Literature DB >> 30037296

Analysis of variability of fractional anisotropy values at 3T using a novel diffusion tensor imaging phantom.

James M Provenzale1, Brian A Taylor2,3, Elisabeth A Wilde4,5,6, Michael Boss7,8, Walter Schneider9.   

Abstract

We employed a novel diffusion tensor imaging phantom to study intra- and interscanner reproducibility on two 3T magnetic resonance (MR) scanners. Using a phantom containing thousands of hollow micron-size tubes in complex arrays, we performed two experiments using a b value of 1000 s/ms2 on two Siemens 3T Trio scanners. First, we performed 12-direction scans. Second, on one scanner, we performed two 64-direction protocols with different repetition times (TRs). We used a one-way analysis of variance to calculate differences between scanners and the Mann-Whitney U test to assess differences between 12-direction and 64-direction data. We calculated the coefficient of variation (CoV) for intrascanner and interscanner data. For 12-direction protocols, mean fractional anisotropy (FA) was 0.3003 for Scanner 1 (four scans) and 0.3094 for Scanner 2 (three scans). Lowest FA value on Scanner 1 was 2.56 standard deviations below the mean of Scanner 2. For 64-direction scans, mean FA was 0.2640 for 4000 ms TR and 0.2582 for 13,200 ms TR scans. For 12-direction scans, within-scanner CoV was 0.0326 for Scanner 1 and 0.0240 for Scanner 2; between-scanner CoV was 0.032. For 64-direction scans, CoV was 0.056 for TR 4000 ms and 0.0533 for TR 13,200 ms. The difference between median FA values of 12-direction and 64-direction scans was statistically significant ( p < 0.001). We found relatively good reproducibility on any single MR scanner. FA values from one scanner were sometimes significantly below the mean FA of another scanner, which has important implications for clinical use of DTI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain; diffusion; fractional anisotropy; imaging; phantom; quantitative

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30037296      PMCID: PMC6243462          DOI: 10.1177/1971400918789383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiol J        ISSN: 1971-4009


  14 in total

1.  Detection of blast-related traumatic brain injury in U.S. military personnel.

Authors:  Christine L Mac Donald; Ann M Johnson; Dana Cooper; Elliot C Nelson; Nicole J Werner; Joshua S Shimony; Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle; John R Witherow; Raymond Fang; Stephen F Flaherty; David L Brody
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Diffusion tensor fractional anisotropy of the normal-appearing seven segments of the corpus callosum in healthy adults and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Khader M Hasan; Rakesh K Gupta; Rafael M Santos; Jerry S Wolinsky; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Technical note: DTI measurements of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity at 1.5 T: comparison of two radiofrequency head coils with different functional designs and sensitivities.

Authors:  Marco Giannelli; Gina Belmonte; Nicola Toschi; Ilaria Pesaresi; Piero Ghedin; Antonio Claudio Traino; Carlo Bartolozzi; Mirco Cosottini
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Utility of diffusion tensor imaging in the acute stage of mild to moderate traumatic brain injury for detecting white matter lesions and predicting long-term cognitive function in adults.

Authors:  Makoto Matsushita; Kohkichi Hosoda; Yasuo Naitoh; Haruo Yamashita; Eiji Kohmura
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Harmonizing Diffusion MRI Data Across Multiple Sites and Scanners.

Authors:  Hengameh Mirzaalian; Amicie de Pierrefeu; Peter Savadjiev; Ofer Pasternak; Sylvain Bouix; Marek Kubicki; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Martha E Shenton; Yogesh Rathi
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2015-11-18

6.  White matter integrity and cognition in chronic traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study.

Authors:  Marilyn F Kraus; Teresa Susmaras; Benjamin P Caughlin; Corey J Walker; John A Sweeney; Deborah M Little
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Diffusion tensor imaging abnormalities in patients with mild traumatic brain injury and neurocognitive impairment.

Authors:  Calvin Lo; Keivan Shifteh; Tamar Gold; Jacqueline A Bello; Michael L Lipton
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 8.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Repeatability and variation of region-of-interest methods using quantitative diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain.

Authors:  Ullamari Hakulinen; Antti Brander; Pertti Ryymin; Juha Öhman; Seppo Soimakallio; Mika Helminen; Prasun Dastidar; Hannu Eskola
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Identical, but not the same: intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0T scanners.

Authors:  Christian Vollmar; Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh; Gareth J Barker; Mark R Symms; Pamela Thompson; Veena Kumari; John S Duncan; Mark P Richardson; Matthias J Koepp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  3 in total

1.  A validation framework for neuroimaging software: The case of population receptive fields.

Authors:  Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga; Noah Benson; Jonathan Winawer; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 2.  Harmonizing brain magnetic resonance imaging methods for vascular contributions to neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Eric E Smith; Geert Jan Biessels; François De Guio; Frank Erik de Leeuw; Simon Duchesne; Marco Düring; Richard Frayne; M Arfan Ikram; Eric Jouvent; Bradley J MacIntosh; Michael J Thrippleton; Meike W Vernooij; Hieab Adams; Walter H Backes; Lucia Ballerini; Sandra E Black; Christopher Chen; Rod Corriveau; Charles DeCarli; Steven M Greenberg; M Edip Gurol; Michael Ingrisch; Dominic Job; Bonnie Y K Lam; Lenore J Launer; Jennifer Linn; Cheryl R McCreary; Vincent C T Mok; Leonardo Pantoni; G Bruce Pike; Joel Ramirez; Yael D Reijmer; Jose Rafael Romero; Stefan Ropele; Natalia S Rost; Perminder S Sachdev; Christopher J M Scott; Sudha Seshadri; Mukul Sharma; Steven Sourbron; Rebecca M E Steketee; Richard H Swartz; Robert van Oostenbrugge; Matthias van Osch; Sanneke van Rooden; Anand Viswanathan; David Werring; Martin Dichgans; Joanna M Wardlaw
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2019-02-26

Review 3.  Predictive MRI Biomarkers in MS-A Critical Review.

Authors:  Vlad Eugen Tiu; Iulian Enache; Cristina Aura Panea; Cristina Tiu; Bogdan Ovidiu Popescu
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.