasanth B Ganta; Oliver Kühn; Ashour A Ahmed
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.