| Literature DB >> 30037116 |
Xiaomin Sun1,2,3, Zhen-Bo Cao4, Kumpei Tanisawa5,6, Satomi Oshima7, Mitsuru Higuchi8.
Abstract
Lower serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations are associated with more weight and fat mass gain in adults in the general population, but it is unknown whether this is the case in collegiate football athletes with greater body weight. This study aimed to investigate associations of serum 25(OH)D concentrations with body fat and ectopic fat accumulation, and to determine which fat indicators are closely related to serum 25(OH)D in male collegiate football athletes. Thirty-four collegiate athletes aged 21 years were recruited. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations and the levels of visceral fat area (VFA), vastus lateralis intramyocellular lipid (IMCL), extramyocellular lipid (EMCL), and intrahepatic lipid (IHCL) were measured. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were negatively associated with the IHCL values (r = -0.372, p = 0.030), and the relationship remained after adjustment for several factors (r = -0.378, p = 0.047). Additionally, multiple stepwise regression analysis of IHCL content as the dependent variable indicated that 25(OH)D concentrations were a stronger predictor of IHCL content (β = -0.363, p = 0.030) than % body fat and VO₂peakFFM. Higher serum 25(OH)D concentrations are more closely related to lower IHCL content rather than any other fat indicators, suggesting that increasing serum 25(OH)D concentrations may have some effect that inhibits lipid accumulation in hepatic tissue, especially in heavy athletes.Entities:
Keywords: American football; abdominal body fat; ectopic fat; rugby football; vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30037116 PMCID: PMC6073760 DOI: 10.3390/nu10070942
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Participant characteristics according to groups.
| Variable | Total ( | American Football ( | Rugby Football ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 21.0 (20.0–21.0) | 21.0 (20.0–22.0) | 21.0 (20.0–21.0) |
| Height (cm) | 175.0 ± 4.8 | 176.1 ± 4.5 | 174.4 ± 5.0 |
| Weight (kg) | 90.4 ± 10.9 | 95.5 ± 9.3 | 87.3 ± 10.8 * |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 29.5 ± 3.0 | 30.7 ± 2.0 | 28.7 ± 3.3 |
| WC (cm) | 90.3 ± 8.0 | 94.8 ± 6.4 | 87.5 ± 7.8 * |
| % Body fat | 16.6 ± 4.1 | 19.4 ± 2.6 | 14.8 ± 3.9 a,* |
| SFA (cm2) | 168.0 (89.5–222.0) | 207.0 (170.0–275.0) | 112.5 (72.3–183.0) a,* |
| VFA (cm2) | 82.8 ± 32.4 | 95.1 ± 31.6 | 74.8 ± 31.2 a |
| VO2peakFFM (mL/kg/min) | 48.7 ± 5.6 | 46.5 ± 5.4 | 50.1 ± 5.4 a |
| IHCL | 0.037 (0.017–0.082) | 0.047 (0.023–0.177) | 0.024 (0.008–0.064) |
| IMCL | 0.013 ± 0.006 | 0.014 ± 0.008 | 0.012 ± 0.005 |
| EMCL | 0.017 (0.012–0.030) | 0.019 (0.012–0.032) | 0.015 (0.012–0.028) |
| AST (IU/L) | 24.5 (21.8–36.0) | 25.0 (22.5–34.0) | 24.0 (21.0–36.5) |
| ALT (IU/L) | 34.1 ± 16.4 | 37.4 ± 20.8 | 32.1 ± 13.1 |
| γ-GTP (IU/L) | 28.0 (24.5–38.0) | 29.0 (24.0–35.0) | 27.0 (24.0–43.0) |
| 25(OH)D (nmol/L) | 61.3 (54.2–74.7) | 62.3 (53.9–79.0) | 60.3 (52.8–73.0) |
| Total energy intake (kcal) | 3895.8 (3534.5–4365.0) | 4071.7 (3662.8–5089.1) | 3840.7 (3476.1–4232.5) b |
| Carbohydrate intake (g) | 511.6 (461.9–621.0) | 522.6 (479.3–658.9) | 501.0 (450.2–571.1) b |
| Fat intake (g) | 130.9 ± 35.0 | 143.0 ± 32.0 | 123.1 ± 35.3 b |
| Protein intake (g) | 143.2 ± 33.8 | 155.0 ± 37.5 | 135.5 ± 29.6 b |
| Vitamin D intake (μg/day) | 10.4 ± 4.1 | 11.2 ± 4.9 | 9.7 ± 12.4 b |
| Calcium intake (mg/day) | 1185.4 ± 442.0 | 1284.8 ± 402.3 | 1120.8 ± 464.3 b |
Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (IQR) values. BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; SFA, subcutaneous fat area; VFA, visceral fat area; VO2peak, peak oxygen uptake; IHCL, intrahepatic lipid; IMCL, intramyocellular lipid; EMCL, extramyocellular lipid; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γ-GTP, γ-glutamyl transferase; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D. a n = 20; b n = 20, one person was excluded from the analysis because his total energy was >9000 kcal in rugby football; * p < 0.05 vs. American football players.
Figure 1Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency.
Correlations between 25(OH)D concentrations and other variables.
| Variables | 25(OH)D | 25(OH)D * | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | −0.231 | 0.189 | −0.012 | 0.952 |
| WC (cm) | −0.279 | 0.110 | −0.200 | 0.307 |
| % Body fat | −0.036 | 0.841 | 0.164 | 0.405 |
| SFA (cm2) | −0.138 | 0.444 | −0.026 | 0.895 |
| VFA (cm2) | −0.307 | 0.083 | −0.218 | 0.265 |
| IHCL | −0.372 | 0.030 | −0.378 | 0.047 |
| IMCL | 0.032 | 0.860 | −0.080 | 0.686 |
| EMCL | 0.019 | 0.913 | 0.125 | 0.526 |
| ALT (IU/L) | −0.098 | 0.583 | −0.048 | 0.806 |
| AST (IU/L) | 0.174 | 0.324 | 0.217 | 0.268 |
| γ-GTP (IU/L) | −0.297 | 0.088 | −0.317 | 0.100 |
Data are presented as Pearson’s coefficients. BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; SFA, subcutaneous fat area; VFA, visceral fat area; IHCL, intrahepatic lipid; IMCL, intramyocellular lipid; EMCL, extramyocellular lipid; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γ-GTP, γ-glutamyl transferase; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D. 25(OH)D, IHCL, EMCL, AST, and γ-GTP were log-transformed; SFA was square root transformed for analysis. Bold font indicates significance (p < 0.05). * Data are adjusted by group, position, and total energy intake.
Figure 2Associations among serum 25(OH)D with VFA (A), EMCL (B), IMCL (C), and IHCL (D). 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; VFA, visceral fat area; IMCL, intramyocellular lipid; EMCL, extramyocellular lipid; IHCL, intrahepatic lipid. Closed and open circles represent data from American footballers and rugby footballers, respectively.