| Literature DB >> 30037372 |
Chuang He1, Jing Yuan1, Yuxiao Chen1, Li Yang1, Liangshan Li1, Tingyuan Li1, Xuequan Huang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The preferred therapy for patients with pulmonary nodules which highly suspected as lung cancer by low-dose spiral computed tomography (CT) is surgery, but the best screening method of whole body is not clear yet. The aim of this study is to investigate the differences in the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with Ia stage non-small cell lung cancer after screening of positron emission computed tomography (PET)-CT and conventional imaging (B-ultrasound/CT/MRI/ECT, BCME).Entities:
Keywords: Lung neoplasms; PET-CT; Progression-free survival
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30037372 PMCID: PMC6058662 DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.07.04
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi ISSN: 1009-3419
患者临床资料
Clinical characteristics of patients after PSM
| Clinical factors | PET-CT | BCME | |
| AD: adenocarcinoma; N-Ad: non-adenocarcinoma; PSM: propensity score matching; PET: positron emission computed tomography; CT: computed tomography; BCME: B-ultrasound/CT/MRI/ECT; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; ECT: emission computed tomography. | |||
| Gender | 0.416 | ||
| Male | 72 | 66 | |
| Female | 42 | 48 | |
| Age (yr) | 0.686 | ||
| ≥60 | 45 | 48 | |
| < 60 | 69 | 66 | |
| Smoker | 0.427 | ||
| Yes | 61 | 55 | |
| No | 53 | 59 | |
| T stage | 0.861 | ||
| T1a | 8 | 10 | |
| T1b | 73 | 70 | |
| T1c | 33 | 34 | |
| Location (lung) | 0.110 | ||
| Left | 57 | 45 | |
| Right | 57 | 69 | |
| Pathology | 0.745 | ||
| AD | 91 | 89 | |
| N-Ad | 23 | 25 | |
| Chemotherapy | 0.232 | ||
| Yes | 65 | 56 | |
| No | 49 | 58 | |
1两组PFS情况。PET-CT组和BCME组比较,两组PFS无显著差异(χ2=1.284, P=0.257)。
PFS rates in patients with Ⅰa stage non-small cell lung cancer. PFS was no significant difference in PET-CT group compared with BCME group (χ2=1.284, P=0.257).
PFS的预测因素
Univariable and multivariable analyses of predictors of PFS after PSM
| Clinical factors | Univariable analysis of PFS | Multivariable analysis of PFS | |||||||||||
| B | SE | Wald | HR | 95%CI | B | SE | Wald | HR | 95%CI | ||||
| Gender (female | -0.045 | 0.363 | 0.015 | 0.902 | 1.046 | 0.514-2.128 | |||||||
| Age (< 60 | -0.295 | 0.364 | 0.655 | 0.418 | 0.745 | 0.365-1.521 | |||||||
| Smoke (Yes | -0.148 | 0.353 | 0.176 | 0.675 | 1.16 | 0.581-2.315 | |||||||
| Pathology (Ad | -0.969 | 0.536 | 3.268 | 0.071 | 0.379 | 0.133-1.085 | -1.133 | 0.541 | 4.391 | 0.036 | 0.322 | 0.112-0.929 | |
| T stage | 0.636 | 0.315 | 4.073 | 0.044 | 1.889 | 1.019-3.503 | 0.761 | 0.321 | 5.62 | 0.018 | 2.141 | 1.141-4.018 | |
| Location (left | -0.526 | 0.350 | 2.255 | 0.133 | 0.591 | 0.298-1.174 | |||||||
| Chemotherapy | -0.470 | 0.367 | 1.642 | 0.200 | 0.625 | 0.304-1.283 | |||||||
| PET-CT or BCME | -0.396 | 0.353 | 1.262 | 0.261 | 0.673 | 0.337-1.343 | |||||||