Literature DB >> 22890912

Diagnostic value of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Yihua Wu1, Peiwei Li, Honghe Zhang, Yu Shi, Han Wu, Jinjie Zhang, Yufeng Qian, Chao Li, Jun Yang.   

Abstract

In the recent years, fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has emerged as a new modality for staging non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in detecting metastatic lesions in NSCLC patients. Meta-analysis methods were used to pool sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likehood ratios, diagnostic odd ratios and to construct a summary receiver-operating characteristic curve. Data from included studies were pooled to compare the diagnostic accuracy between PET/CT and PET or CT alone in nodal staging. Totally, 56 studies involving 8,699 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivities and specificities of (18)F-FDG PET/CT were 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-0.78] and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.94) in determining mediastinal nodal staging; 0.71 (95% CI: 0.60-0.80) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.88) in intrathoracic staging; 0.78 (95% CI: 0.64-0.87) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94) in intrathoracic staging on a per-node basis. For detecting extrathoracic metastases, the pooled sensitivities and specificities of (18)F-FDG PET/CT were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.47-0.93) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.97) for all extrathoracic metastases; 0.91 (95% CI: 0.80-0.97) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99) for bone metastases. (18)F-FDG PET/CT is beneficial in detecting lymph node metastases and extrathoracic metastases although PET/CT showed low sensitivity in detecting brain metastases. (18)F-FDG PET/CT confers significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than contrast-enhanced CT (both p < 0.01) and higher sensitivity than (18)F-FDG PET in staging NSCLC (p < 0.05).
Copyright © 2012 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22890912     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  24 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guohua Shen; Houfu Deng; Shuang Hu; Zhiyun Jia
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Upfront surgery in patients with clinical skip N2 lung cancer based on results of modern radiological examinations.

Authors:  Tomohiro Maniwa; Yasushi Shintani; Jiro Okami; Yoshihisa Kadota; Yukiyasu Takeuchi; Koji Takami; Hideoki Yokouchi; Eiji Kurokawa; Ryu Kanzaki; Yasushi Sakamaki; Hiroyuki Shiono; Teruo Iwasaki; Kiyonori Nishioka; Ken Kodama; Meinoshin Okumura
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Identifying 18F-FDG PET-metabolic radiomic signature for lung adenocarcinoma prognosis via the leveraging of prognostic transcriptomic module.

Authors:  Jin Li; Yixin Liu; Wenlei Dong; Yang Zhou; Jingquan Wu; Kuan Luan; Lishuang Qi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-03

Review 4.  Toward Improved Outcomes for Patients With Lung Cancer Globally: The Essential Role of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Miriam N Mikhail Lette; Diana Paez; Lawrence N Shulman; Mathias Guckenberger; Jean-Yves Douillard; Wim J G Oyen; Francesco Giammarile; Venkatesh Rangarajan; Michelle Ginsberg; Olivier Pellet; Zhongxing Liao; May Abdel Wahab
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2022-05

5.  Dual time point imaging for F18-FDG-PET/CT does not improve the accuracy of nodal staging in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Julian M M Rogasch; Ingo G Steffen; Sandra Riedel; Ivayla Apostolova; Heinz Wertzel; H Jost Achenbach; Ferdinand L G A Steinkrüger; Thomas Kalinski; Meinald Schultz; Jens Schreiber; Holger Amthauer; Christian Furth
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Prognostic value of volumetric parameters of (18)F-FDG PET in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hyung-Jun Im; Kyoungjune Pak; Gi Jeong Cheon; Keon Wook Kang; Seong-Jang Kim; In-Joo Kim; June-Key Chung; E Edmund Kim; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Advances in multimodal treatment for stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Sara Montemuiño Muñiz; Soraya Marcos Sánchez; Julia Calzas Rodríguez; Beatriz Losada Vila; Esther Llorente Herrero; María Dolores Hisado Díaz; Victoria Valeri-Busto González; Begoña Taboada Valladares; Blanca Vaquero Barrón; Francisco José Marcos Jimenez; Sergio Amor Alonso; Javier Moradiellos; Núria Rodríguez de Dios; Felipe Couñago
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2021-04-16

8.  Imaging of lung cancer: Implications on staging and management.

Authors:  Nilendu C Purandare; Venkatesh Rangarajan
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

9.  The optimal timing of FDG-PET/CT in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosis and staging in an Australian centre.

Authors:  Anne Johnson; Richard Norman; Francesco Piccolo; David Manners
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.317

10.  In vivo evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease with the aid of μPET and the translocator protein 18 kDa radioligand [18F]DPA-714.

Authors:  Nicholas Bernards; Géraldine Pottier; Benoit Thézé; Frédéric Dollé; Raphael Boisgard
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.